Re: How to change a symlink without breaking anything (problems with g++)

2003-07-02 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 02:24:30PM +0200, Morten Eriksen wrote: > Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The C++ transition has endlessly been debated and beaten to death in > > a variety of public fora... if you don't know about it, you're > > living under a rock [...] > > I have indeed live

Re: How to change a symlink without breaking anything (problems with g++)

2003-07-02 Thread Morten Eriksen
Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The C++ transition has endlessly been debated and beaten to death in > a variety of public fora... if you don't know about it, you're > living under a rock [...] I have indeed lived under a rock, not participating nor reading any of the Debian public fora

Re: How to change a symlink without breaking anything (problems with g++)

2003-07-02 Thread Marc Wilson
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 08:14:34PM +0200, Morten Eriksen wrote: > (In case someone is interested, I'm asking because I just stumbled > over a surprising issue with the g++ packages: doing an > ># apt-get install g++ > > installed g++-3.3 (I was expecting just an upgrade to the previously

Re: How to change a symlink without breaking anything (problems with g++)

2003-07-02 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 06:50:48PM -0400, David Z Maze wrote: > Morten Eriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > What is the correct manner of changing a symlink file belonging to a > > Debian package? Is it sufficient to just rm and re-link, or should I > > use any of the package-handling tools? >

How to change a symlink without breaking anything (problems with g++)

2003-07-01 Thread Morten Eriksen
Hi, this is probably a newbie question, but I didn't see it covered in any of the FAQs or HOW-TOs I found at debian.org/docs/ (and the list search facilities seems quite sloppy, and I had no luck there either): What is the correct manner of changing a symlink file belonging to a Debian package? I

Re: HELP: Problems with G++ : Try ./hello and not hello

1998-08-29 Thread shaul
Try ./hello instead of hello (at the bash promt) > I am having difficulties getting g++ to compile properly. >  > I am just testing it with a simple "hello" program. > > When I type ... >  > g++ -g -Wall -ohello hello.cc >  > The file - hello - is created.  When I type, hello to execute the progra

Re: HELP: Problems with G++

1998-08-28 Thread Michael Beattie
On Thu, 27 Aug 1998, DMDP wrote: > I am having difficulties getting g++ to compile properly. > > I am just testing it with a simple "hello" program. > > When I type ... > > g++ -g -Wall -ohello hello.cc > > The file - hello - is created. When I type, hello to execute the program. > The bash

HELP: Problems with G++

1998-08-28 Thread DMDP
I am having difficulties getting g++ to compile properly.   I am just testing it with a simple "hello" program.   When I type ...   g++ -g -Wall -ohello hello.cc   The file - hello - is created.  When I type, hello to execute the program.  The bash shell tells me there is no such command.  

Re: Problems with g++

1997-06-10 Thread joost witteveen
> On Jun 9, Sebastien Phelep wrote > > gcc is 2.7.2.2-4; libg++ is 2.7.2.1-9 / 2.7.2.5-1 > > > > I guess it's because I've used "unstable" packages, but I'm note sure. > > Does anybody knows what's the problem is ? > > Debian's gcc 2.7.2.2 packages by default use with libc6; for libc6 you need >

Re: Problems with g++

1997-06-09 Thread J.H.M.Dassen
On Jun 9, Sebastien Phelep wrote > gcc is 2.7.2.2-4; libg++ is 2.7.2.1-9 / 2.7.2.5-1 > > I guess it's because I've used "unstable" packages, but I'm note sure. > Does anybody knows what's the problem is ? Debian's gcc 2.7.2.2 packages by default use with libc6; for libc6 you need the "libg++272"

Problems with g++

1997-06-09 Thread Sebastien Phelep
Hello. I'm having problems with g++: when I launch a program I've compiled with it, I have a segmentation fault; I first thought that it was my program that was bad, but even if I make a *very* simple program (a Point class, with a main that just adds a new point and deletes it i