Re: Question about command-line aptitude 0.2.11.1

2003-06-12 Thread Joey Hess
Ron Johnson wrote: > > > The following packages are unused and will be REMOVED: > > > bluefish gaim gedit gnome-spell libgtkspell0 logjam pan > > However, one thing puzzles me: bluefish, gaim, gedit, logjam & pan > are "terminal" packages. I.e., nothing depends on them. > > What happened is th

Re: Question about command-line aptitude 0.2.11.1

2003-06-12 Thread iain d broadfoot
* Ron Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Thanks. > > However, one thing puzzles me: bluefish, gaim, gedit, logjam & pan > are "terminal" packages. I.e., nothing depends on them. > > What happened is that they depend on gnome-spell, so when I > removed it, these other packages were also removed

Re: Question about command-line aptitude 0.2.11.1

2003-06-12 Thread Ron Johnson
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 20:36, Joey Hess wrote: > Ron Johnson wrote: > > This is on a mixed sarge/sid system. > > > > ~# aptitude install base-config > > Reading Package Lists... Done > > Building Dependency Tree > > Reading extended state information... Done > > The following packages are unused an

Re: Question about command-line aptitude 0.2.11.1

2003-06-12 Thread Joey Hess
Ron Johnson wrote: > This is on a mixed sarge/sid system. > > ~# aptitude install base-config > Reading Package Lists... Done > Building Dependency Tree > Reading extended state information... Done > The following packages are unused and will be REMOVED: > bluefish gaim gedit gnome-spell libgtks

Question about command-line aptitude 0.2.11.1

2003-06-11 Thread Ron Johnson
Hi, This is on a mixed sarge/sid system. ~# aptitude install base-config Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree Reading extended state information... Done The following packages are unused and will be REMOVED: bluefish gaim gedit gnome-spell libgtkspell0 logjam pan [snip] The fo