[SOLVED] Re: Question for users of Thunderbird on buster

2020-06-22 Thread D. R. Evans
Virgo Pärna wrote on 6/16/20 6:27 AM: > > Nothing to do with keyboard layouts. Some fonts have ligatures, > that combine two different characters into one symbol. I actually tried > it on Windows with Thunderbird and "Cascadia Mono" font. Rendering > engine in Thunderbird probably has ligat

Re: Question for users of Thunderbird on buster

2020-06-22 Thread The Wanderer
On 2020-06-11 at 03:27, Virgo Pärna wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 14:10:45 -0600, D. R. Evans wrote: > >> For example: >> if I type the "-" character twice in a row, Thunderbird displays only one, >> even though both characters are present in the text >> if I type the "<" character twice in a

Re: Question for users of Thunderbird on buster

2020-06-22 Thread D. R. Evans
Virgo Pärna wrote on 6/16/20 6:34 AM: > On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 13:12:25 -0600, D. R. Evans wrote: >> >> I'll have to dig in and see if there's a way to turn it off. I'll look at the >> details of the font as well; I'm not at all sure what exactly is telling TB >> "if you see two consecutive "less-tha

Re: Question for users of Thunderbird on buster

2020-06-16 Thread Virgo Pärna
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 13:12:25 -0600, D. R. Evans wrote: > > I'll have to dig in and see if there's a way to turn it off. I'll look at the > details of the font as well; I'm not at all sure what exactly is telling TB > "if you see two consecutive "less-than" signs, then render them as a single > "mu

Re: Question for users of Thunderbird on buster

2020-06-16 Thread Virgo Pärna
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 07:07:01 + (UTC), davidson wrote: > > Different requirements call for different keyboard layouts. It sounds > like in Thunderbird, for whatever reason, you have one enabled that > doesn't fit yours. > Nothing to do with keyboard layouts. Some fonts have ligatures

Re: Question for users of Thunderbird on buster

2020-06-16 Thread davidson
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020, D. R. Evans wrote: Virgo Pärna wrote on 6/11/20 1:27 AM: On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 14:10:45 -0600, D. R. Evans wrote: For example: if I type the "-" character twice in a row, Thunderbird displays only one, even though both characters are present in the text Speculation in t

Re: Question for users of Thunderbird on buster

2020-06-11 Thread D. R. Evans
Virgo Pärna wrote on 6/11/20 1:27 AM: > On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 14:10:45 -0600, D. R. Evans wrote: >> For example: >> if I type the "-" character twice in a row, Thunderbird displays only one, >> even though both characters are present in the text >> if I type the "<" character twice in a row, Thu

Re: Question for users of Thunderbird on buster

2020-06-11 Thread Virgo Pärna
On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 14:10:45 -0600, D. R. Evans wrote: > For example: > if I type the "-" character twice in a row, Thunderbird displays only one, > even though both characters are present in the text > if I type the "<" character twice in a row, Thunderbird converts the two > "less than" char

Re: Question for users of Thunderbird on buster

2020-06-10 Thread l0f4r0
Hi, 11 juin 2020 à 02:56 de f...@blakemfg.com: > On 6/10/20 1:10 PM, D. R. Evans wrote: > >> As far as I can tell, no one else using other OSes seems to be having this >> problem, so maybe it's a Thunderbird-on-buster issue that needs to be >> reported >> somewhere. Or maybe it's just my system

Re: Question for users of Thunderbird on buster

2020-06-10 Thread Fred
On 6/10/20 1:10 PM, D. R. Evans wrote: As far as I can tell, no one else using other OSes seems to be having this problem, so maybe it's a Thunderbird-on-buster issue that needs to be reported somewhere. Or maybe it's just my system for some obscure reason So, with current buster, the installed

Question for users of Thunderbird on buster

2020-06-10 Thread D. R. Evans
As far as I can tell, no one else using other OSes seems to be having this problem, so maybe it's a Thunderbird-on-buster issue that needs to be reported somewhere. Or maybe it's just my system for some obscure reason So, with current buster, the installed version of Thunderbird is 68.8.0. I have