Re: Dangerously high Load_Cycle_Count on my Thinkpad T61 Hitachi drive

2013-06-04 Thread Celejar
On Mon, 3 Jun 2013 22:20:20 -0300 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sun, 02 Jun 2013, Celejar wrote: > > On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 21:54:09 -0300 > > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > > http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/Problem_with_hard_drive_clicking > > > > > > > 2) What should I do to attem

Re: Dangerously high Load_Cycle_Count on my Thinkpad T61 Hitachi drive

2013-06-03 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 02 Jun 2013, Celejar wrote: > On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 21:54:09 -0300 > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/Problem_with_hard_drive_clicking > > > > > 2) What should I do to attempt to preserve whatever life it has left? > > > hdparm -B 254/255? Anything else? >

Re: Dangerously high Load_Cycle_Count on my Thinkpad T61 Hitachi drive

2013-06-03 Thread Celejar
On Mon, 03 Jun 2013 08:58:57 -0700 Gary Roach wrote: > On 06/03/2013 06:23 AM, Pertti Kosunen wrote: > > On 3.6.2013 15:53, Celejar wrote: > >> Isn't that for WD drives? Mine's a Hitachi. > > > > Yes, sorry didn't read whole post. > > > > > Hi all, > The method used to fix the idle time on WD dri

Re: Dangerously high Load_Cycle_Count on my Thinkpad T61 Hitachi drive

2013-06-03 Thread Gary Roach
On 06/03/2013 06:23 AM, Pertti Kosunen wrote: On 3.6.2013 15:53, Celejar wrote: Isn't that for WD drives? Mine's a Hitachi. Yes, sorry didn't read whole post. Hi all, The method used to fix the idle time on WD drives won't work for the Hitachi. You may want to look at the following url, es

Re: Dangerously high Load_Cycle_Count on my Thinkpad T61 Hitachi drive

2013-06-03 Thread Pertti Kosunen
On 3.6.2013 15:53, Celejar wrote: Isn't that for WD drives? Mine's a Hitachi. Yes, sorry didn't read whole post. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51

Re: Dangerously high Load_Cycle_Count on my Thinkpad T61 Hitachi drive

2013-06-03 Thread Celejar
On Mon, 03 Jun 2013 11:07:08 +0300 Pertti Kosunen wrote: > On 2.6.2013 18:04, Celejar wrote: > > 2) What should I do to attempt to preserve whatever life it has left? > > hdparm -B 254/255? Anything else? > > http://idle3-tools.sourceforge.net/ (For linux) Isn't that for WD drives? Mine's a Hit

Re: Dangerously high Load_Cycle_Count on my Thinkpad T61 Hitachi drive

2013-06-03 Thread Pertti Kosunen
On 2.6.2013 18:04, Celejar wrote: 2) What should I do to attempt to preserve whatever life it has left? hdparm -B 254/255? Anything else? http://idle3-tools.sourceforge.net/ (For linux) http://support.wdc.com/product/download.asp?groupid=609&sid=113 (For DOS) You could increase idle timer to s

Re: Dangerously high Load_Cycle_Count on my Thinkpad T61 Hitachi drive

2013-06-02 Thread Celejar
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 17:36:47 +0200 Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2013-06-02 11:04:07 -0400, Celejar wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Prompted by another thread on this list, I decided to check my drive's > > Load_Cycle_Count, and it seems that my drive is living on borrowed time: > > > > 193 Load_Cycle_Coun

Re: Dangerously high Load_Cycle_Count on my Thinkpad T61 Hitachi drive

2013-06-02 Thread Celejar
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 21:54:09 -0300 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sun, 02 Jun 2013, Celejar wrote: > > Prompted by another thread on this list, I decided to check my drive's > > Load_Cycle_Count, and it seems that my drive is living on borrowed time: > > > > 193 Load_Cycle_Count0

Re: Dangerously high Load_Cycle_Count on my Thinkpad T61 Hitachi drive

2013-06-02 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 02 Jun 2013, Celejar wrote: > Prompted by another thread on this list, I decided to check my drive's > Load_Cycle_Count, and it seems that my drive is living on borrowed time: > > 193 Load_Cycle_Count0x0012 031 031 000Old_age Always > - 697557 > > Searchin

Re: Dangerously high Load_Cycle_Count on my Thinkpad T61 Hitachi drive

2013-06-02 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2013-06-02 11:04:07 -0400, Celejar wrote: > Hi, > > Prompted by another thread on this list, I decided to check my drive's > Load_Cycle_Count, and it seems that my drive is living on borrowed time: > > 193 Load_Cycle_Count0x0012 031 031 000Old_age Always > - 69