It's rust, not a Golang, mate.
Yeah everything would be rust :)
On July 10, 2025 4:12:46 PM UTC, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 03:48:52PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
>> Hi,
>
>[...]
>
>> As an aside, sudo-rs is packaged as of Debian 13 (trixie, currently
>> testing) and I've been
As the name said, 'rs' stands for Rust, not Go, mate.
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 06:12:46PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 03:48:52PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> [...]
>
> > As an aside, sudo-rs is packaged as of Debian 13 (trixie, currently
> > testing) and I've
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 03:48:52PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi,
[...]
> As an aside, sudo-rs is packaged as of Debian 13 (trixie, currently
> testing) and I've been using it for a week now without complaints. sudo
> fans might like to give it a go.
Now, now. Is it Rust -- or Go?
[SCNR]
--
t
Hi,
I concur with others that it sounds like you simply don't have sudo
installed.
As an aside, sudo-rs is packaged as of Debian 13 (trixie, currently
testing) and I've been using it for a week now without complaints. sudo
fans might like to give it a go.
It replicates the functionality and conf
Lee Winter writes:
> [A1] is that netinstall left /etc/sudoers missing and /etc/sudoers.d/README
> empty -- there are no users at all. But that
> README file contains a strong recommendation for using visudo, which no
> longer exists.
visudo is included in the sudo package. I'd expect you have
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 07:13:48AM -0400, Lee Winter wrote:
> Got a dell 5400 workstation configured fully (8 cores, 32gb RAM, 160gb fast
> disk & 1.0tb slow disk) and I netinstalled debian Bookworm 12.10.0 on it.
> I also got the 20 DVDs with 92.5gb of Source packages. The machine seems
> OK, but
On Jul 10, 2025, Lee Winter wrote:
> Got a dell 5400 workstation configured fully (8 cores, 32gb RAM, 160gb
> fast disk & 1.0tb slow disk) and I netinstalled debian Bookworm
> 12.10.0 on it. I also got the 20 DVDs with 92.5gb of Source packages.
> The machine seems OK, but I am finding some [probl
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 07:13:48 -0400, Lee Winter wrote:
> [A1] is that netinstall left /etc/sudoers missing and /etc/sudoers.d/README
> empty -- there are no users at all. But that README file contains a strong
> recommendation for using visudo, which no longer exists.
>
> [A2] is that visudo is
On Monday, 23-09-2024 at 19:48 newbie...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> hello friends,
>
> I tried but found it too confusing to find where to report bugs for debian
> :-( .
What GUI are you using? (e.g. Gnome, KDE, Xfec, etc ?)
Wayland or X11 ?
What is the model number of monitor are you using?
On Thu 08 Sep 2022 at 10:02:15 +1000, David wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 03:14, Brian wrote:
> > On Wed 07 Sep 2022 at 15:48:35 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > > On Wed, 07 Sep 2022 12:39:23 + "jindam, vani"
> > > wrote:
>
> > Reports submitted from a specicic address may be viewed with
>
On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 03:14, Brian wrote:
> On Wed 07 Sep 2022 at 15:48:35 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > On Wed, 07 Sep 2022 12:39:23 + "jindam, vani"
> > wrote:
> Reports submitted from a specicic address may be viewed with
>
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi/submitter=
On Wed, 7 Sep 2022 18:14:22 +0100
Brian wrote:
Hello Brian,
>Reports submitted from a specicic address may be viewed with
Good to know. Bookmarked for future reference. Thank you.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is never immediately apparent"
/ _)rad "Is i
On Wed 07 Sep 2022 at 15:48:35 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Sep 2022 12:39:23 +
> "jindam, vani" wrote:
>
> Hello vani,
>
> >luckily there were few bugs created
> >by me..
>
> Yeah, it will probably be a real PITA to find all those bugs already
> submitted by you.
Reports submi
On Wed, 07 Sep 2022 12:39:23 +
"jindam, vani" wrote:
Hello vani,
>luckily there were few bugs created
>by me..
