Re: RCS/CVS for /etc

2001-11-13 Thread martin f krafft
* xio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.11.12 11:47:00+]: > 2. CVS is more difficult to setup and does not work out of the box for > /etc. > > a. you have to first import the whole /etc tree to cvs > b. symbolic links will be ignored. > c. automated changes will be de

Re: RCS/CVS for /etc

2001-11-13 Thread xio
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 06:55:58PM +0100, Andras BALI wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 11:47:00AM +, xio wrote: > > > I have been playing around first with RCS and then CVS for /etc. > > Maybe you could check out `changetrack' before trying to implement it > on your own. I use it for all my i

Re: RCS/CVS for /etc

2001-11-12 Thread Andras BALI
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 11:47:00AM +, xio wrote: > I have been playing around first with RCS and then CVS for /etc. Maybe you could check out `changetrack' before trying to implement it on your own. I use it for all my important config files and it's really great. Regards, -- BALI, Andra's

RCS/CVS for /etc

2001-11-12 Thread xio
Dear debian-users, I have been playing around first with RCS and then CVS for /etc. I am interested in comments on some things I have observed, and maybe some answers to some of my questions: 1. RCS is easy to setup up and work out of the box for /etc. The only limitations I could find are