On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 01:06:15PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> Have you looked at pngcrush?
>
> apt-cache show pngcrush
No, but I'll definitely look into it for next time. Thanx!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 04:36:30PM -0600, Alan Shutko wrote:
> That looks like it's 8 bits per color, or 24 bpp. What does identify
> -verbose say about it?
It looks like you're correct. Thanx, I'll remember this if the issue
comes up again. ;-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 20:35, csj wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 16:52:09 -0600,
> Greg Norris wrote:
> >
> > I thought this might provide some much-needed amusement... My
> > wife has put together a picture of SCO's crack legal team,
> > which pretty much explains their entire strategy. Feel free to
Greg Norris wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:34:59PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
Just out of curiousity, did you originally save it as a 24-bit or
8-bit PNG? IIRC, GIFs are always 8-bit and 8-bit PNGs are comparable
in size. I can understand how a 24-bit PNG would be bigger, but I can't
see h
Greg Norris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The original image claims to be 8-bit... it's approximately 3 times the
> size of the gif version.
That looks like it's 8 bits per color, or 24 bpp. What does identify
-verbose say about it?
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - I am the rocks.
DOS Gang
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:34:59PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> Just out of curiousity, did you originally save it as a 24-bit or
> 8-bit PNG? IIRC, GIFs are always 8-bit and 8-bit PNGs are comparable
> in size. I can understand how a 24-bit PNG would be bigger, but I can't
> see how an 8-bit
Greg Norris wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:35:53AM +0800, csj wrote:
Speaking of IP hassles, maybe you should have exported that into
the free png format.
The original version was png, actually... I converted it to gif because
more browsers handle that format, and it has a significantly small
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:35:53AM +0800, csj wrote:
> Speaking of IP hassles, maybe you should have exported that into
> the free png format.
The original version was png, actually... I converted it to gif because
more browsers handle that format, and it has a significantly smaller
file size in t
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 16:52:09 -0600,
Greg Norris wrote:
>
> I thought this might provide some much-needed amusement... My
> wife has put together a picture of SCO's crack legal team,
> which pretty much explains their entire strategy. Feel free to
> share! ;-)
>
>http://home.kc.rr.com/snidely/
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 04:52:09PM -0600, Greg Norris wrote:
> I thought this might provide some much-needed amusement... My wife has
> put together a picture of SCO's crack legal team, which pretty much
> explains their entire strategy. Feel free to share! ;-)
Heh, heh, heh. He said 'crack'. Heh
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 11:52, Greg Norris wrote:
> I thought this might provide some much-needed amusement... My wife has
> put together a picture of SCO's crack legal team, which pretty much
> explains their entire strategy. Feel free to share! ;-)
>
>http://home.kc.rr.com/snidely/cornscolio.
11 matches
Mail list logo
