On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, Peter Bartosch wrote:
> > On 19-Jan-99, Peter Bartosch took time to write :
> > >> bogomips should only depend on hardware no ?
> > >
> > > only on cpu (and clock)
> >
> > that's what i thought too, but it doesn't seem true in my case
> > as with exactly the same hardware an
Hi!
> On 19-Jan-99, Peter Bartosch took time to write :
> >> bogomips should only depend on hardware no ?
> >
> > only on cpu (and clock)
>
> that's what i thought too, but it doesn't seem true in my case
> as with exactly the same hardware and no change in bios
> i have
> 700 bogomips with ker
On 19-Jan-99, Peter Bartosch took time to write :
>> bogomips should only depend on hardware no ?
>
> only on cpu (and clock)
that's what i thought too, but it doesn't seem true in my case
as with exactly the same hardware and no change in bios
i have
700 bogomips with kernel 2.2.0pre7
and 350bog
Hi!
> i have :
> processor : 0
> cpu : 586
> model : AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor
> vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
> stepping: M < difference !!! what is it ?
it's a production-revision!
higher stepping - newer cpu because of newer production-masks (and hop
On Sun, Jan 17, 1999 at 11:13:41AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think i have a problem with one of my new K6-2 box.
> I have two boxes : same motherboard (ASUS P5A) , same amount of memory
> (128Mo).
> Same output of /proc/cpuinfo for both
>
> *except* for bogomips.
>
> One is a 350MHz and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think i have a problem with one of my new K6-2 box.
>
> I have two boxes : same motherboard (ASUS P5A) , same amount of memory
> (128Mo).
> Same output of /proc/cpuinfo for both
>
> *except* for bogomips.
>
> One is a 350MHz and it gives me ~350 Bogomips
On Sun, 17 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> otherwise the 'compile as [386/486/Pentium/PentiumPro]' option in kernel
> compilation could change the bogomips rating or not ?
> i compiled it as a 686.
> should i compile it as a 586 ?
>From Configure.help:
- "Pentium" for the AMD K5, K6 and K
On 17-Jan-99, Phillip Deackes took time to write :
>> so my AMD K6-2 at 350Mhz should have 700Bogomips isn't it ?
>
> I think I would be concerned too. I have an AMD K6-2 3D 350 MHz
I am !
> processor, overclocked to 400MHz and I get the following from cat
> /proc/cpuinfo:
>
> processor :
On 17-Jan-99, Marcus Brinkmann took time to write :
> On Sun, Jan 17, 1999 at 03:34:42PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> besides the fact it seems outdated (1997-12-13), it says like me:
>> AMD K5/K6 clock * (2.00 plusminus 0.010) 11.1
>>
>> and it lists K6 at 166Mhz havi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> besides the fact it seems outdated (1997-12-13), it says like me:
> AMD K5/K6 clock * (2.00 plusminus 0.010) 11.1
>
> and it lists K6 at 166Mhz having already ~330Bogomips !
>
> so my AMD K6-2 at 350Mhz should have 700Bogomips isn't it ?
>
> so nex
On Sun, Jan 17, 1999 at 03:34:42PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> besides the fact it seems outdated (1997-12-13), it says like me:
> AMD K5/K6 clock * (2.00 plusminus 0.010) 11.1
>
> and it lists K6 at 166Mhz having already ~330Bogomips !
>
> so my AMD K6-2 at 350Mhz shou
On 17-Jan-99, Marcus Brinkmann took time to write :
>> One is a 350MHz and it gives me ~350 Bogomips
>> the other is a 400MHz and it gives me ~800 Bogomips
>>
>> I think there is a problem. What do you think ?
>
> No.
i think there is, see below
>> What should i check first ?
>
> Read the Bog
On Sun, Jan 17, 1999 at 11:13:41AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> One is a 350MHz and it gives me ~350 Bogomips
> the other is a 400MHz and it gives me ~800 Bogomips
>
> I think there is a problem. What do you think ?
No.
> What should i check first ?
Read the Bogomips mini-Howto.
/usr/doc/
13 matches
Mail list logo
