TP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org; debian-security@lists.debian.org
> Subject:Re: PPPoverEthernet vs. PPPoverATM
>
> Hello,
>
> The
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 04:47:02PM +0100, VERBEEK, Francois wrote:
| Note that PPPoE is anyway encapsulated in ATM so you eventually get an
| additional (and useless) overhead.
Possibly. I expect, but have no facts or proof, that a "dsl modem"
will strip out the ethernet frames and use only the p
Subject: Re: PPPoverEthernet vs. PPPoverATM
Hello,
The adsl protocol is based on ATM anyhow. ATM cells leave the CPE (the
thing which
have the phone line in) to reach the local DSLAM which aggregare
multiple client
and then goes in a WAN which may be quit
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 08:56:55AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm about to turn to ADSL connection to Internet and I'm taking in
> consideration
> all the choises the Provider offer. I was surprised in seening they offer
> an ADSL service not only using the PPP-over-Eth protocol, but also w
Hello,
The adsl protocol is based on ATM anyhow. ATM cells leave the CPE (the thing
which
have the phone line in) to reach the local DSLAM which aggregare multiple client
and then goes in a WAN which may be quite a lot of things. The question to know
if you have to run pppoe or pppoatm is to know
In my opinion You will have a nat support the cisco router give tou a
standart TCP/IP adresse on an ethernet netwrk.
Debian computer will not use PPP over ATM, it is th router who will do
that.
But I'm not sure.
On Thursday, February 21, 2002, at 08:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm about
6 matches
Mail list logo
