Joseph Loo wrote:
> B wrote:
> > Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> > ...
> ...
>
> I think you are missing the problem associated with SSd. The wear problem is
> associated with the amount of free space. If the drive is 99.99% full, you
> could probably wear the drive out in no time at all. The wear pr
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 19:21:41 -0700
Joseph Loo wrote:
> I think you are missing the problem associated with SSd. The wear
> problem is associated with the amount of free space. If the drive
> is 99.99% full, you could probably wear the drive out in no time
> at all. The wear problem is prevented
On 06/23/2014 12:27 PM, B wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 04:34:00 +1000
Andrew McGlashan wrote:
I believe that would be true of quite /old/ SSD drives, but
definitely not for newer ones.
I wouldn't be so positive… until a real independent lab,
conducting real tests (especially with a high nu
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:59:04 -0400
Steve Litt wrote:
> 3 years later I bought an IBM Deskstar drive with 6 times the
> capacity for $300.00 :-)
These aren't even SATA but IDE; but they're on old machines
that give satisfaction for what they're used: storing CAD
drawings updated very often and a
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 20:05:07 +0100
Brian wrote:
> On Mon 23 Jun 2014 at 12:43:19 -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
>
> > Anyway, things are going well. My other observation is that Debian
> > is less like Ubuntu than it initially looks.
>
> Debian looks less like Ubuntu than you originally thought? What
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 21:27:59 +0200
B wrote:
> May be, but most of my disks have a ≥ 10 years life (24/7) with
> a very few errors (only 2 of 45 have 1 & 3 unrecoverable sectors),
> so, if you can prove me SSD is as good as these, why not…
My question is this: Would a ten year old disk be wor
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 04:34:00 +1000
Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> I believe that would be true of quite /old/ SSD drives, but
> definitely not for newer ones.
I wouldn't be so positive… until a real independent lab,
conducting real tests (especially with a high number of
small files, test curiously
On Mon 23 Jun 2014 at 12:43:19 -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> Anyway, things are going well. My other observation is that Debian is
> less like Ubuntu than it initially looks.
Debian looks less like Ubuntu than you originally thought? What did you
expect and why should it matter? - they are two diffe
Steve Litt wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 04:34:00 +1000
> Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>> There have been very heavy torture tests on thew newer range of SSDs
>> and they are performing exceptionally well with mega data being
>> written [1], up to fairly heavy data usage levels.
>> [1]
>> http://www.
btw It looks like exim4 first entered into Debian with Sarge (Debian
3.1, released 2005), here's a link with more info:
http://www.debian-administration.org/article/98/Upgrading_from_Woody_to_Sarge_Part_4_-_Apache2
Cheers
A.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
Steve,
This page was last modified in 2006 and it too talks about "latest Debian"
curl -I http://blog.edseek.com/~jasonb/articles/exim4_courier/exim4.html
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 18:54:55 GMT
Server: Apache/2.2.16 (Debian)
Last-Modified: Fri, 19 May 2006 19:30:55 GMT
ETag: "11c128-
Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> On 24/06/2014 3:16 AM, B wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:43:19 -0400
>> Steve Litt wrote:
>>> I've got the hardware all set up. AMD dual core 4100, 16GB RAM,
>>> 240GB SSD for /, 750GB Western Digital Black for /var, /tmp, /run,
>>> and swap partition,
>>
>> As a
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 04:34:00 +1000
Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> On 24/06/2014 3:16 AM, B wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:43:19 -0400
> > Steve Litt wrote:
> >
> >> I've got the hardware all set up. AMD dual core 4100, 16GB RAM,
> >> 240GB SSD for /, 750GB Western Digital Black for /var, /tmp
B wrote:>
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:43:19 -0400
> Steve Litt wrote:
>> I've got the hardware all set up. AMD dual core 4100, 16GB RAM, 240GB
>> SSD for /, 750GB Western Digital Black for /var, /tmp, /run, and swap
>> partition,
> As a SSD has limited write capacities, people usually avoid
What are you talking about Steve?
On 24/06/2014 2:43 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
> The biggest problem I'm having right now is email. I set up a
> preliminary Dovecot on the Debian machine. For some reason, the only
> way to get the dovecot executable on Wheezy is to follow these
> instructions on addin
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 18:33:27 + (UTC)
Curt wrote:
> On 2014-06-23, Tom Furie wrote:
> >
> > Try again. The "often (re)written" directories are on a WD spinning
> > disk. His data (not sure if that includes homes, but if not I would
> > strongly advise it) is on yet another spinning disk.
> >
On 2014-06-23, Tom Furie wrote:
>
> Try again. The "often (re)written" directories are on a WD spinning
> disk. His data (not sure if that includes homes, but if not I would
> strongly advise it) is on yet another spinning disk.
>
Right, but as his data appears to be on a WD "Green" maybe Steve s
On 24/06/2014 3:16 AM, B wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:43:19 -0400
> Steve Litt wrote:
>
>> I've got the hardware all set up. AMD dual core 4100, 16GB RAM,
>> 240GB SSD for /, 750GB Western Digital Black for /var, /tmp, /run,
>> and swap partition,
>
> As a SSD has limited write capacities
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 18:26:48 +0100
Tom Furie wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 07:16:27PM +0200, B wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:43:19 -0400
> > Steve Litt wrote:
> >
> > > I've got the hardware all set up. AMD dual core 4100, 16GB RAM,
> > > 240GB SSD for /, 750GB Western Digital Black
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 18:26:48 +0100
Tom Furie wrote:
> Try again. The "often (re)written" directories are on a WD spinning
> disk. His data (not sure if that includes homes, but if not I would
> strongly advise it) is on yet another spinning disk.
Oops, I missed the comma :(
Manufacturers (or re
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 07:16:27PM +0200, B wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:43:19 -0400
> Steve Litt wrote:
>
> > I've got the hardware all set up. AMD dual core 4100, 16GB RAM,
> > 240GB SSD for /, 750GB Western Digital Black for /var, /tmp, /run,
> > and swap partition,
>
> As a SSD has li
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:43:19 -0400
Steve Litt wrote:
> I've got the hardware all set up. AMD dual core 4100, 16GB RAM,
> 240GB SSD for /, 750GB Western Digital Black for /var, /tmp, /run,
> and swap partition,
As a SSD has limited write capacities, people usually avoid
using it for things that
On Monday 23 June 2014 17:43:19 Steve Litt wrote:
> My other observation is that Debian is
> less like Ubuntu than it initially looks.
:-)) Quite!! But I don't actually even think that it initially looks like
it
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Hi all,
I've got the hardware all set up. AMD dual core 4100, 16GB RAM, 240GB
SSD for /, 750GB Western Digital Black for /var, /tmp, /run, and swap
partition, and a 3GB Western Digital Green for all my data.
I installed Debian Wheezy 7.5 network install with "nonfree yes", and
xxxterm (soon to be
24 matches
Mail list logo
