Thanks.
Thats also what the maintainer of dpkg answered me to my bug report.
On 23/12/18 6:49 μ.μ., Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Le 22/12/2018 à 02:44, aprekates a écrit :
Indeed some are virtual or pure virtual (although i dont know the diff)
But also there are packages like 'ergo' which look nor
Le 22/12/2018 à 02:44, aprekates a écrit :
Indeed some are virtual or pure virtual (although i dont know the diff)
But also there are packages like 'ergo' which look normal
and the only relation i think found (reason to display it) is because
libstd++6 depends on it.
Also listed packages like '
Yes, i noticed that w* will pass if there is no such file in
current dir.
But still i cant understand the output so i submit
bugreport Bug#917098:
Thanks all for the feedback.
On 22/12/18 6:13 μ.μ., Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
Dan Ritter writes:
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
On 21 de dezembro de 2
Dan Ritter writes:
> Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
>> On 21 de dezembro de 2018 20:24, aprekates wrote:
>> > In a new installed system with Debian 9.6
>> >
>> > $ dpkg -l
>> >
>> > will list only packages with 'ii' state and a couple of 'rc'.
>> >
>> > But if i run:
>> >
>> > $ dpkg -l w*
>>
Indeed some are virtual or pure virtual (although i dont know the diff)
But also there are packages like 'ergo' which look normal
and the only relation i think found (reason to display it) is because
libstd++6 depends on it.
Also listed packages like 'wink' not in the repos any more.
On 22/12/
On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 01:10:34 +0200
aprekates wrote:
> In my case both:
>
> $ dpkg -l w*
>
> and
>
> $ dpkg -l 'w*'
>
> will report the same list
>
Hi!
I'm getting the same sort of output and it seems to me these are
packages, dpkg knows about providing some virtual packages,
that something
In my case both:
$ dpkg -l w*
and
$ dpkg -l 'w*'
will report the same list
# dpkg -l w*
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|
Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> On 21 de dezembro de 2018 20:24, aprekates wrote:
> > In a new installed system with Debian 9.6
> >
> > $ dpkg -l
> >
> > will list only packages with 'ii' state and a couple of 'rc'.
> >
> > But if i run:
> >
> > $ dpkg -l w*
> >
> > i will get a dozen also of
On 21 de dezembro de 2018 20:24, aprekates wrote:
> In a new installed system with Debian 9.6
>
> $ dpkg -l
>
> will list only packages with 'ii' state and a couple of 'rc'.
>
> But if i run:
>
> $ dpkg -l w*
>
> i will get a dozen also of 'un' packages.
>
> So i dont understand the logic of
In a new installed system with Debian 9.6
$ dpkg -l
will list only packages with 'ii' state and a couple of 'rc'.
But if i run:
$ dpkg -l w*
i will get a dozen also of 'un' packages.
So i dont understand the logic of altering the output when
i use a pattern . I would expect to see only 'ii'
10 matches
Mail list logo
