Am Sonntag, 17. November 2013, 16:57:30 schrieb Brad Rogers:
> On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 15:47:40 +
> Alex Naysmith wrote:
>
> Hello Alex,
>
> >#aptitude purge nvidia-kernel-dkms nvidia-glx
> >
> >The nvidia driver is still present and functioning. During the [failed]
> >purge, I received the mess
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 15:47:40 +
Alex Naysmith wrote:
Hello Alex,
>#aptitude purge nvidia-kernel-dkms nvidia-glx
>
>The nvidia driver is still present and functioning. During the [failed]
>purge, I received the message 'No packages will be installed, upgraded,
>or removed'.
nvidia-glx is a tr
After purging the nvidia drivers with the following command:
#aptitude purge nvidia-kernel-dkms nvidia-glx
The nvidia driver is still present and functioning. During the [failed]
purge, I received the message 'No packages will be installed, upgraded, or
removed'.
On 10 November 2013 21:44,
On Jo, 14 nov 13, 18:52:25, Kailash Kalyani wrote:
>
> I've used the sgfxi script and it supports removing non-free drivers
> and installing free ones instead.
>
> http://smxi.org/site/about.htm#sgfxi
> What is sgfxi (simple graphics installer - s gfx i)
>
> The primary purpose of sgfxi is to in
On Monday 11 November 2013 11:11 PM, Curt wrote:
On 2013-11-11, Chris Bannister wrote:
Will the nouveau driver be "unblacklisted" after the purge?
Ask yourself - "Would you, as system administrator, expect this?" then
Oh, sorry, I thought you were answering the OP, a newbie who asked for
On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 21:17 +, Alex Naysmith wrote:
> Thank you all for the sed regex explanation. What possible kernel
> variations other than 'generic' are possible to require the sed
> substitution?
I guess there isn't a kernel named "generic" available by Debian
repositories and the name e
Thank you all for the sed regex explanation. What possible kernel
variations other than 'generic' are possible to require the sed
substitution?
After some googling, I've discovered that I'm actually compiling the nvidia
driver and hence the business with the Linux header.
On 12 November 2013 07:
On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 07:56 +, Alex Naysmith wrote:
> linux-headers-$(uname -r|sed 's,[^-]*-[^-]*-,,')
It does complete the name "linux-headers-".
Run
echo $(uname -r|sed 's,[^-]*-[^-]*-,,')
or
uname -r|sed 's,[^-]*-[^-]*-,,'
to see what it does add. "uname -r" does show the kernel relea
On 11/12/2013 02:56 AM, Alex Naysmith wrote:
> From the nvidia install procedure is the following command:
>
> # aptitude -r install linux-headers-$(uname -r|sed 's,[^-]*-[^-]*-,,')
> nvidia-kernel-legacy-173xx-dkms
>
> I can see the pipe | symbol and the regular expressions but I don't
> really
>From the nvidia install procedure is the following command:
# aptitude -r install linux-headers-$(uname -r|sed 's,[^-]*-[^-]*-,,')
nvidia-kernel-legacy-173xx-dkms
I can see the pipe | symbol and the regular expressions but I don't really
understand what this command is doing.
Alex
On 10 Nove
On 2013-11-11, Chris Bannister wrote:
>> >
>> Will the nouveau driver be "unblacklisted" after the purge?
>
> Ask yourself - "Would you, as system administrator, expect this?" then
Oh, sorry, I thought you were answering the OP, a newbie who asked for
the procedure (even a wiki) involved in going
Le 11/11/2013 18:14, Chris Bannister a écrit :
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 04:50:36PM +, Curt wrote:
>> On 2013-11-11, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>> I suspect that xorg.conf will not be removed, even not when using purge.
>>>
>> Will the nouveau driver be "unblacklisted" after the purge?
> Ask yoursel
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 04:50:36PM +, Curt wrote:
> On 2013-11-11, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >
> > I suspect that xorg.conf will not be removed, even not when using purge.
> >
> Will the nouveau driver be "unblacklisted" after the purge?
Ask yourself - "Would you, as system administrator, expect
On 2013-11-11, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> I suspect that xorg.conf will not be removed, even not when using purge.
>
Will the nouveau driver be "unblacklisted" after the purge?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm
On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 16:20 +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
>
> Le 11.11.2013 16:18, Ralf Mardorf a écrit :
> > On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 15:25 +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Le 10.11.2013 22:44, Alex Naysmith a écrit :
> >> > After following the procedure at
>
Le 11.11.2013 16:18, Ralf Mardorf a écrit :
On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 15:25 +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
wrote:
Le 10.11.2013 22:44, Alex Naysmith a écrit :
> After following the procedure at
> https://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers [1] to install the
> nvidia-glx-legacy-173xx pack
On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 15:25 +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
>
> Le 10.11.2013 22:44, Alex Naysmith a écrit :
> > After following the procedure at
> > https://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers [1] to install the
> > nvidia-glx-legacy-173xx package for my GeForce FX5550 card [Debian
Le 10.11.2013 22:44, Alex Naysmith a écrit :
After following the procedure at
https://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers [1] to install the
nvidia-glx-legacy-173xx package for my GeForce FX5550 card [Debian 7
"Wheezy"], I would like to know the best method to return to the
nouveau driver wit
After following the procedure at
https://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers to install the
nvidia-glx-legacy-173xx package for my GeForce FX5550 card [Debian 7
"Wheezy"], I would like to know the best method to return to the nouveau
driver with the files from the glx-legacy-1733 package removed
19 matches
Mail list logo
