On 15/06/10 14:31, Tom Furie wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 01:02:47PM +0100, Alan Chandler wrote:
On 15/06/10 12:44, Alan Chandler wrote:
The real magic command is "cp -alf" which essentially merges a shorter
term store with a longer term one, making new entries where the shorter
store has a
On 06/16/2010 05:45 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Ron Johnson put forth on 6/15/2010 10:59 AM:
I wrote a script that only backs up our data directories (including much
of /home) into a bunch of tarballs, excluding "junk" folders like
caches, thumbnails, trash, etc, and compressing most but not stuff
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 14:14:22 Camaleón wrote:
> Many people send the replies to me directly and I am not sure
> whether if they are full aware of that (intentionally off-list) or this
> is just the famous Gmail's webmail "non-reply-to-list-but-sender"
> error :-)
I forgot that Gmail does that
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 14:14:22 Camaleón wrote:
> but I asked you why you were so reluctant to use
> differential backups on her computer. I couldn't understand "why" because
> today backup tasks are just "point-and-click", I mean, they are easier to
> achieve than any image generation of the wh
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:05:56 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 June 2010 08:41:03 Camaleón wrote:
>> El 2010-06-15 a las 22:58 +0100, Lisi escribió:
>>
>> (resending to the list)
>
> Sorry. I debated whether to send it to you or the list, and decided
> that it was OT for the list since I was
Ron Johnson put forth on 6/15/2010 10:59 AM:
> I wrote a script that only backs up our data directories (including much
> of /home) into a bunch of tarballs, excluding "junk" folders like
> caches, thumbnails, trash, etc, and compressing most but not stuff like
> image and OOo document directories
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 08:41:03 Camaleón wrote:
> El 2010-06-15 a las 22:58 +0100, Lisi escribió:
>
> (resending to the list)
Sorry. I debated whether to send it to you or the list, and decided that it
was OT for the list since I was commenting on a specific sentence of your
that wasn't stri
El 2010-06-15 a las 22:58 +0100, Lisi escribió:
(resending to the list)
> On Tuesday 15 June 2010 19:44:33 Camaleón wrote:
> > But it's "her" backup and "her" data. She should care about how to do
> > things like these, whatever place she is (home, university, work...).
>
> I was forgetting that
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 06:49:25PM +0100, Lisi wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 June 2010 18:06:51 Camaleón wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:48:04 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 15 June 2010 14:40:44 Camaleón wrote:
> > >> I would differentiate between "backup" data and "archived" data.
> >
> > (...)
>
On 06/15/2010 05:02 PM, Lisi wrote:
Sorry for duplicate everybody. The list has been rejecting my emails with my
usual SMTP set up. This means that I may think that something has gone when
it hasn't or vice versa.
Something like that happened to me a year or so ago when my ISP got
much stri
Sorry for duplicate everybody. The list has been rejecting my emails with my
usual SMTP set up. This means that I may think that something has gone when
it hasn't or vice versa.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 19:09:28 Ron Johnson wrote:
> *Teach* her. She's in Uni, correct? Thus, she should be
> responsible enough to take care of her own data by sticking in a USB
> drive and running a script.
Two people divided by a common language
No, she's at school, where school in thi
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 19:09:28 Ron Johnson wrote:
> *Teach* her. She's in Uni, correct? Thus, she should be
> responsible enough to take care of her own data by sticking in a USB
> drive and running a script.
Two people divided by a common language
No, she's at school, where school in thi
On 06/15/2010 01:18 PM, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
[snip]
I think the OP said something like: I have 1.3 TB and it's too big to
backup. This of course is patently ridiculous. meh.
Right. You're a fool to buy a Lexus if you can't afford the (way
more than bare legal minimum) auto insurance
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:49:25 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 June 2010 18:06:51 Camaleón wrote:
>> Why not practical? Just curious O:-)
>
> Because I shan't have hold of the computer for long enough or often
> enough!
But it's "her" backup and "her" data. She should care about how to do
thi
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 09:27:47PM +1000, Alexander Samad wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Lisi wrote:
> > Please excuse the thread breaking. I have suddenly been being rejected by
> > the
> > list server and am sending for the third time. I hope that the list server
> > is now happy w
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:59:46AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 06/15/2010 09:48 AM, Lisi wrote:
> >
> >Thanks for this. I was originally responding to Andrew's saying:
> >
> >There are many many ways to make take backups beyond having a disk big
> >enough to hold the data.
> >
> >
> >I can thin
On 06/15/2010 12:49 PM, Lisi wrote:
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 18:06:51 Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:48:04 +0100, Lisi wrote:
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 14:40:44 Camaleón wrote:
I would differentiate between "backup" data and "archived" data.
(...)
Thanks for this. I was originally re
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 18:06:51 Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:48:04 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> > On Tuesday 15 June 2010 14:40:44 Camaleón wrote:
> >> I would differentiate between "backup" data and "archived" data.
>
> (...)
>
> > Thanks for this. I was originally responding to Andrew's say
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 06/15/2010 05:32 AM, Lisi wrote:
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 01:25:56 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
There are many many ways to make take backups beyond having a disk big
enough to hold the data.
Would you feel inclined to elaborate? I'm trying to solve this
problem for my
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:48:04 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 June 2010 14:40:44 Camaleón wrote:
>> I would differentiate between "backup" data and "archived" data.
(...)
> Thanks for this. I was originally responding to Andrew's saying:
>
> There are many many ways to make take backups bey
On 06/15/2010 09:48 AM, Lisi wrote:
Thanks for this. I was originally responding to Andrew's saying:
There are many many ways to make take backups beyond having a disk big
enough to hold the data.
I can think of very few - and was interested in what he was thinking of.
Incremental/differenti
On 06/15/2010 05:32 AM, Lisi wrote:
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 01:25:56 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
There are many many ways to make take backups beyond having a disk big
enough to hold the data.
Would you feel inclined to elaborate? I'm trying to solve this problem for my
granddaughter's large
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 14:40:44 Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:32:15 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> > On Tuesday 15 June 2010 01:25:56 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >> There are many many ways to make take backups beyond having a disk big
> >> enough to hold the data.
> >
> > Would you feel incli
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:32:15 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 June 2010 01:25:56 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>> There are many many ways to make take backups beyond having a disk big
>> enough to hold the data.
>
> Would you feel inclined to elaborate? I'm trying to solve this problem
> for m
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 01:02:47PM +0100, Alan Chandler wrote:
> On 15/06/10 12:44, Alan Chandler wrote:
>
>> The real magic command is "cp -alf" which essentially merges a shorter
>> term store with a longer term one, making new entries where the shorter
>> store has a file that isn't in the longe
On 15/06/10 12:44, Alan Chandler wrote:
The real magic command is "cp -alf" which essentially merges a shorter
term store with a longer term one, making new entries where the shorter
store has a file that isn't in the longer term store, and overwriting it
where the shorter term store has a file
On 15/06/10 11:36, Lisi wrote:
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 01:25:56 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
There are many many ways to make take backups beyond having a disk big
enough to hold the data.
Would you feel inclined to elaborate? I'm trying to solve this problem for my
granddaughter's large HDD,
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Lisi wrote:
> Please excuse the thread breaking. I have suddenly been being rejected by the
> list server and am sending for the third time. I hope that the list server
> is now happy with my SMTP settings.
>
> On Tuesday 15 June 2010 01:25:56 Andrew Sackville-We
29 matches
Mail list logo