Yeah, it will probably be a real PITA to find all those bugs already
submitted by you.
At least from now on, you've got some sort of mechanism to monitor any
bug action.
It migh
On 7 September 2022 7:51:29 AM UTC, Brad Rogers wrote:
>On Wed, 07 Sep 2022 07:09:46 +
>"jindam, vani" wrote:
>
>Hello vani,
>
>>is it possible to view changes made
>>on bugs submitted by me using rss.
>
>AFAIAA, no. However, you *can* 'subscribe' to the bug on bugs.debian
>in much the s
On 2022-09-07 at 03:37, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 07:09:46AM +, jindam, vani wrote:
>
>> hello debian users,
>>
>> is it possible to view changes made
>> on bugs submitted by me using rss. perhaps,
>> a moreinfo needed tag of a bug submitted
>> by me didnt received
On Wed, 07 Sep 2022 07:09:46 +
"jindam, vani" wrote:
Hello vani,
>is it possible to view changes made
>on bugs submitted by me using rss.
AFAIAA, no. However, you *can* 'subscribe' to the bug on bugs.debian
in much the same way you can subscribe to a mailing list (near the top
there's lin
On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 07:09:46AM +, jindam, vani wrote:
> hello debian users,
>
> is it possible to view changes made
> on bugs submitted by me using rss. perhaps,
> a moreinfo needed tag of a bug submitted
> by me didnt received through email.
>
> i am talking about bugs submitted on
>
On 30/01/17 12:59 AM, Andreas Ronnquist wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:37:42 -0500,
Frank M wrote:
Tried to file a bug today using reportbug but it crashed:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/reportbug", line 2233, in
main()
File "/usr/bin/reportbug", line 1084, in
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:37:42 -0500,
Frank M wrote:
>Tried to file a bug today using reportbug but it crashed:
>
>
>Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/reportbug", line 2233, in
> main()
> File "/usr/bin/reportbug", line 1084, in main
> if newui.initialize():
> File "
Quoting Richard Jasmin (frazzledj...@gmail.com):
> I have a bug in liberoffice writer that puts text on a new line instead
> of using the spacebar to do so.
> I cant report the bug as the packages is not listed for liberoffice.
...because there's no such package. OTOH there is one called libreoffi
On 2015-04-18 00:00, Richard Jasmin wrote:
I have a bug in liberoffice writer that puts text on a new line instead
of using the spacebar to do so.
I don't understand what you mean. Do you want the spacebar to work like
the return key?
-- August
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 04:37:54AM -0800, Chris Help wrote:
> Im affraid as i plug in router they go everywhere. They also at my brother,
> on my.harddrive from laptop. Im cannot dl whats app or call because of
> them. And really it was just i wanne to learn and no more Windows os. I had
> kali and
The make loopbacks or somthing. I plugged router in now. Mij laptop i do
not because i thing they also go to all my contacts
. I uninstalled everything
Op 23 nov. 2014 13:37 schreef "Chris Help" <
helpmescripsareeverywh...@gmail.com> het volgende:
> Im affraid as i plug in router they go everywher
On 08/20/2011 02:30 PM, Walter Hurry wrote:
I haven't done Wheezy, but I've done Squeeze from a "netinst" download. I
used unetbootin to put it onto a USB and it worked flawlessly.
Yes, I've used unetbootin before. I had heard that unetbootin isn't
working right now. No idea how true that is
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 12:03:18 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> On 08/19/2011 02:46 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 05:28:44 -0400, Scott Reagan wrote:
>>
>>> I tried to install the small verion of debian, the 32 bit version and
>>> it wouldn't read my dvd rom so I couldn't finish the ins
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 12:32:07 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> Thank you very much for that link. I'll study that, though I got the
> other prep method from the site of a guy who was involved in setting up
> the use of the hybrid images for these images. You've given me some
> homework to do. I can
On 08/20/2011 12:19 PM, Camaleón wrote:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 12:03:18 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
...
