Le Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:46:10 +0100 Dominique Dumont
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Nicolas FRANCOIS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I tried to preload radeon and agpgart modules, but nothing changed.
> > Glxinfo tells me dri is off.
>
> I rememeber that I had DRI problem if I loaded these mod
2005/11/21, Jose Salavert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The installer detected my radeon 9000 during installation and used the
> kernel dri module. It is a supported card, you should not have any
> problem.
>
> How is your X11 config file, it must load glx module and others, your
> driver is "radeon" or "
Nicolas FRANCOIS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I tried to preload radeon and agpgart modules, but nothing changed.
> Glxinfo tells me dri is off.
I rememeber that I had DRI problem if I loaded these modules in the
wrong order.
You should try to load agpgart *before* radeon module.
HTH
--
Dom
Hi.
I just installed a Debian Sarge on my computer. I usually use a Linux From
Scratch, so I'm new to Debian. I'd like to get DRI work with XFree, but
allways get this message :
(WW) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP not available
I tried to preload radeon and agpgart modules, but nothing changed.
Glxinfo te
On Saturday 10 April 2004 12:22, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 12:14:28PM +0200, Pim Bliek wrote:
> > However, Elimar Riesebieter pointed me in the right direction by sending
> > his X config, and hinting about drm.
> >
> > After compiling drm into the kernel the problem went a
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 12:14:28PM +0200, Pim Bliek wrote:
> However, Elimar Riesebieter pointed me in the right direction by sending his X
> config, and hinting about drm.
>
> After compiling drm into the kernel the problem went away.
>
> Pim
Pim, at what step in the configuration of the kern
> > Symptoms: X starts, but the image is white-ish. I can just read
> > it... It looks like someone tuned up brightness to an insane
> > level... Not workable..
>
> Start with a properly adjusted monitor. Start off with the contrast
> all the way up, and the brightness all the way down. Reduce t
Pim Bliek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am having a problem with my X config. I am trying to fix it for
> some hours now, and I am LOST.
>
> Symptoms: X starts, but the image is white-ish. I can just read
> it... It looks like someone tuned up brightness to an insane
> level... Not workable..
S
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 the mental interface of
Pim Bliek told:
> Hi,
>
> I am having a problem with my X config. I am trying to fix it for some hours
> now, and I am LOST.
>
> Symptoms: X starts, but the image is white-ish. I can just read it... It looks
> like someone tuned up brightness to an
Hi,
I am having a problem with my X config. I am trying to fix it for some hours
now, and I am LOST.
Symptoms: X starts, but the image is white-ish. I can just read it... It looks
like someone tuned up brightness to an insane level... Not workable..
I know it can work, I had it working -witho
VESA driver, but obviously it's kind of pants. Then
> again it helps me get away from WinXP...
>
> Antony
Coming into this very late, but I booted knoppix and it detected my
Radeon 9000 Pro and set it up with DRI support. I installed it to
harddisk.
ii xfree86-common 4.3.0-0ds4
>> Antony Gelberg wrote:
>> > Maybe not. The site is NLA. I've emailed Daniel Stone to see where
>> > his Woody backports live these days, meanwhile if anyone knows where
>> > they are, please feel free to share!
>> >
>> > Antony
>>
>> Right - apparently apt-get.org is wrong and Daniel never had
--- Antony Gelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> > --- Antony Gelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I'm trying to get XFree86 going with my Radeon 9000 Pro in Woody.
> >>
> >
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 01:45:21AM +0100, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> Antony Gelberg wrote:
> > Maybe not. The site is NLA. I've emailed Daniel Stone to see where
> > his Woody backports live these days, meanwhile if anyone knows where
> > they are, please feel free to share!
> >
> > Antony
>
> Righ
Antony Gelberg wrote:
> Maybe not. The site is NLA. I've emailed Daniel Stone to see where
> his Woody backports live these days, meanwhile if anyone knows where
> they are, please feel free to share!
>
> Antony
Right - apparently apt-get.org is wrong and Daniel never had any XF86 4.3
for Woody.
Antony Gelberg wrote:
> Roberto Sanchez wrote:
>> --- Antony Gelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to get XFree86 going with my Radeon 9000 Pro in Woody.
>>>
>>
>> There is your problem. The Rade
Hi Yall & Antony,
who is having some grief, with his Radeon 9000 Pro (full text below).
