Re: APT had planned for dpkg to do more than it reported back

2022-04-15 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 11:41:18PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > i wrote: > > > Today i did an ugrade from 10.10 to 10.3 > > Charles Curley wrote: > > Did you mean from 10.10 to 11.3? > > Yes. 11.3, of course. I still have to get used to the new number. > > > You might try > > removing

Re: APT had planned for dpkg to do more than it reported back

2022-04-15 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, i wrote: > > Today i did an ugrade from 10.10 to 10.3 Charles Curley wrote: > Did you mean from 10.10 to 11.3? Yes. 11.3, of course. I still have to get used to the new number. > You might try > removing it (and whatever might depend on it) before you do the upgrade. Well, the upgrade is c

Re: APT had planned for dpkg to do more than it reported back

2022-04-15 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 02:25:21PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote: > On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:35:41 +0200 > "Thomas Schmitt" wrote: > > > Today i did an ugrade from 10.10 to 10.3…. > > Did you mean from 10.10 to 11.3? 11.3 being the current version of > Bullseye. > > On that assumption, texlive seem

Re: APT had planned for dpkg to do more than it reported back

2022-04-15 Thread Charles Curley
On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:35:41 +0200 "Thomas Schmitt" wrote: > Today i did an ugrade from 10.10 to 10.3…. Did you mean from 10.10 to 11.3? 11.3 being the current version of Bullseye. On that assumption, texlive seems to be optional on 11.3. You might try removing it (and whatever might depend on

Re: APT had planned for dpkg to do more than it reported back

2022-04-15 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, this thread is 2 years old: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2020/04/msg01337.html Google found it for me. Today i did an ugrade from 10.10 to 10.3 following the instructions in https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en Strangely i got this warning too:

Re: APT had planned for dpkg to do more than it reported back

2020-04-29 Thread songbird
Sven Joachim wrote: ... > It's up to you. If the message comes up again, I would report it, but > probably not at the first incident. i also saw it this morning, but since this is testing and texlive seems to get frequent changes i decided to ignore it since i am not a heavy user of that packag

Re: APT had planned for dpkg to do more than it reported back

2020-04-29 Thread Andrea Borgia
Il 29/04/20 17:36, Sven Joachim ha scritto: Unless there are good reasons to report it, I'd say I can let it drop, right? It's up to you. If the message comes up again, I would report it, but probably not at the first incident. I think it's the first time I ever saw it in years, I'll report

Re: APT had planned for dpkg to do more than it reported back

2020-04-29 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2020-04-29 13:25 +0200, Andrea Borgia wrote: > Hi. > > testing/unstable system here, just did an upgrade and I got the > following message: > > W: APT had planned for dpkg to do more than it reported back (372 vs 389). >Affected packages: texlive-latex-base:amd64 >texlive-latex-extra:am