Jim writes:
> Does the existence of `testing' mean that `proposed-updates' is (in
> effect anyway) redundant?
As I understand it they have nothing to do with each other. 'Proposed
updates' is for proposed updates to stable: security fixes, critical bug
fixes, etc. Packages are uploaded to it when
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 03:43:46PM -0800, Jim McCloskey wrote:
>
> |> So will testing always be available? I like the idea. I'm just not
> |> used to packages being rolled back in a release. But if I have
> |> apt-get always looking at testing, maybe that's what will make me
> |> happy.
>
> Does
On 12-Jan-2001 Jim McCloskey wrote:
>
>|> So will testing always be available? I like the idea. I'm just not
>|> used to packages being rolled back in a release. But if I have
>|> apt-get always looking at testing, maybe that's what will make me
>|> happy.
>
> Does the existence of `testing' mea
3 matches
Mail list logo
