On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> Now, the random typing is not necessary.
>
> Well, it's not as rosy as I thought, for /dev/random:
>
>
> duty@deb:~/math_work/sf/rollcalld$ time dd bs=128 c
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
> [...]
>
> Now, the random typing is not necessary.
Well, it's not as rosy as I thought, for /dev/random:
duty@deb:~/math_work/sf/rollcalld$ time dd bs=128 count=16
if=/dev/random iflag=fullblock of=randump2
16+0 レコード入力
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 12:15:22 -0700
Bob Holtzman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 04:34:50PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Friday 01 August 2014 00:41:01 pecon...@mesanetworks.net wrote:
> > > Thanks for reading
> >
> > I found it unreadable. Please let some air in!!
>
> Thank God. I thought I
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 17:49:02 +0100
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 01 August 2014 17:02:45 B wrote:
> > But you didn't say it in your rant…
>
> I didn't rant.
>
> Lisi
It's twu, it's twu! Lisi wrote two short sentences that took up less
than one line. No rant. Her point was very succinct, com
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 17:48:33 +0200
B wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 16:34:50 +0100
> Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> > On Friday 01 August 2014 00:41:01 pecon...@mesanetworks.net wrote:
> > > Thanks for reading
> >
> > I found it unreadable. Please let some air in!!
>
> This is a common deformation in
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 16:34:50 +0100
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 01 August 2014 00:41:01 pecon...@mesanetworks.net wrote:
> > Thanks for reading
>
> I found it unreadable. Please let some air in!!
>
> Lisi
LOL
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
(For Lisi and Bob and others ;-/)
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 8:41 AM, wrote:
> As many of you know, /dev/random is a source of random bits that are
> suitable for use in cryptographic analysis.
Wikipedia, stackoverflow, and other places have useful entries on
random numbers, randomness, and the pro
Okay, the following was old information. REALLY old information:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 8:41 AM, wrote:
>> As many of you know, /dev/random is a source of random bits that are
>> suitable for use
>
> some uses
>
>> in cryptographic analysis. [.
Hi,
On 01/08/14 18:06, Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 01:50:44AM +0200, B wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:41:01 -0700
>> "" wrote:
>>
>>> whatever experience you want to share.
>>
>> use haveged, it feeds /dev/random with a reservoir.
>
> I'd like to chime in that I recently
On Vi, 01 aug 14, 17:48:33, B wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 16:34:50 +0100
> Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> > On Friday 01 August 2014 00:41:01 pecon...@mesanetworks.net wrote:
> > > Thanks for reading
> >
> > I found it unreadable. Please let some air in!!
>
> This is a common deformation inducted b
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 04:34:50PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 01 August 2014 00:41:01 pecon...@mesanetworks.net wrote:
> > Thanks for reading
>
> I found it unreadable. Please let some air in!!
Thank God. I thought I'd finally lost it.
--
Bob Holtzman
Giant intergalactic brain-suckin
On Friday 01 August 2014 17:02:45 B wrote:
> But you didn't say it in your rant…
I didn't rant.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/201408011749.
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 01:50:44AM +0200, B wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:41:01 -0700
> "" wrote:
>
> > whatever experience you want to share.
>
> use haveged, it feeds /dev/random with a reservoir.
I'd like to chime in that I recently installed haveged myself and have
seen a massive incr
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 16:53:09 +0100
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> I'm glad you live in a world where everyone has 20/20 vision and
> disability is unheard of. Some of us are not so lucky. It is 15
> years since I was able to read a book.
But you didn't say it in your rant…
> Try to learn a little tolera
On Friday 01 August 2014 16:48:33 B wrote:
> Take your time and use a very old and well known cure
> as an every day mental hygiene: forget the web and use
> something made in paper called "a book"; you'll see,
> it will open your horizons and your mind ;)
I'm glad you live in a world where ev
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 16:34:50 +0100
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 01 August 2014 00:41:01 pecon...@mesanetworks.net wrote:
> > Thanks for reading
>
> I found it unreadable. Please let some air in!!
This is a common deformation inducted by the web: people
tend to reject what is more than 10 lines
On Friday 01 August 2014 00:41:01 pecon...@mesanetworks.net wrote:
> Thanks for reading
I found it unreadable. Please let some air in!!
