On 5/8/08, NN_il_Confusionario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 05:18:45PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Does it help defining in /etc/hosts the http hosts of your sources.list ?
> >
> > I can try that, but I've never done that before.
>
> well, try it, it is not diffico
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 05:18:45PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Does it help defining in /etc/hosts the http hosts of your sources.list ?
>
> I can try that, but I've never done that before.
well, try it, it is not difficoult. I am not assuring that this will
solve the problem, I am saying
On 5/7/08, NN_il_Confusionario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 12:46:23PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On 5/6/08, NN_il_Confusionario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > strace -f -o /tmp/apt-get.log apt-get update
> > http://wa9als.com/apt-get.log
>
> In this strace I
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 12:46:23PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 5/6/08, NN_il_Confusionario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > strace -f -o /tmp/apt-get.log apt-get update
> http://wa9als.com/apt-get.log
In this strace I am not able to see any _obvious_ cause for your error
(such as strang
On 5/6/08, NN_il_Confusionario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:11:46PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > strace -f -o /tmp/apt-get.log apt-get update
> > Any other ideas? - John
>
> yes, post (or, better, make it avilable on a web server) the file
> /tmp/apt-get.log whe
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:11:46PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > strace -f -o /tmp/apt-get.log apt-get update
> Any other ideas? - John
yes, post (or, better, make it avilable on a web server) the file
/tmp/apt-get.log where strace has put its debug information.
Moreover, what happened whe
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 08:34:56AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > getent hosts ftp.us.debian.org
> > getent hosts security.debian.org
> > getent hosts www.google.com
> > getent hosts www.wikipedia.org
>
> Those return the expected results!
>
> The problem seems to be specific to apt-get an
On 5/5/08, NN_il_Confusionario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >On 5/5/08, NN_il_Confusionario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> then check apt configuration files in /etc/apt/ and subdirectories
> >> (proxy or other unusual configuration settings?
> * From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On 5/5/08, NN_il_Confusionario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> then check apt configuration files in /etc/apt/ and subdirectories
>> (proxy or other unusual configuration settings? corrupted files?)
>
>I don't see any problems there.
But it semm
On 5/5/08, NN_il_Confusionario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >The problem seems to be specific to apt-get and aptitude.
>
> then check apt configuration files in /etc/apt/ and subdirectories
> (proxy or other unusual configuration settings? cor
> * From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>The problem seems to be specific to apt-get and aptitude.
then check apt configuration files in /etc/apt/ and subdirectories
(proxy or other unusual configuration settings? corrupted files?)
And post the complete and exact outpt of apt-get /
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 07:49:59AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On a recently restored etch server, I can't apt-get update because it
> can't resolve anything in my sources.list, e.g. ftp.us.debian.org.
> Right after I did a fresh etch install, update worked fine, but now
> after restoring my
On 5/5/08, NN_il_Confusionario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >On a recently restored etch server, I can't apt-get update because it
> >can't resolve anything in my sources.list, e.g. ftp.us.debian.org.
>
> (1) check the correctness of /etc/reso
> * From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On a recently restored etch server, I can't apt-get update because it
>can't resolve anything in my sources.list, e.g. ftp.us.debian.org.
(1) check the correctness of /etc/resolv.conf
(2) correct /etc/resolv.conf and then try again
If you hav
El Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 10:59:26AM +0100, Albrecht Frank dijo:
-| Nick wrote:
-| >
-| > Hi list,
-| >
-| > I have an internal network setup behind linux on a single static IP
-| > I am having problem reolving names but can ping IP's numericaly.
-| >
-| > I set up dhcp to allocate 192.168.1.0/24
Nick wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> I have an internal network setup behind linux on a single static IP
> I am having problem reolving names but can ping IP's numericaly.
>
> I set up dhcp to allocate 192.168.1.0/24 throught the internal network
> Then I setup ipchains very basic, just to get it all go
Nick wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> I have an internal network setup behind linux on a single static IP
> I am having problem reolving names but can ping IP's numericaly.
>
> I set up dhcp to allocate 192.168.1.0/24 throught the internal network
> Then I setup ipchains very basic, just to get it all go
hi nic
if yu can ping using the ip#...
just add your "dns server ip#" into /etc/resolv.conf
c ya
alvin
On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Nick wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have an internal network setup behind linux on a single static IP
> I am having problem reolving names but can ping IP's numericaly.
>
> I
On 05-Oct-99 tf wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I seem to have lost my ablity to resolve. I attempted without
> success to install the web server xitami. Don't know if that had
> anything to do with it, but now, when I connect, neither netscape
> nor lynx can find any site unless I specify the ip addres
Juhani Luhtanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm probably missing the obvious here but could someone help me out.
No, it's a bug with the boot disks you're using (I *assume* you're running
this off a boot disk, since that's the only context I've heard of this error
occurring). They contain a str
20 matches
Mail list logo