www.afterstep.org...
i love it!!!
Camilo Olarte
- Original Message -
From: "David Z Maze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 06:44 PM
Subject: Which window manager to use?
> I can't seem to find a window manager I like. I'm not actually picky
> on the appearance, s
>
>> -- Straightforward graphical configuration.
>
> native simple option menus
>
some things still require hand editing of a rc but that is minimal. bbconf
also exists to aid graphical configuring.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> Of the items listed, blackbox does a good number of them natively (or with
> one or two helper apps):
I find fluxbox (which is based on blackbox 0.61) far preferable to
blackbox, openbox, or the others in that family. It has some nice new
features, such as window tabs an
David Z Maze wrote:
I can't seem to find a window manager I like. I'm not actually picky
on the appearance, so long as it's not garishly ugly (for example, any
of the Enlightenment themes). I'm running unstable on every machine
this matters for; I'm also willing to consider things that aren't
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 19:44:49 -0400
"David Z Maze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't seem to find a window manager I like. I'm not actually picky
> on the appearance, so long as it's not garishly ugly (for example, any
> of the Enlightenment themes).
(snip)
> Requirements:
>
Of the items li
also sprach Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.03.25.1748 +0100]:
> How do I do this if I'm starting galeon from .xinitrc/.xsession?
while true; do galeon; done
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
Karsten M. Self wrote:
on Mon, Mar 25, 2002, Kent West ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Thanks for everyone's response. I think for now I'll stick with ICEWM,
and just disable the Menu Bar, although this discussion gave me some
food for thought, so I may change the setup in the future.
Karsten M.
on Mon, Mar 25, 2002, Kent West ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Thanks for everyone's response. I think for now I'll stick with ICEWM,
> and just disable the Menu Bar, although this discussion gave me some
> food for thought, so I may change the setup in the future.
>
> Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > -
Thanks for everyone's response. I think for now I'll stick with ICEWM,
and just disable the Menu Bar, although this discussion gave me some
food for thought, so I may change the setup in the future.
Karsten M. Self wrote:
> - have galeon automatically restart if it exits
How do I do this if I'
> new window is opened by the web site being visited, and I would prefer
> the window to just take the entire screen or at least not require manual
> placement.
Try to look at larswm.
--
Alexey
"Python is executable pseudocode, Perl is executable line-noise."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
on Wed, Mar 20, 2002, Danie Roux ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 12:25:50PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > Galeon, in full screen tabbed mode, with *no* window manager, would be
> > my first choice.
>
> You need a window manager for Galeon fullscreen. If you get to a login
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 12:25:50PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> Galeon, in full screen tabbed mode, with *no* window manager, would be
> my first choice.
You need a window manager for Galeon fullscreen. If you get to a login
screen, input moves to it. After you've logged in, you loose keyboard
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Karsten Heymann wrote:
> - use no window manager
> - start galeon in fullscreen mode from .xinitrc or .xsession
> - map away the F11-Key with xmodmap
> - maybe disable C-A-F[1-12]
> - maybe disable C-A-Backspace
> - disable most mime stuff to prevent the start of externa
You can launch your startup app from /etc/inittab. I used to work for
a company that installed kiosks, and this is how we did it. We ran
our own app, not a browser, and our X needs were very minimal. No
window manager, no windows except our one, no keyboard, no mouse
(touchscreen only), etc. Ju
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 13:22:02 -0600
ktb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 11:41:35AM -0600, Kent West wrote:
> > Which window manager will give me the ability to size/move/close/etc
> > windows, but without the ability to start other programs, etc. I want a
> > kiosk style setu
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 11:41:35AM -0600, Kent West wrote:
> Which window manager will give me the ability to size/move/close/etc
> windows, but without the ability to start other programs, etc. I want a
> kiosk style setup, on a low-memory machine. ICEWM has that menu at the
> bottom with the "
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Kent West wrote:
> Which window manager will give me the ability to size/move/close/etc
> windows, but without the ability to start other programs, etc. I want a
> kiosk style setup, on a low-memory machine. ICEWM has that menu at the
> bottom with the "Start" menu, so it's
on Tue, Mar 19, 2002, Kent West ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Which window manager will give me the ability to size/move/close/etc
> windows, but without the ability to start other programs, etc. I want a
> kiosk style setup, on a low-memory machine.
> ICEWM has that menu at the bottom with the
On 19-Mar-2002 Kent West wrote:
> Which window manager will give me the ability to size/move/close/etc
> windows, but without the ability to start other programs, etc. I want a
> kiosk style setup, on a low-memory machine. ICEWM has that menu at the
> bottom with the "Start" menu, so it's unsui
> "Kent" == Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kent> Any suggestions?
sawfish. it's small, doesn't have a "start menu" type thing, and I
think will place windows for you.
it does pop up a menu when a certain key is pressed ("mouse-2"??) on
the root window, which could allow for the laun
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 11:41:35AM -0600, Kent West wrote:
> Which window manager will give me the ability to size/move/close/etc
> windows, but without the ability to start other programs, etc. I want a
> kiosk style setup, on a low-memory machine. ICEWM has that menu at the
> bottom with the "
Hi people,
I use fvwm... And I've heard of Sawfish, that I've read is very fast.
But,
which one is faster, fvwm or Sawfish? (with a ISA-16 bit video card with
the config file totally hacked I still need more speed, victim of
capitalism I am!)
Thank you.