My previous card is a Power Colour Radeon 9000 Pro & I am now on a 9500
Pro.
I had my Radeon 9000 Pro up last year, using the DRI project stuff & it
is good for 2D & ok for 3D.
Now for a q
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> --- Antony Gelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm trying to get XFree86 going with my Radeon 9000 Pro in Woody.
>>
>
> There is your problem. The Radeon 9000 Pro is too new for that
> X-server. It is
--- Antony Gelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to get XFree86 going with my Radeon 9000 Pro in Woody.
>
There is your problem. The Radeon 9000 Pro is too new for that X-server. It
is even too new for the version of the X-server in Sarge
Hi all,
I'm trying to get XFree86 going with my Radeon 9000 Pro in Woody.
Here's the X output:
> (--) Assigning device section with no busID to primary device
> (WW) RADEON: No matching Device section for instance (BusID PCI:1:0:1)
found
> (EE) No devices detected.
> Fa
Elimar Riesebieter schrob:
> > 127MB HIGHMEM available.
> > 896MB LOWMEM available.
> I'm not shure, but there is a similar higmem-bug in radeonfb as in
> vesafb. Try booting with mem=845M or something like that.
Ah, well, this seemed to be the problem. Now I got still some other
annoying proble
On Fri, 04 Jul 2003 the mental interface of
Jan Tammen told:
> Bonjour.
>
> Trying to set up the framebuffer with my Radeon 9000 Pro on a 2.5.69
> Kernel (Debian sid). But it seems the framebuffer can not be
> initialized, as the resolution does not change.
[...]
>
>
Bonjour.
Trying to set up the framebuffer with my Radeon 9000 Pro on a 2.5.69
Kernel (Debian sid). But it seems the framebuffer can not be
initialized, as the resolution does not change.
Kernel-config:
#
# Graphics support
#
CONFIG_FB=y
CONFIG_VIDEO_SELECT=y
CONFIG_FB_RADEON=y
#
# Console
Haralambos Geortgilakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HI All & Peter,
>
> Whoops, I meant to type in 9000, in a crucial sentence & did not
>
> Just to bee clear, I have a Power Color Radeon 9000 Pro 128 & the DRI stuff
> gets it going in Tux!
>
> N
HI All & Peter,
Whoops, I meant to type in 9000, in a crucial sentence & did not
Just to bee clear, I have a Power Color Radeon 9000 Pro 128 & the DRI
stuff gets it going in Tux!
Now, download & enjoy! :-)
*BFN*
Greek Geek :-)
http://bofhcam.org/co-larters/lart-refe
supports the 9000 Pro (It
stops at 8500/R200). You have a 9000 Pro? This works with XFree 4.2.1?
Thanks!
> >My brother gave me a 128MB Radeon 9000 Pro for Christmas to replace my
> >aging 8MB Matrox G200. Does anyone here have one?
> >
> >For drivers, ATI distributes a bi
> That got mine to work. I also have a (not thoroughly or properly edited)
>
> tutorial/howto type thing at http://www.double-
> helix.org/debian/ATIRadeonDeb.html for the ATI Radeon 7000, but it might
>
> possibly help.
Make that:
http://www.double-helix.org/debian/ATIRadeon7000Deb.html
--
> Section "Module"
> Load"GLcore"
> Load"bitmap"
> Load"dbe"
> Load"ddc"
> Load"dri"
> Load"extmod"
> Load"freetype"
> Load"glx"#I tried to comment this out too, still no
> loading ATI stuff:-(.
> Load"int10"
>
uot; "1024x768" "800x600"
EndSubSection
SubSection "Display"
Depth8
Modes"1152x864" "1024x768" "800x600"
EndSubSection
SubSection "Display"
Depth15
Modes "1
My brother gave me a 128MB Radeon 9000 Pro for Christmas to replace my
aging 8MB Matrox G200. Does anyone here have one?
For drivers, ATI distributes a binary RPM package here:
http://mirror.ati.com/support/drivers/linux/radeon-linux.html
which says:
"Fixed in this driver:
* fglrxc
Hi All,
Ive just tried to get my Radeon card going, by using the
Option "ChipId 0x4242"
in my Xfree86 config file, with XFree86-4.2.xx, viz the lastest deb's &
had no joy :-(
Any hints most greatfully & needfully accpeted!
Greek Geek
The easiest way to figure the cost of living is to ta
31 matches
Mail list logo
