"D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Haven't you ever done a dselect update and then a apt-get -u upgrade
> and found that you have 30 or some large number of packages that are
> not going to be installed?
Not really; apt-get isn't intended to be used that way. See the first
paragraph of apt-get(8
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 06:32:49AM -0700, D. wrote:
> Haven't you ever done a dselect update and then a
> apt-get -u upgrade and found that you have 30 or some
> large number of packages that are not going to be
> installed?
Ah, in that case, it's nor
--- Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> - From what to what?
>
Haven't you ever done a dselect update and then a
apt-get -u upgrade and found that you have 30 or some
large number of packages that are not going to be
installed? When that ha
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:59:23AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 09:24:06PM +1300, Paul William wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 17:26, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 09:57:59AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > > > Fellows, it's time for a dist-upgrade, but
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 09:24:06PM +1300, Paul William wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 17:26, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 09:57:59AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > > Fellows,
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 17:26, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 09:57:59AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > Fellows, it's time for a dist-upgrade, but
>
> - From what to what?
dist-upgrade is just an upgrade that resolves the more comp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 09:57:59AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Fellows, it's time for a dist-upgrade, but
- From what to what?
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :
`. `'` proud Debian admin and user
`- Debian - when y
* Rachel Andrew ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
>
> > "apt-get dist-upgrade" should do the trick.
>
> Hi, that did work but when unpacking this happens:
>
> Unpacking replacement konqueror ...
> Preparing to replace libkonq3 4:2.2.1.0-6 (using
> .../libkonq3_4%3a2.2.2-13_i386.deb) ...
> Unpac
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002 11:12:20 + Rachel Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I tried to do apt-get upgrade of my Woody system today and got the following
> message:
>
> The following packages have been kept back:
> base-config console-data kate kchart kdebase kdebase-libs kdm kfocus kivio
> "apt-get dist-upgrade" should do the trick.
Hi, that did work but when unpacking this happens:
Unpacking replacement konqueror ...
Preparing to replace libkonq3 4:2.2.1.0-6 (using
.../libkonq3_4%3a2.2.2-13_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libkonq3 ...
Preparing to replace kdebase-libs 4:2.
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 07:59:06AM -0500, Bill Benedetto wrote:
> >>> Rachel Andrew writes:
>
> Rachel> I tried to do apt-get upgrade of my Woody system today
> Rachel> and got the following message:
> Rachel>
> Rachel> The following packages have been kept back:
> Rachel> base-config co
>>> Rachel Andrew writes:
Rachel> I tried to do apt-get upgrade of my Woody system today
Rachel> and got the following message:
Rachel>
Rachel> The following packages have been kept back:
Rachel> base-config console-data kate kchart kdebase
Rachel> kdebase-libs kdm kfocus kivio kmid ko
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 01:30:41PM -0500, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 06:53:16PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > aalib1: Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.2-2) but 2.1.3-18 is to be installed
> >
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 08:55:40PM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 01:30:41PM -0500, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> > On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 06:53:16PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > How do I get it to upgrade my libc6?
> >
> > For some reason, apt doesn't want to upgrade lib
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 01:30:41PM -0500, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 06:53:16PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > aalib1: Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.2-2) but 2.1.3-18 is to be installed
> >
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 06:53:16PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
> aalib1: Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.2-2) but 2.1.3-18 is to be installed
>
> Depends: xlibs (>= 4.0.1-11) but i
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 10:16:45AM -0500, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 03:16:55PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > What is going on, and why can't apt-get upgrade the remaining 62 packages?
> > How do I get it to upgrade them?
>
> It doesn't want to automatically process them
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 03:16:55PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What is going on, and why can't apt-get upgrade the remaining 62 packages?
> How do I get it to upgrade them?
It doesn't want to automatically process them for some reason. Explicitly
telling it to upgrade each package with `apt
18 matches
Mail list logo