Re: [OT] Home UPS (was Filesystem recommendations)

2010-05-03 Thread B. Alexander
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Kelly Clowers wrote: > > For me, it is only partly about my hardware. It is also about my data. > I have backups, but I didn't used to, and I would just as soon not > have to go through a restore process. And even a simple power > outage that wouldn't harm hardware

Re: [OT] Home UPS (was Filesystem recommendations)

2010-04-29 Thread Stan Hoeppner
ow...@netptc.net put forth on 4/29/2010 2:26 PM: > Also I might have an issue with Stan's use of AND. While surge > protection of printers is a good idea, most UPS vendors advise > against connecting the printer to the UPS for power protection > Larry Most inkjets on a UPS are fine (for small jo

Re: [OT] Home UPS (was Filesystem recommendations)

2010-04-29 Thread Merciadri Luca
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > It's not because the printer makes the power unclean or otherwise interferes > with the correct functioning of the UPS while mains is working. They > recommend against connecting printers because printers draw a large amount of > power, dramatically reducing the

Re: [OT] Home UPS (was Filesystem recommendations)

2010-04-29 Thread Camaleón
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:48:03 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > On Thursday 29 April 2010 14:26:17 owens wrote: >> Also I might have an issue with Stan's use of AND. While surge >> protection of printers is a good idea, most UPS vendors advise against >> connecting the printer to the UPS for

Re: [OT] Home UPS (was Filesystem recommendations)

2010-04-29 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Thursday 29 April 2010 14:26:17 ow...@netptc.net wrote: > > Original Message > >From: zlinux...@wowway.com > >To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > >Subject: RE: [OT] Home UPS (was Filesystem recommendations) > >Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:54:47 -0400 (EDT) &g

Re: [OT] Home UPS (was Filesystem recommendations)

2010-04-29 Thread Merciadri Luca
ow...@netptc.net wrote: >> >> Original Message >> From: zlinux...@wowway.com >> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org >> Subject: RE: [OT] Home UPS (was Filesystem recommendations) >> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:54:47 -0400 (EDT) >> >> &g

RE: [OT] Home UPS (was Filesystem recommendations)

2010-04-29 Thread owens
> > > > Original Message >From: zlinux...@wowway.com >To: debian-user@lists.debian.org >Subject: RE: [OT] Home UPS (was Filesystem recommendations) >Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:54:47 -0400 (EDT) > >>On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:26:52 -0400 (EDT), Stan Hoeppne

Re: [OT] Home UPS (was Filesystem recommendations)

2010-04-29 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Kelly Clowers put forth on 4/29/2010 12:07 PM: > Furthermore most almost all power outages here are very brief, > and I end up not having to shutdown at all, which is just pure > convenience. For me, my Back-UPS XS 1000 was one of my > best computer-related purchases. I've got an old APC RM1400NE

Re: [OT] Home UPS (was Filesystem recommendations)

2010-04-29 Thread Kelly Clowers
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 08:54, Stephen Powell wrote: > On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:26:52 -0400 (EDT), Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> >> Anyway, the way I've always looked at the residential side of the UPS debate >> is to ask myself this question:  Is it worth spending $100 to surge and >> power backup protec

Re: [OT] Home UPS (was Filesystem recommendations)

2010-04-29 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Thursday 29 April 2010 10:54:47 Stephen Powell wrote: > On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:26:52 -0400 (EDT), Stan Hoeppner wrote: > > Is it worth spending $100 to > > surge and power backup protect my $1000 PC and printer? For me that > > answer is an emphatic yes. > > You make a strong case. But I come