On 2004-11-29 05:08:19 -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
> Arch is especially nice because you don't need a server process
> anywhere, like Subversion does, but it supports changesets, like
> Subversion does.
Subversion doesn't need a server process (unless you want a server):
The svn client can access fi
Colin wrote:
I'm surprised that no one mentioned Subversion yet.
It has been mentioned several times
Regards,
Benedict
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm surprised that no one mentioned Subversion yet.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 12:52:25PM -0500, Allan Wind wrote:
> Not sure about that, actually, but integration with my favorite editor
> (vim) would be nice.
CVS, Subversion, and the venerable RCS/SCCS itelf all have available vim
integration tools. I don't know if Arch does... I haven't been able
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:28:17 +0100, Richard Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which is the best RCS ? I'm a little lost between CVS, SCCS, Arch,
> Subversion ...
>
> Thanks for your experiences
Set aside some time to test them all. It isn't easy to test them, you
have to try a number of thing whi
On 2004-11-29T17:53:07+0100, Mateusz Åoskot wrote:
> Sorry, I can't help you. Looking on your toughts about all those
> RCSs I can say you have a big problem to find the one ;-)
One requirement for me to open ended support for files other than line
based text files. It should support merging of x
Allan Wind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [...]
> cvs is the most gorilla of the 3 and it shows especially when it comes
> to audit and monitoring (syntax for branching and mergeing seemed
> unnatural to me).
>
> [...]
>
> I cannot for the life of me get used to the odly named file names or
> namespace in
I just evaluated prcs, cvs and monotone for a paper, representing
somewhat the single-user scenario, client-server and peer-to-peer.
prcs can be used in a client-server setting too, but requires you to
share disks, but has otherwise a really clean interface Not widely
used, as far as I know.
cvs
User Richard Kemp wrote::
Which is the best RCS ? I'm a little lost between CVS, SCCS, Arch,
Subversion ...
Thanks for your experiences
My favourites (in order):
- subversion
- darcs
- cvs
Here is a very nice comparsion which should help you to make a decision.
Greets
--
Mateusz Łoskot, mateusz (
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 01:28:17PM +0100, Richard Kemp wrote:
> Which is the best RCS ? I'm a little lost between CVS, SCCS, Arch,
> Subversion ...
I don't know about "best", but so far I like arch, although it is a little
bit "opaque" regarding usage.
Arch is especially nice because you don't n
> Richard Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-29 13:28]:
>
> Which is the best RCS ? I'm a little lost between CVS, SCCS, Arch,
> Subversion ...
>
This depends on your requirements. I know CVS, arch and Subversion.
CVS I would not recommend anymore.
arch is really cool -- but not too easy.
Subvers
Which is the best RCS ? I'm a little lost between CVS, SCCS, Arch,
Subversion ...
Thanks for your experiences
--
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12 matches
Mail list logo
