On Wed, Jun 24, 1998 at 07:47:53AM -0500, Ed Cogburn wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 1998 at 11:20:01PM -0700, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> > > The latest packages update includes a2ps_4.10.2-4. When I try to upgrade
> > > from 4.10-4 using dselect, it says that tetex-bin is recomm
On Wed, 24 Jun 1998, Miguel A. Arranz wrote:
> Just one thing. Why is tetex-bin recommended with a2ps? I can't see
> the relationship.
I wondered about that also. From changelog.Debian.gz:
a2ps (4.10.2-3) unstable; urgency=low, Closes=23352
* Added 'Recommends: groff, tetex-bin, psutils' to
Just one thing. Why is tetex-bin recommended with a2ps? I can't see
the relationship.
Greetings
**
Miguel A. Arranz
Dpt. of Economics
Universidad de Alicante
Apdo. Correos 99
E-03080 ALICANTE
SPAIN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
On Wed, 24 Jun 1998, Ed Cogburn wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 1998 at 11:20:01PM -0700, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> > > The latest packages update includes a2ps_4.10.2-4. When I try to upgrade
> > > from 4.10-4 using dselect, it says that tetex-bin is recommended, but
> > > if
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 1998 at 11:20:01PM -0700, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> > The latest packages update includes a2ps_4.10.2-4. When I try to upgrade
> > from 4.10-4 using dselect, it says that tetex-bin is recommended, but
> > if I unselect tetex-bin, the dependency resolution scre
On Tue, Jun 23, 1998 at 11:20:01PM -0700, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> The latest packages update includes a2ps_4.10.2-4. When I try to upgrade
> from 4.10-4 using dselect, it says that tetex-bin is recommended, but
> if I unselect tetex-bin, the dependency resolution screen comes back
> and selects it (a
The latest packages update includes a2ps_4.10.2-4. When I try to upgrade
from 4.10-4 using dselect, it says that tetex-bin is recommended, but
if I unselect tetex-bin, the dependency resolution screen comes back
and selects it (and its dependencies) again. Even selecting hold for this
package doe
7 matches
Mail list logo
