Re: [slightly OT] Emacs21 new features (was Re: kudos)

2001-10-25 Thread Britton
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Matthew Garman wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 01:23:03PM -0500, Josh McKinney wrote: > > > I'm a fairly experienced user (since 1988) and I'm used to doing lots > > > of customization, but I've not noticed anything annoying so far. What > > > has been very impressive is tha

Re: [slightly OT] Emacs21 new features (was Re: kudos)

2001-10-25 Thread DvB
See todays LWN weekly edition for more on emacs features (http://www.lwn.net). I found the article quite informative (like most of LWN's stuff).

Re: [slightly OT] Emacs21 new features (was Re: kudos)

2001-10-24 Thread Alan Shutko
Matthew Garman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does the new version of GNU emacs support *console mode* syntax > highlighting (I guess it's called "font locking" in emacs-speak). Yes. -- Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors! While having never invented a sin, I'm trying to pe

Re: [slightly OT] Emacs21 new features (was Re: kudos)

2001-10-24 Thread Matthew Garman
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 01:23:03PM -0500, Josh McKinney wrote: > > I'm a fairly experienced user (since 1988) and I'm used to doing lots > > of customization, but I've not noticed anything annoying so far. What > > has been very impressive is that things just work. On previous major > > upgrades (1

Re: [slightly OT] Emacs21 new features (was Re: kudos)

2001-10-24 Thread Josh McKinney
On approximately Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 01:28:09AM -0700, Jim McCloskey wrote: > > I'm a fairly experienced user (since 1988) and I'm used to doing lots > of customization, but I've not noticed anything annoying so far. What > has been very impressive is that things just work. On previous major > up