--- On Wed, 1/27/10, Johannes Wiedersich
wrote:
From: Johannes Wiedersich
Subject: Re: selected debian questions: raid & performance tips
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Wednesday, January 27, 2010, 11:59 PM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dino Vliet w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dino Vliet wrote:
> Questions
>
> 1) Can you show me the definitive debian lenny guide to create a
> software RAID-1 array from within the debian installer (I searched
> with google but wasn't that sucessfull and the manual is brief) The
> OS and data
Dear debian people,
I need to configure a application/database server to proof the potential of
open source business intelligence. I want to use a ETL tool like the java based
Talend or Pentaho Kettle or maybe the unix tools awk, sed, perl to transform 25
million records into 10 million recor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have 4 disks for a software raid configuration.
> I'm pondering about using either a 4 disk raid5 array, or
> a 4 disk raid10 array.
>
> I'm interested in speed mostly, but data integrity is important too.
> I'm running a web, proxy, file, email server all in one. (Sar
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:24:49PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have 4 disks for a software raid configuration.
> I'm pondering about using either a 4 disk raid5 array, or
> a 4 disk raid10 array.
>
> I'm interested in speed mostly, but data integrity is important too.
> I'm running a web,
I have 4 disks for a software raid configuration.
I'm pondering about using either a 4 disk raid5 array, or
a 4 disk raid10 array.
I'm interested in speed mostly, but data integrity is important too.
I'm running a web, proxy, file, email server all in one. (Sarge box)
I suppose with Raid5, I wou
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> As for filesystems, I personally prefer ReiserFS, but that's just
>> personal preference. If you're comfortable with ext3, then by all
>> means use ext3.
>
>ditto, reiserfs is a better choice than ext3
>
> see the reiser
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 10:30:13AM +0100, Pete Clarke wrote:
> >
> > I will be installing 4 120gb EIDE ATA133 drives, would I get better
> > performance by mounting each one individually, or by RAID0ing them?
run some tests ??
date
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 10:30:13AM +0100, Pete Clarke wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am about to upgrade my file server, and have a question for you good
> people :-)
>
> I will be installing 4 120gb EIDE ATA133 drives, would I get better
> performance by mounting each one individually, or by RAID0ing
Hi there,
I am about to upgrade my file server, and have a question for you good
people :-)
I will be installing 4 120gb EIDE ATA133 drives, would I get better
performance by mounting each one individually, or by RAID0ing them?
Backup is taken care of, so redundancy is not a problem, also I will
10 matches
Mail list logo