Ignasi
Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/07/2000 (15:57) :
> Actually the latest Enlightenment (using the default configuration) uses
> about the same amount of resources as Window Maker.
Maybe but I find that very hard to believe.
My current WindowMaker leaves this print:
VSZ = 3432
RSS = 1248
-
No, he means Sawfish. For you and the previous poster - Sawmill was
renamed to Sawfish due to some issues regarding the use of the name
Sawmill. It's all documented on the home page.
Cheers,
Corey Popelier
http://members.dingoblue.net.au/~pancreas
Work Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 3 Jul 20
> -Original Message-
> From: Pollywog [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 03 July 2000 15:04
> To: debian-user list
> Subject: Re: Which window manager
>
>
>
> On 03-Jul-2000 13:53:54 Sean wrote:
> > Actually the latest Enlightenment (using the default
fvwm2 has always been my favorite. It takes signigicantly less time to load
than Gnome and I have nerver seen any lag in performance because of it.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Dinesh Nadarajah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 5:37 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.or
hi there ...
my box is rather "old" (P 200, 64 Megs RAM) and I tried both WindowMaker
and Enlightenment and compared to WindowMaker Enlightenment is SLOW ...
(the same with Gnome)
On Mon, 03 Jul 2000 09:53:54 -0400, Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Actually the latest Enlightenment (usin
What is this "Sawfish". I have seen SAwmill but not
sawfish.
-D
--- Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually the latest Enlightenment (using the default
> configuration) uses
> about the same amount of resources as Window Maker.
>
> Personally I'd reccomend Sawfish as well though.
>
> Sean
>
On 03-Jul-2000 13:53:54 Sean wrote:
> Actually the latest Enlightenment (using the default configuration)
> uses
> about the same amount of resources as Window Maker.
>
> Personally I'd reccomend Sawfish as well though.
You mean "Sawmill"?
--
Andrew
Actually the latest Enlightenment (using the default configuration) uses
about the same amount of resources as Window Maker.
Personally I'd reccomend Sawfish as well though.
Sean
Preben Randhol wrote:
>
> Dinesh Nadarajah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 30/06/2000 (23:37) :
> > I am looking for a
Dinesh Nadarajah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 30/06/2000 (23:37) :
> I am looking for a window manager for debian that will
> not soakup the system resources. Which one would you
> suggest?
First keep well away from Enlightenment. It uses a lot of resources on
absolutely nothing (e.i eye-candy).
Dinesh Nadarajah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am looking for a window manager for debian that will
> not soakup the system resources. Which one would you
> suggest?
>
> Thanks.
>
> -D
My favourite combo is sawfish (CoolClean Theme) with tkdesk (Be'ish
style) instead of gnome-panel. Sawfish i
> I am looking for a window manager for debian that will
> not soakup the system resources. Which one would you
> suggest?
I remain fond of asclassic---small, light, simple, good-looking and
very configurable. It's an old version of Afterstep, maintained for
those who like the basic features of A
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I like mwm in lesstif, the libraries from which are
>required for nedit, my favorite editor. However,
>the lesstif package containing mwm doesn't seem
>to "Provides: window-manager", dselect nagged me
>to install one of the Recommended window managers.
Bolan Meek wrote:
>
> Dinesh Nadarajah wrote:
> >
> > I am looking for a window manager for debian that will
> > not soakup the system resources. Which one would you
> > suggest?
>
> I like mwm in lesstif, the libraries from which are
> required for nedit, my favorite editor. However,
> the less
...icewm (with liquid for a theme). it's clean and
doesn't remind me of m$. (be sure to apt-get iceconf
so you can hide the taskbar and use cool background
images.)
hth.
bentley taylor
//
Dinesh Nadarajah wrote:
>
> I am looking for a window manager for debian that will
> not soakup the syst
Dinesh Nadarajah wrote:
>
> I am looking for a window manager for debian that will
> not soakup the system resources. Which one would you
> suggest?
I like mwm in lesstif, the libraries from which are
required for nedit, my favorite editor. However,
the lesstif package containing mwm doesn't see
icewm (ice window manager) is another good one - very simple and easy on
resources.
Tom
Dinesh Nadarajah wrote:
>
> I am looking for a window manager for debian that will
> not soakup the system resources. Which one would you
> suggest?
>
> Thanks.
>
> -D
> From: Dinesh Nadarajah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I am looking for a window manager for debian that will
> not soakup the system resources. Which one would you
> suggest?
If you're going to run Gnome, I'd suggest using Helix-Gnome (on Woody) and
the version of Sawfish that comes with it. Sawf
On 30-Jun-2000 Dinesh Nadarajah wrote:
> I am looking for a window manager for debian that will
> not soakup the system resources. Which one would you
> suggest?
>
I maintain blackbox it was designed to be minimal. Another popular choice is
window maker, with all the bells and whistles turned o
I've grown fond of scwm. Like sawmill, it's an extremely configurable
window manager, using guile (instead of sawmill's elisp-ish language)
as an extension/customization language.
--Miguel
Martin Fluch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> On Tue, 30 Nov 1999,
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> hi guys,
>
> As of right now, I am currenlty running fvwm, and I want to know if I
> should stick with this window manager or install a different. And if
> so, what do you guys recommend? Keep in mind that I am running Debian
> on a slo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Tam Than Ma wrote:
> As of right now, I am currenlty running fvwm, and I want to know if I should
> stick with this window manager or install a different. And if so, what do
> you guys recommend? Keep in mind that I am running Debian on a sl
43 matches
Mail list logo