This has me wondering if there was something wrong with the hybrid
images so that they wouldn't work with the standard method of
preparation, namely
# dd if=.iso of=/dev/sdX
wouldn't work.
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 12:03:18 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> On 08/19/2011 02:46 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 05:28:44 -0400, Scott Reagan wrote:
>>
>>> I tried to install the small verion of debian, the 32 bit version and
>>> it wouldn't read my dvd rom so I couldn't finish the ins
On 08/19/2011 02:46 PM, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 05:28:44 -0400, Scott Reagan wrote:
I tried to install the small verion of debian, the 32 bit version and it
wouldn't read my dvd rom so I couldn't finish the install. please help.
I really want this os system and have heard great thin
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 05:28:44 -0400, Scott Reagan wrote:
> I tried to install the small verion of debian, the 32 bit version and it
> wouldn't read my dvd rom so I couldn't finish the install. please help.
> I really want this os system and have heard great things about it.
You can try to install
2011. augusztus 17. 13:28:44 dátummal Scott Reagan az alábbiakat írta:
> I tried to install the small verion of debian, the 32 bit version and it
> wouldn't read my dvd rom so I couldn't finish the install. please help. I
> really want this os system and have heard great things about it.
The Debia
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 16:01:42 +0100, Lesley Binks wrote:
> Hi
>
> I just did an 'apt-get upgrade -s' and found these updates were required
>
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> The following packages will be upgraded:
> cpio libperl5.8 linux-image-2.6.18-6-4
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 04:01:42PM +0100, Lesley Binks wrote:
> I just did an 'apt-get upgrade -s' and found these updates were required
> Preparing to replace cpio 2.6-18 (using .../cpio_2.6-18.1+etch1_i386.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement cpio ...
> Setting up cpio (2.6-18.1+etch1) ...
> Errn
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 12:32:13PM +0800, Huang, Kuan-Chung wrote:
> PROBLEM 2:
> I press the "software update" button at the right-up coner on the screen, the
> system prompts to enter administrative password.
> BUT, during installating the system, it never prompts any messages for
> setting u
On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 18:33, James Wiggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 11:22, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 08:59, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> > > > >The bugs are *not* repeatable. I can type make, have the make
> > > > > choke on something like the above, type m
I tried compiling the program, and had no problems. No compiler errors
crapping out or anything.
Running on Debian Sarge.
--
John L. Fjellstad
web: http://www.fjellstad.org/ Quis custodiet ipsos custodes
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On Sat, 2004-10-23 at 00:27, Patrick Albuquerque wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 07:45:17AM -0400, James Wiggs wrote:
> >I'm trying to determine if I've found bugs in the C++ compiler
> > on Sarge or not. I'm trying to compile quickfix-1.9.2 and some of
>
> I tried compile, just for kicks.
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 07:45:17AM -0400, James Wiggs wrote:
>I'm trying to determine if I've found bugs in the C++ compiler
> on Sarge or not. I'm trying to compile quickfix-1.9.2 and some of
I tried compile, just for kicks.
No problems. One question - what does the software do?
Sarge,
On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 11:22, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 08:59, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> > > >The bugs are *not* repeatable. I can type make, have the make
> > > > choke on something like the above, type make again, and it will get
> > > > through the compile.
On Oct 22 2004, James Wiggs wrote:
>I have access to another box running RedHat 8.0; I will attempt
> a compile over there.
You might want to create a chroot install of sarge there (or in any other
computer you can) to test if it is really g++ doing bad things.
Hope this helps, Rogério.
--
> On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 08:59, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> > >The bugs are *not* repeatable. I can type make, have the make
> > > choke on something like the above, type make again, and it will get
> > > through the compile.
> >
> > Are you sure you don't have hardware problems?
> > Most l
On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 11:22, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 08:59, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> > > >The bugs are *not* repeatable. I can type make, have the make
> > > > choke on something like the above, type make again, and it will get
> > > > through the compile.
