Re: Debian + exim + procmail

2001-04-03 Thread Steven E. Harris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I've also been told that in standard configuration exim doesn't even > need the .forward, that just seeing a .procmailrc will provoke it > into invoking procmail. That's right. Here's a snippet from a typical Debian exim configuration file: ,[ /etc/exim.conf fragm

Re: Debian + exim + procmail

2001-04-03 Thread Rob Mahurin
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 11:09:14PM +0200, Gary Jones wrote: > Okay, exim has confused me again. I've just set up procmail, per that > app's documentation. Now exim says > > 2001-04-02 22:13:59 14kAi7-5E-01 ** |exec /usr/bin/procmail > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> D=userforward T=address_pipe: "exec"

Re: Debian + exim + procmail

2001-04-03 Thread garyjones
Am Mon, 02 April 2001 schrieb "Noah L. Meyerhans": > On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 11:09:14PM +0200, Gary Jones wrote: > > My .forward file is: > > > > "|exec /usr/bin/procmail" > > delete that, and all will be well Thanks, I will try that. I've also been told that in standard configu

Re: Debian + exim + procmail

2001-04-02 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 11:09:14PM +0200, Gary Jones wrote: > in the log. Iassume the D= & T= refer to Director and Transport > entries in exim.conf? My .forward file is: > > "|exec /usr/bin/procmail" delete that, and all will be well noah --