On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 07:48:29AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Debian 3.0
>
> Usage: update-alternatives --install
>
> [--slave ] ...
>
> is the name in /etc/alternatives.
> is the name referred to.
> is the link pointing to /etc/alternatives/.
> is an integer; options with higher
Yes, it is installed.
> Bob Proulxwrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It looks correct, however, when I do a vi , vim is
> still launched instead of gvim.
>
Did you install 'vim-gtk'? I don't use vim myself (emacs user) but I
understand from others that you need vim-gtk in order to get the
graphic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It looks correct, however, when I do a vi , vim is
> still launched instead of gvim.
Did you install 'vim-gtk'? I don't use vim myself (emacs user) but I
understand from others that you need vim-gtk in order to get the
graphical frontend. Sorry but I did not try it mys
I followed your instructions... here is what I get when I did a
update-alternatives --display vi :
david:/etc/alternatives# update-alternatives --display vi
vi - status is auto.
link currently points to /usr/bin/gvim
/usr/bin/nvi - priority 30
slave vi.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/nvi.1.gz
/usr/bin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm trying to update my /usr/bin/vi to use gvim instead of vim.
Hmm... I personally think a symlink or wrapper in /usr/local/bin
would be easiest and most appropriate. It is a local configuration
for you but not really part of the system. YMMV.
> david:/home/david# u
On Mon, 2002-12-23 at 11:26, Fred wrote:
> > Ola!
> >
> > I'm having a problem with symbolic links. I have used the ln - s without any
> > problem for some time, but everytime i try to stick the /tmp to /var/tmp
> > with ln - s /var/tmp /tmp it works until i reboot my machine. When i turn on
> > my
> Ola!
>
> I'm having a problem with symbolic links. I have used the ln - s without any
> problem for some time, but everytime i try to stick the /tmp to /var/tmp
> with ln - s /var/tmp /tmp it works until i reboot my machine. When i turn on
> my computer i loose always that link but keep the othe
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 09:39:33AM -0800, Mike Egglestone wrote:
> .Apr 1 2001 mail -> ../mail
>
> My question:
> I'm guessing that the file "mail" is linked to here: /var/mail
> but the above output doesn't tell me that.
Yes it does. It tells you that, if you're in /var/spool, 'mail' and
'.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Egglestone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: segunda-feira, 26 de Novembro de 2001 17:40
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: symbolic links
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I was running this command:
>
> ls -l
>
> in here:
>
> /var/spool/
>
> The file "m
> How does one remove a symbolic link to say /dev/ttyS0 or /dev/hdc.
> This is not clear in any literature I have seen, although under 'rm'
> and its '--directory' option there is mention of 'unlink' but no
> further reference is made to this anywhere and I doubt it's relevant.
You do use "rm". Do
> How does one remove a symbolic link to say /dev/ttyS0 or /dev/hdc.
If you did ln -s /dev/ttyS0 /dev/that_link
so rm /dev/that_link will work fine :)
> If I need to recreate /dev/ttySx or /dev/hdx which 'ls -l' show as
> crw-rw and brw-rw respectively, how would I go about
> doing so?
"john gennard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How does one remove a symbolic link to say /dev/ttyS0 or /dev/hdc.
> This is not clear in any literature I have seen, although under 'rm'
> and its '--directory' option there is mention of 'unlink' but no
> further reference is made to this anywhere an
On Mon, Apr 12, 1999 at 04:11:34PM +0200, Ruben Leote Mendes wrote:
> Hello James,
> > Umm, perhaps I'm missing somthing, but I once had to do a similar thing. I
> > simply mounted the new partition in /hdd2, and created symlinks
> > /home->/hdd2/home, /usr/local->/hdd2/usr/local. Nested symlinks
Hello James,
> Umm, perhaps I'm missing somthing, but I once had to do a similar thing. I
> simply mounted the new partition in /hdd2, and created symlinks
> /home->/hdd2/home, /usr/local->/hdd2/usr/local. Nested symlinks are
> perfectly legal. (Indeed, when the kernel went to dcache, there wer
Hello Gary,
On Thu, Apr 08, 1999 at 12:57:03PM -0700, Gary Singleton wrote:
> Take a look at the "symlinks" package first - I forget
> it's capabilities but it just might do this for you.
> IIRC it's in utils.
When I saw the description in the .deb file I thought it was exactly
what I was lookin
--- Ruben Leote Mendes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Adam,
>
> On Tue, Apr 06, 1999 at 01:09:57PM -0700, Adam Klein
> wrote:
>
> > Why don't you just mount the parition under
> /usr/local?
>
> The main reason is because I want to put several
> directories in the
> same partition. I create
On Thu, Apr 08, 1999 at 05:42:38PM +0200, Ruben Leote Mendes wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 1999 at 01:09:57PM -0700, Adam Klein wrote:
> > Why don't you just mount the parition under /usr/local?
> The main reason is because I want to put several directories in the
> same partition. I create several dir
Hello Adam,
On Tue, Apr 06, 1999 at 01:09:57PM -0700, Adam Klein wrote:
> Why don't you just mount the parition under /usr/local?
The main reason is because I want to put several directories in the
same partition. I create several directories in the partition and
then make symbolic links there.
On Tue, Apr 06, 1999 at 05:05:55PM +0200, Ruben Leote Mendes wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My /usr/local directory is mounted in /mnt/local.
> If I cd to /usr/local and type "ls .." it lists the contents of /mnt
> and not of /usr as I would expect. Is this the normal behaviour?
> All relative symbolic links
On 13 Feb 1998, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>Can anyone tell me how to properly create
>a link from the anonymous ftp/pub directory
>to another directory located on the same or
>on a different file system.
>
> You can't create symbolic links out of the anonftp directory, at least
> not worki
Can anyone tell me how to properly create
a link from the anonymous ftp/pub directory
to another directory located on the same or
on a different file system.
You can't create symbolic links out of the anonftp directory, at least
not working ones. This is because the daemon runs "chroo
21 matches
Mail list logo
