Don writes:
> I am running Debian 3.0 r2 on a 200Hz K6 on 4GB harddrive.
^
> A little slow
I should think so.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Storey wrote:
> I believe that K6 is compatible with 486 and even 586.
>hasler/~ uname -a
>Linux hasler.dhh.gt.org 2.2.12 #1 Mon Oct 4 22:06:49 CDT 1999 i586 unknown
>hasler/~ cat /proc/cpuinfo
>processor : 0
>vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
>cpu family : 5
>model : 6
>m
Robert Storey wrote:
> I believe that K6 is compatible with 486 and even 586.
hasler/~ uname -a
Linux hasler.dhh.gt.org 2.2.12 #1 Mon Oct 4 22:06:49 CDT 1999 i586 unknown
hasler/~ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 5
model : 6
model nam
Robert Storey wrote:
I believe that K6 is compatible with 486 and even 586. However, I
don't have
one here to test it, so you'll have to try it yourself.
I would second this, K6 implements pentium instructions (586) and I'll
raise you a pentium pro :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
I believe that K6 is compatible with 486 and even 586. However, I don't have
one here to test it, so you'll have to try it yourself.
regards,
Robert
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 06:34, Marc Auslander wrote:
> I'm running a now out of date stable system - the sarge prerelease.
>
> When I upgraded to
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 06:02:44PM -0600, Cam wrote:
> Just compile your own. 386, K6, etc. are all still avaliable in the
> standard kernel, even if they're not in the packages (if you're scared
> of configuring your own, you could probably just copy the config file
> from a (more recent) older k
Marc Auslander wrote:
I'm running a now out of date stable system - the sarge prerelease.
When I upgraded to the 2.6 kernel, k6 was no longer available. I
found that 386 worked.
I am using kernels 2.6.8 and 2.6.11 compiled for my K6. The only issue
I had was the system clock slowing down due
7 matches
Mail list logo
