On Friday 08 October 2004 13:53, Riccardo Tortorici wrote:
> You're right, I'm sorry...
> With the same hardware (an IBM Thinkpad R40e) comparing windoze XP
> performance and the debian/kde3.3 ones it results slower with debian,
> let's say less reactive to the user...
> Is there a way to optimize
On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 16:34:48 +0200, Riccardo Tortorici
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrea Vettorello wrote:
>
> > The prelink command will "only" try to reduce loading time of programs
> > (for details look in the prelink documentation).
>
> I read the documentation and it will be sufficient to
Andrea Vettorello wrote:
The prelink command will "only" try to reduce loading time of programs
(for details look in the prelink documentation).
I read the documentation and it will be sufficient to reduce te start
time of any application (just a first goal, let's say..), unfortunately
i didn't n
On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 14:53:10 +0200, Riccardo Tortorici
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're right, I'm sorry...
> With the same hardware (an IBM Thinkpad R40e) comparing windoze XP
> performance and the debian/kde3.3 ones it results slower with debian,
> let's say less reactive to the user...
> Is t
It was an answer to another user on another debian ML (as I said), i
forwarded my question also here cause i wasn't able to find the solution...
Unfortunately I already configured my video card, i don't use a generic
driver... Someone told me to upgrade from XFree 4.3.0.1 to Xorg and do
not use
Riccardo Tortorici wrote:
You're right, I'm sorry...
It sounds like you are responding to something, but there doesn't seem
to be any clue as to what in your mail headers.
With the same hardware (an IBM Thinkpad R40e) comparing windoze XP
performance and the debian/kde3.3 ones it results slower
6 matches
Mail list logo
