On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 11:59:23PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> It's a good example of why vacation programs should never be implemented
> by people who don't understand "Precedence: list", though. Precedence:
> is a hack, but it's about the best we've got
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 11:59:23PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 01:23:06AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I will respond to your message when I return. If you are in need of
> > immediate assistance please resend to Barbara Day at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
> > call 281-357-2
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 01:23:06AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I will respond to your message when I return. If you are in need of
> immediate assistance please resend to Barbara Day at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
> call 281-357-2867.
This is a good example of why vacation messages should never be
3 matches
Mail list logo