Re: exim and relaying -- for ONE user

will trillich wrote: > could you be a little less specific? (just kidding. ;) > > "You set up your server to support TLS"... at which point i > start slamming the oven door on my head again. Really, it's not that hard. apt-get install -tls. They set up certs for you. I went the extra mile to set

Re: exim and relaying -- for ONE user

On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:58:50PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > will trillich wrote: > > is there some way to further restrict the relaying? i DO NOT > > want any black hats turning my server into spam-o-rama. > > ideas welcome. > > As an alternative to the SMTP auth stuff proposed by others, I > sug

Re: exim and relaying -- for ONE user

will trillich wrote: > then he can certainly send email from @serensoft to @out-there > but then SO CAN ANYBODY ELSE using that small, tiny, > insignificant worldnet.att.net network (of thousands and > thousands). > > is there some way to further restrict the relaying? i DO NOT want > any black ha

Re: exim and relaying -- for ONE user

On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 06:51, will trillich wrote: > 5:05am? whassa matter, couldn't sleep? (that's *my* problem -- > one of them, anyway...) > (I get most of my best work done after 2 am. :) > i noticed (below) you used "basic" instead of "plain" so i > munged my setup to match: Actually, that w

Re: exim and relaying -- for ONE user

Pardon me for coming into the middle of this thread, but I now need to set up secure relaying on my stable box running Exim. If I read the messages back from the EHLO command correctly, the "regular" Exim package is not compiled with authentication options enabled. This means, does it not, th

Re: exim and relaying -- for ONE user

5:05am? whassa matter, couldn't sleep? (that's *my* problem -- one of them, anyway...) On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 05:05:32AM -0600, Alex Malinovich wrote: > It's a very complicated and technical discovery process that I > have dubbed "guessing". :) (Actually, the best way is to use > exim -bh to test

Re: exim and relaying -- for ONE user

On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 00:56, will trillich wrote: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 06:10:52PM -0600, Alex Malinovich wrote: > > On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 16:09, will trillich wrote: As for your > > earlier post about the auth not working, have you checked to > > see if you have libpam-pwdfile installed? I jus

Re: exim and relaying -- for ONE user

On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 06:10:52PM -0600, Alex Malinovich wrote: > On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 16:09, will trillich wrote: As for your > earlier post about the auth not working, have you checked to > see if you have libpam-pwdfile installed? I just set up SMTP > plain auth last night following the direct

Re: exim and relaying -- for ONE user

On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 09:07:55PM -0600, Gary Turner wrote: > >anybody got a pointer to an english version of how to set up > >smtp authentication via exim 3.3? > > I won't pretend to own a clue, myself. Maybe you should try > the O'Reilly book, _Exim_, "Official Guide For Release 3", by > Phili

Re: exim and relaying -- for ONE user

will trillich wrote: >On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 12:37:32AM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 08:48:17PM -0600, will trillich wrote: >> | On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 03:59:40PM -0500, Jeremy Gaddis wrote: >> | > SMTP Authentication sounds like a prime candidate. [...] > >no

Re: exim and relaying -- for ONE user

On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 04:09:10PM -0600, will trillich wrote: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 12:37:32AM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 08:48:17PM -0600, will trillich wrote: > > | well it sounds good. isn't that what exim already does? (i guess > > | not. lead on, mcduf

Re: exim and relaying -- for ONE user

On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 16:09, will trillich wrote: --snip-- > right. here's why people (read as 'non-geeks') insist that > documentation is lacking in the linux world: --snip-- > > no clue given HOW to determine which "available authenticators" > are supplied, WHAT they might be called, nor HOW TO

Re: exim and relaying -- for ONE user

On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 12:37:32AM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 08:48:17PM -0600, will trillich wrote: > | On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 03:59:40PM -0500, Jeremy Gaddis wrote: > | > SMTP Authentication sounds like a prime candidate. > | > | well it sounds good. isn't tha

Re: exim and relaying -- for ONE user

On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 12:37:32AM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > Are you still using exim 3? (probably, the DD is behind on the releases) yup -- server ESMTP Exim 3.35 #1 Thu, 30 Jan 2003 13:43:20 -0600 [whatever's standard on woody...] root: /etc/exim# exim -bh 24.128.69.142

Re: exim and relaying -- for ONE user

Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 10:59:46AM +0100, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > | Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > | > | > Note, however, that AUTH PLAIN isn't very secure. You should only > | > allow it if the client has first initiated a TLS connection. That > | > requires firs

Re: exim and relaying -- for ONE user

On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 10:59:46AM +0100, Hendrik Sattler wrote: | Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: | | > Note, however, that AUTH PLAIN isn't very secure. You should only | > allow it if the client has first initiated a TLS connection. That | > requires first setting up TLS. I don't know if exim 3

Re: exim and relaying -- for ONE user

Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: > Note, however, that AUTH PLAIN isn't very secure. You should only > allow it if the client has first initiated a TLS connection. That > requires first setting up TLS. I don't know if exim 3 can restrict it > to a TLS session only, or how to do it. Either read the

Re: exim and relaying -- for ONE user

On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 08:48:17PM -0600, will trillich wrote: | On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 03:59:40PM -0500, Jeremy Gaddis wrote: | > SMTP Authentication sounds like a prime candidate. | | well it sounds good. isn't that what exim already does? (i guess | not. lead on, mcduff!) Yeah, once you confi

Re: exim and relaying -- for ONE user

On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 03:59:40PM -0500, Jeremy Gaddis wrote: > SMTP Authentication sounds like a prime candidate. well it sounds good. isn't that what exim already does? (i guess not. lead on, mcduff!) -- I use Debian/GNU Linux version 3.0; Linux server 2.4.20-k6 #1 Mon Jan 13 23:49:14 EST 200

RE: exim and relaying -- for ONE user

SMTP Authentication sounds like a prime candidate. j. -- Jeremy L. Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -Original Message- > From: will trillich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: exim and relay

Re: exim and relaying -- for ONE user

On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 11:30:35 -0600 will trillich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > looking for a way to accept HARDLY ANY relays -- hopefully more > than just "anybody from worldnet.att.net"... > > i've got a partner who'd like to be able to send email from > serensoft.com -- but he's way out in the n