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Le vendredi 01 août 2014 à 20:36:29 +0900, Joel Rees a écrit:
> Yes, but, ...
>
> Most I/O devices are dependent on certain kinds of timing to function.
> For instance, if you try to use the timing between cache fills on your
> hard disk, and the system for some reason reads a large block of data
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 8:41 AM, wrote:
> As many of you know, /dev/random is a source of random bits that are
> suitable for use
some uses
> in cryptographic analysis. [...]
> Just how often do you have to poke at the keyboard? And
> when you do poke at it, about how many key presses do you mak
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 4:00 PM, David Guyot
wrote:
> Le jeudi 31 juillet 2014 à 16:41:01 -0700, pecon...@mesanetworks.net a écrit:
>> not generated by the functioning of the computer, but from something
>> like the keystroke times of a human asking for help on this list. It
>> differs from /dev/ur
On Jo, 31 iul 14, 16:41:01, pecon...@mesanetworks.net wrote:
>
> Just how often do you have to poke at the keyboard? And
> when you do poke at it, about how many key presses do you make before
> you get the number of bits you requested? I'm wondering is this a
> event with which many Debianers are
Le jeudi 31 juillet 2014 à 16:41:01 -0700, pecon...@mesanetworks.net a écrit:
> not generated by the functioning of the computer, but from something
> like the keystroke times of a human asking for help on this list. It
> differs from /dev/urandom in that /dev/random blocks and does not give
> any
On 07/31/2014 04:41 PM, pecon...@mesanetworks.net wrote:
Just how often do you have to poke at the keyboard? And
when you do poke at it, about how many key presses do you make before
you get the number of bits you requested?
Whenever I do a fresh system build, I use /dev/random to generate a 32
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:41:01 -0700
"" wrote:
> whatever experience you want to share.
use haveged, it feeds /dev/random with a reservoir.
--
Pazns: U don't know about the drawer method?
Pazns: U take your schoolbag, empty it in a drawer, close it,
hop! clean up done!
Zeeln: Yeah but my
Pascal Hambourg:
> Pol Hallen a écrit :
>>
>>> /dev/random is cryptographically more secure.
>>
>> do you mean /dev/urandom is [...]?
>
> Not here.
>
>>> /dev/random is faster.
>
> But here.
> /dev/random is more random.
> /dev/urandom is faster.
Exactly, thanks. My 'u' key gets stck sometime
> Hi folks!
>
> I need create a block file, later use it like archive (with dm).
>
> What is better use?
>
> /dev/random or /dev/urandom?
>
> thanks!
>
> Pol
>
You might want to install haveged. You can use that directly without
affecting your system entropy.
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Pol Hallen a écrit :
>> Define "better".
>
> better = secure (high level of security) :-)
>
>> /dev/random is cryptographically more secure.
>
> do you mean /dev/urandom is [...]?
Not here.
>> /dev/random is faster.
But here.
/dev/random is more random.
/dev/urandom is faster.
--
To UNSUBS
Hello List,
On 21/04/13 20:04, Pol Hallen wrote:
Define "better".
better = secure (high level of security) :-)
/dev/random is cryptographically more secure.
do you mean /dev/urandom is [...]?
/dev/random is faster.
thanks!
man 4 random
Pol
hth,
Jerome
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
> Define "better".
better = secure (high level of security) :-)
> /dev/random is cryptographically more secure.
do you mean /dev/urandom is [...]?
> /dev/random is faster.
thanks!
Pol
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
Pol Hallen:
> Hi folks!
>
> I need create a block file, later use it like archive (with dm).
>
> What is better use?
>
> /dev/random or /dev/urandom?
Define "better". /dev/random is cryptographically more secure.
/dev/random is faster.
J.
--
I lust after strangers but only date people from th
On Thu Jan 14, 2010 at 01:43:39 +0100, "Stanis??aw T. Findeisen" wrote:
> I am trying to generate an SSL key using OpenSSL and /dev/random .
> However, it looks that the entropy generation rate is very low.
..
> Any ideas? You can try this:
You can see the amount of available entropy via:
31 matches
Mail list logo
