On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:33:12 -0500
"Seth Goodman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My point was that this law, sadly, establishes the principle that
> spamming is legal, as long as you abide by the rules. There is no
In a way, yes. But it also can be viewed as "these types of spam are
wrong". Drin
On Thursday, September 28, 2006 10:48 PM -0500, David E. Fox wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:47:39 -0500
> "Seth Goodman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Spamming activities that are now illegal in the U.S.: sending
> > UBE to electronically harvested addresses, forging headers,
> > deceptive
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:47:39 -0500
"Seth Goodman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Spamming activities that are now illegal in the U.S.: sending UBE to
> electronically harvested addresses, forging headers, deceptive subject
99% of the spam (at least) violates one or more of those restrictions.
>
On Wednesday, September 27, 2006 3:33 AM -0500, Johannes Wiedersich
wrote:
> Sending spam is illegal in many countries including
> the EU and the US, so the people responsible for servers in these
> countries are legally obliged to take action, if they are notified.
That's not true for the U.S.
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 18:32, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Mumia W.. wrote:
> > Is it a good idea to report spam to the mailing list to the respective
> > ISPs? The spam was not sent to me personally; however, it *is* spam; it
> > made it into my mailbox, and the mail-list debian-user didn'
Mumia W.. wrote:
Is it a good idea to report spam to the mailing list to the respective
ISPs? The spam was not sent to me personally; however, it *is* spam; it
made it into my mailbox, and the mail-list debian-user didn't "opt-in." ;-)
Should I attempt to report things like this?
Probably, y
On 09/26/2006 01:29 PM, CHEAP OFFER wrote:
MOBILE PHONES AT VERY LOW PRICE OFFER.
PRICE LIST.
Nokia N93...$310 USD
Nokia 8800..$200 USD
[...]
Is it a good idea to report spam to the mailing list to the respective
ISPs? The spam was not sent t
7 matches
Mail list logo
