Re: Adobe flash is dead [OT]

2011-11-10 Thread Lorenzo Sutton
On 10/11/2011 09:22, Scott Ferguson wrote: On 10/11/11 19:07, Lorenzo Sutton wrote: On 09/11/2011 19:18, T o n g wrote: Well, not exactly now but at lease Adobe flash is dead for all mobile devices: Adobe confirms Flash Player is dead for mobile devices http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/09/adobe

Re: Adobe flash is dead [OT]

2011-11-10 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 10/11/11 19:07, Lorenzo Sutton wrote: > On 09/11/2011 19:18, T o n g wrote: >> Well, not exactly now but at lease Adobe flash is dead for all mobile >> devices: >> >> Adobe confirms Flash Player is dead for mobile devices >> http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/09/adobe-confirms-flash-player-is-dead-

Re: Adobe flash is dead [OT]

2011-11-09 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 10/11/11 11:10, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 19:51 +, Andrew Wood wrote: >> Why do Linux distros consider it desirable to install Gnash by >> default? Because most GNU/Linux distributions try and provide a secure user experience. FFflash is the antidote for security. Gnash