Re: ClamAV on Sarge

2005-10-14 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi Matthew, On Thursday, 13 Oct 2005, you wrote: > "contains packages like ClamAV" .. under i386 I only see ClamAV. There > are no other packages that are considered volatile? we have also jwhois in volatile, a second whois client is pending. Also Jesus Climent offered to help us with Spamassass

RE: ClamAV on Sarge

2005-10-13 Thread Timothy Spear
al Message- From: Matthew Lenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 10:15 AM To: Timothy Spear Cc: 'John Oxley'; debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: RE: ClamAV on Sarge "contains packages like ClamAV" .. under i386 I only see ClamAV. There are no othe

RE: ClamAV on Sarge

2005-10-13 Thread Matthew Lenz
"contains packages like ClamAV" .. under i386 I only see ClamAV. There are no other packages that are considered volatile? On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 09:29 -0400, Timothy Spear wrote: > The answer for ClamAV is to use Volatile. This partial distribution set > contains packages like ClamAV which are no

RE: ClamAV on Sarge

2005-10-13 Thread Timothy Spear
The answer for ClamAV is to use Volatile. This partial distribution set contains packages like ClamAV which are non-static and need to be updated on a continual basis; even in a stable release. I am running 0.87 from Volatile on my 3.1 systems. Tim -Original Message- From: John Oxley [ma

Re: ClamAV on Sarge

2005-10-13 Thread John Oxley
Sorry for replying to my own post. On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 03:06:21PM +0200, John Oxley wrote: > [snip] > Now here is my question. Is there some reliable source for keeping up > with the latest clam version, or will I have to compile it myself? If I > do compile it myself and build a debian pack