On Thu, Sep 09, 1999 at 06:59:12PM -0400, Marshal Wong wrote:
>
> Could somebody send me the long listing of the root directory? I need
> the proper permissions for /tmp since I fiddled around with it, and
> now all the permissions are wrong. Thanks!
>
> Marshal
>
There was a discussion abou
On 09-Sep-99 Marshal Wong wrote:
>
> Could somebody send me the long listing of the root directory? I need
> the proper permissions for /tmp since I fiddled around with it, and
> now all the permissions are wrong. Thanks!
>
Here ya go.
root
Description: Binary data
Hi,
On Tue, 25 May, 1999 à 11:51:00PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> Pollywog wrote:
> >
> >On 25-May-99 scratch wrote:
> >The sticky bit (chmod +t) on a directory just makes it so that anyone can
> wr
> >ite
> >to that directory but not modify files they did not make.
>
> Not qu
On Tue, 25 May 1999, Ben Collins wrote:
> c) some other program you installed (from source or tar ball) has changed it.
i accidentally did that once. Most tar filed i've come across create a
single directory for all the files contained, but this one didn't. It did
change the permissions on '.', h
Pollywog wrote:
>
>On 25-May-99 scratch wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 May 1999, Pollywog wrote:
>>
>>> Do you have the sticky bit set? Try it.
>>
>> I've always wondered what the meaning of the sticky bit is. Does it have
>> something to do with enforcing group ownership on files created,
On 25-May-99 Pollywog wrote:
>
> On 25-May-99 moron wrote:
>>
>> >
>> Pardon my ignorance, but what the hell is the sticky bit? Sounds
>> disgusting
>>:<)
>>
>> David
>
> chmod +t
>
> I don't recall the numeric equivalent but I believe someone gave it in a
> previous post.
I believe I wa
On 25-May-99 moron wrote:
>
>
> Pardon my ignorance, but what the hell is the sticky bit? Sounds disgusting
>:<)
>
> David
chmod +t
I don't recall the numeric equivalent but I believe someone gave it in a
previous post.
--
Andrew
On 25-May-99 scratch wrote:
> On Tue, 25 May 1999, Pollywog wrote:
>
>> Do you have the sticky bit set? Try it.
>
> I've always wondered what the meaning of the sticky bit is. Does it have
> something to do with enforcing group ownership on files created, or am I
> way off here?
The sticky bit
>On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 09:32:36PM +0200, moron wrote:
>> I'm trying to find my way around Debian (hamm) and see that a user cannot
>> use man, which is refused permission to create a /tmp file. Changing
>> permissions with >chmod a+w /tmp< from root solves the problem. (I tried
>> creating a
On Tue, 25 May 1999, Pollywog wrote:
> Do you have the sticky bit set? Try it.
I've always wondered what the meaning of the sticky bit is. Does it have
something to do with enforcing group ownership on files created, or am I
way off here?
Thanks,
-- scratch
--:: Nico Galoppo ::---
On 25-May-99 moron wrote:
> I'm trying to find my way around Debian (hamm) and see that a user cannot
> use man, which is refused permission to create a /tmp file. Changing
> permissions with >chmod a+w /tmp< from root solves the problem. (I tried
> creating a /tmp directory in my home directory
On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 09:32:36PM +0200, moron wrote:
> I'm trying to find my way around Debian (hamm) and see that a user cannot
> use man, which is refused permission to create a /tmp file. Changing
> permissions with >chmod a+w /tmp< from root solves the problem. (I tried
> creating a /tmp di
12 matches
Mail list logo
