On Wed, Dec 03, 1997 at 10:42:44AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> One other thing that a university lecturer of mine loves to point out;
> FreeBSD is BSD, so it has the stability and standardness of BSD,
> including standard C API etc. Standard BSD networking. Some BSD
> folks are very fond of s
On Tue, Dec 02, 1997 at 09:58:41AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Randy Edwards writes:
> > I was wondering what sort of arguments folks would give for selecting
> > Linux over FreeBSD. This is for a production server in an educational
> > environment. The arguments used against Linux were tha
Lets put it like this.
I tried installing FreeBSD, but gave up because the install routine was buggy
and plainly didn't work at points (this was to allow installs over a PPP link).
Debian had a straight-forward FAQ with "d/l this, this and this. If you have
one of these then you will need this"
On Tue, 2 Dec 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Also, FreeBSD is not commercial software, Red Hat Linux is commercial
> software! (along with all the goodies which come with a commercial product,
> like tech support!)
Actually, Red Hat's tech support is only for installation problems, and
from the
Randy Edwards writes:
>
> I was wondering what sort of arguments folks would give for selecting
> Linux over FreeBSD. This is for a production server in an educational
> environment. The arguments used against Linux were that it was buggy
> and goes through too many changes. I, of course, count
5 matches
Mail list logo
