>> Is this intended behavior, or is this a bug in the installer? If it's
>> a bug, where is the right place to report it to? (I'm not sure which
>> package(s) are involved)
>
> It is partman-efi[1]. Don't know if there is any particular reason why
> they chose a pass value of 1 rather than 2, but
> https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-fstab-generator.html
>
> The passno field is treated like a simple boolean, and the ordering
> information
> is discarded. However, if the root file system is checked, it is checked
> before
> all the other file systems.
>
> So appar
On 2019-09-14, Nicholas A Fleisher wrote:
> In the /etc/fstab written by the installer, the sixth field of the
> /boot/efi line has the value "1". My understanding is that only
> the root
> partition should have this value (and it does in this case; the
> installer wrote two lines in /etc/fstab
On 2019-09-14 04:32 +, Nicholas A Fleisher wrote:
> In the /etc/fstab written by the installer, the sixth field of the
> /boot/efi line has the value "1". My understanding is that only the
> root partition should have this value (and it does in this case; the
> installer wrote two lines in /et
4 matches
Mail list logo
