Re: Can start X once but no more

2010-09-09 Thread T o n g
On Mon, 06 Sep 2010 10:42:04 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote: > I run GNOME, so this technique may not work for you or may need to be > adapted. [ . . . ] I use startx, so it is much simpler for me. > [ . . . ] I can then deallocate vt 7 with > >deallocvt 7 > > I find that the "deallocvt 7"

Re: Can start X once but no more

2010-09-06 Thread Stephen Powell
On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 20:08:14 -0400 (EDT), Tong wrote: > On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 17:41:34 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote: >> I also use the nv driver, and I can start the X server multiple times, >> but usually not without manual intervention. What usually happens is >> that the old session only partiall

Re: Can start X once but no more

2010-09-05 Thread s. keeling
T o n g : > > Following up with > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.user/389399 DR. > I have exactly the same symptom: Damn, you're prolific. How anyone can come up with as many problems to post about as you do, I'll never understand. > $ uname -rm > 2.6.33-grml64 x86_64 Tha

Re: Can start X once but no more

2010-09-05 Thread T o n g
On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 17:41:34 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote: > I also use the nv driver, and I can start the X server multiple times, > but usually not without manual intervention. What usually happens is > that the old session only partially dies. The new session tries to grab > vt 7, but finds it

Re: Can start X once but no more

2010-09-05 Thread Stephen Powell
On Sat, 04 Sep 2010 22:53:04 -0400 (EDT), Tong wrote: > > Following up with > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.user/389399 > > I have exactly the same symptom: > > I can start X once. > After killing or quitting it once, it won't start again. > > I've posted my /var/log/Xorg.0.log