-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> Why is this? It would seem that unix_chkpwd would be able to do this,
> and afaik, pam_unix uses it automatically. At least, it did on RHL.
unix_chkpwd only authenticates the calling uid.
Phil Brutsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But exim *must* run as root to be able to authenticate using the system
> passwords in /etc/shadow. I know of no way around it, except for making
> /etc/shadow world readable, which is even more dangerous than having exim
> run as root.
Why is this? I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> But isn't that a bad thing(tm) ?
It can be.
> Surely you must be able to get a simple yes no on auth out of PAM with
> it rather doing things as root?
Sure, PAM works fine without exim ru
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 5:00 PM
To: Eugene van Zyl
Cc: GLUG; Debian-User
Subject: Re: Exim PAM SMTP Authentication, help!
*** PGP Signature Status: unknown
*** Signer: Unknown, Key ID = 0x50DE1CFC
*** Signed: 2001/04/10 06:59:52
*** Verified: 2001/04/10 06:39:16
*** BEGIN PG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying Exim to authenticate users for mail relay using the SMTP
> AUTH interface. I've recompiled the Debian Exim 3.12-10 source package
> with the standard/default settings and
5 matches
Mail list logo