On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 08:59, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> >The bugs are *not* repeatable. I can type make, have the make
> > choke on something like the above, type make again, and it will get
> > through the compile.
>
> Are you sure you don't have hardware problems?
> Most likely such gcc
>The bugs are *not* repeatable. I can type make, have the make
> choke on something like the above, type make again, and it will get
> through the compile.
Are you sure you don't have hardware problems?
Most likely such gcc failures are caused by bad ram and/or processor
overheat.
--
To UN
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 06:59:10PM -0400, xavier wrote:
> On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 11:44:32PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > This is being worked on (by me) in the bug tracking system. It's not an
> > easy task, and not well-solved by tags.
>
> Thanks a lot, I guess you think that's an issue too.
>
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 11:44:32PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> This is being worked on (by me) in the bug tracking system. It's not an
> easy task, and not well-solved by tags.
>
Thanks a lot, I guess you think that's an issue too.
Although I perfectly understand it is a hard problem to sol
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 06:34:18PM -0400, xavier wrote:
> However, when there is a problem on a package in stable which
> is not important enough to be updated, the package stays
> as-is and information about this bug is difficult to retrieve.
>
> That the package doesn't change is fine with me,
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 01:46:20PM +0100, Nicolas Bertolissio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please cc to me, I've not subscribed.
Your Mail-Followup-To: contradicts this. I suggest you use 'lists'
rather than 'subscribe' for debian-user in .muttrc.
> According to the descriptions sent by the ddts, it seems a
Dear sean, nate, Colin, Jamin,
thanks for your replies. Even not appreciated in a mailing list of
puritans, I reply to all emails by sending one only -- I assume the
Debian mailing list is not a list of mailing list-puritans since many
full-quoting-top-posters are seen ,-).
* sean finney <[EMAIL
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 11:57:22PM +0100, Lukas Ruf wrote:
> So, my question is quite easy: wouldn't it be more secure if mozilla
> was installed by dselect/apt-get/dpkg with set-uid to nobody.nogroup?
(snip)
> What do you think?
Since you asked, I think it would be a waste of time. Provided you
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 11:57:22PM +0100, Lukas Ruf wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> on the one hand one reads about bugs in the Mircosoft Internet
> Exploder based on Active Scripting and other holes quite often. On
> the other hand, rarely bugs in the Mozilla and Co. are reported.
> However, I believe th
Lukas Ruf said:
> What do you think?
wouldn't this introduce problems when it came to authenticating with
the X server? I mean, another user running mozilla probably cannot
just do it. You need to grant that user access to connect to your
display.
and if multiple users are using mozilla, that in
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 11:57:22PM +0100, Lukas Ruf wrote:
> So, my question is quite easy: wouldn't it be more secure if mozilla
> was installed by dselect/apt-get/dpkg with set-uid to nobody.nogroup?
> /* Of course, this would make impossible to download files into one's
>home directory excep
On Wed, 30 Sep 1998, Alexander Gutfraind wrote:
> How are bugs cathegorized, numbered and bug reports
> submitted?
See http://www.debian.org/Bugs
> Most bug fixes are around "bug #26600", does it mean that
> 26600 is the total number
> of bugs discovered in all packages?
Yes, but many of them
On Wed, Apr 29, 1998 at 08:48:23AM -0400, Carroll Kong wrote:
> I think you can compile back in name completion. I got a bug where it
> would resume files improperly and append MORE data than the original file was
> supposed to have. (ncftp 3.0 beta 9)
Yes, it did have that problem..
p
On Tue, Apr 28, 1998 at 08:03:58AM -0400, David Morris wrote:
> I certainly am hoping the 3.0 version moves out of beta pretty soon. I
> did really like the bgget feature as well. And it only took a little
> looking at the help to find the pls command to page through long
> directory listings.
>
On "Tue, 28 Apr 1998 02:25:40 EDT." Norbert Veber wove together:
[snipped]
problem is that ncftp has been downgraded from 3.0b to 2.something, so
it
doesn't recognise those options, personally, I snagged the 3.0 deb from
one
of the mirrors before it was gone, and I use that (mainly because of th
I think you can compile back in name completion. I got a bug where it
would resume files improperly and append MORE data than the original file was
supposed to have. (ncftp 3.0 beta 9)
Carroll Kong
On Tue, 28 Apr 1998, Ted Cabeen wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Apr 27, 1998 at 06:56:34PM -0600, Britton Leo Kerin wrote:
>
> When I do
>
>ncftp ftp.debian.org 2> error.log
>
> error.log looks like:
>
> Error: Unrecognized preference option "#".
> Error: Unrecognized preference option "#".
> Error: Unrecognized preference option "#".
> Error:
On Tue, Apr 28, 1998 at 12:30:33AM -0500, Ted Cabeen wrote:
> >I think this is because you had NcFTP 3.0 (which was in non-free),
> >and have now upgraded to NcFTP 2.4.3 (now GPL).
>
> Yup, that's it. And its a good thing too, because 3.0 sucks. (No completion,
> no paging of long directory entr
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hamish Moffatt writes:
>On Mon, Apr 27, 1998 at 06:56:34PM -0600, Britton Leo Kerin wrote:
>> error.log looks like:
>>
>I think this is because you had NcFTP 3.0 (which was in non-free),
>and have now upgraded to NcFTP 2.4.3 (now GPL).
Yup, that's it. And its a go
On Mon, Apr 27, 1998 at 06:56:34PM -0600, Britton Leo Kerin wrote:
> error.log looks like:
>
> Error: Unrecognized preference option "#".
> Error: Unrecognized preference option "#".
> Error: Unrecognized preference option "#".
> Error: Unrecognized preference option "[EMAIL PROTECTED](none)".
> E
> On Sun, 27 Jul 1997, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
>
> >
> > the Debian bug tracking system at http://www.debian.org/bugs.
>
> Sorry that should be Bugs not bugs. So http://www.debian.org/Bugs is the
> correct URL.
Thanks. Five bugs reported so far today.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LI
On Sun, 27 Jul 1997, Carl Fink wrote:
:I send a letter to this list earlier, complaining about a problem after
:upgrading inn. I have now figured out the problem.
:
:Consulting the inn FAQ, I find that the error I saw is caused by a
:corrupt history.dir file. Theoretically running makehistory as
> :Another bug for the maintainer: the new ppp package prevented me from
> :running the pon script as non-root. It happens that I knew how to fix
> :this (chmod the pppd executable to make it runnably by mere mortals),
> :but a beginner would be stumped.
>
> A better idea, read the docs and make
On Sun, 27 Jul 1997, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
>
> the Debian bug tracking system at http://www.debian.org/bugs.
Sorry that should be Bugs not bugs. So http://www.debian.org/Bugs is the
correct URL.
-- Jaldhar
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL P
On Sun, 27 Jul 1997, Carl Fink wrote:
> I send a letter to this list earlier, complaining about a problem after
> upgrading inn. I have now figured out the problem.
>
> Consulting the inn FAQ, I find that the error I saw is caused by a
> corrupt history.dir file. Theoretically running makehisto
On Mon, 26 Aug 1996, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Kevin M. Bealer writes ("Bugs"):
> > I've submitted these two bugs to debian bugs, and got no
> > response; I submitted them again, and still got no response.
> > (Has the list address changed recently?) I could try again, but
> > then I would have to w
Kevin M. Bealer writes ("Bugs"):
> I've submitted these two bugs to debian bugs, and got no
> response; I submitted them again, and still got no response.
> (Has the list address changed recently?) I could try again, but
> then I would have to wait again, and so on, so... (In
> otherwords, sorr
The submission address did change, to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Bruce
71 matches
Mail list logo
