On Wed, 9 May 2007 15:32:08 -0400, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, 08 May 2007 17:29:38 -0500
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hmm. I should amend that to say: Step 5 does require (fake)root
>> privileges.
> Huh? Here's a longer excerpt:
Oops. I think I mis
On Tue, 08 May 2007 17:29:38 -0500
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 8 May 2007 16:11:54 -0400, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Tue, 08 May 2007 12:47:28 -0500
> > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> On Tue, 8 May 2007 16:10:29 +0200, Raffaele More
On Tue, 8 May 2007 16:11:54 -0400, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, 08 May 2007 12:47:28 -0500
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, 8 May 2007 16:10:29 +0200, Raffaele Morelli
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> > That's ok, I follow the general (healthy) rule and
On Tue, 8 May 2007 20:50:13 +0200 (CEST), pizzapie linuxanchovies <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> said:
> Thanks to everyone who replied with ideas about my post. Let me give
> quick replies to the questions you asked me:
> Manoj--yes, dpkg is in /usr/bin, and is in the user's path, but no
> normal user
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 08:50:13PM +0200, pizzapie_linuxanchovies wrote:
>
>
> Andrew (and anyone else who can do a make-kpkg under a non-root
> account)--what permissions do YOU see when you say ls -l /usr/bin/root?
I was referring to the general case of compiling source as a user and
installi
On Tue, 08 May 2007 12:47:28 -0500
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 8 May 2007 16:10:29 +0200, Raffaele Morelli
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > That's ok, I follow the general (healthy) rule and do not log as root
> > if unnecessary, but for kernel (and program) compile I
Thanks to everyone who replied with ideas about my post. Let me give quick
replies to the questions you asked me:
Manoj--yes, dpkg is in /usr/bin, and is in the user's path, but no normal user
has execute access to dpkg:
$ ls -l /usr/bin/dpkg
-rwxr-x--- 1 root root 174040 May 26 2005 /usr/b
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 04:10:29PM +0200, Raffaele Morelli wrote:
> 2007/5/8, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >On Tue, 8 May 2007 12:12:22 +0200
> >"Raffaele Morelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >[snip]
> >
> >> Me too compile kernels as root and really would like to know why it is
> >> con
On Tue, 8 May 2007 16:10:29 +0200, Raffaele Morelli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> That's ok, I follow the general (healthy) rule and do not log as root
> if unnecessary, but for kernel (and program) compile I can not picture
> 'make-kpkg' or 'configure && make' doing something regrettable.
2007/5/8, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, 8 May 2007 12:12:22 +0200
"Raffaele Morelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Me too compile kernels as root and really would like to know why it is
> considered such a bad habit.
It's generally considered a bad idea to do anything as root unl
On Tue, 8 May 2007 12:12:22 +0200
"Raffaele Morelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Me too compile kernels as root and really would like to know why it is
> considered such a bad habit.
It's generally considered a bad idea to do anything as root unless it's
absolutely necessary. I suppose i
Raffaele Morelli wrote:
I just changed:
1. Processor type and features -> Paravirtualization support
(EXPERIMENTAL) OFF
2. Processor type and features -> Timer frequency (1000 HZ)
3. Processor type and features -> Preemption Model (Preemptible Kernel
(Low-Latency Desktop)
I just changed:
1. Processor type and features -> Paravirtualization support
(EXPERIMENTAL) OFF
2. Processor type and features -> Timer frequency (1000 HZ)
3. Processor type and features -> Preemption Model (Preemptible Kernel
(Low-Latency Desktop))
4. Device Drivers -> Graphics support -> Logo
pizzapie_linuxanchovies wrote:
I was following a tutorial
(http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html) for compiling
a custom kernel, and got to the stage where it said to run this:
"fakeroot make-kpkg clean"
However, this command generated a bunch of errors saying this:
dpkg-a
pizzapie_linuxanchovies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was following a tutorial
> (http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html) for
> compiling a custom kernel, and got to the stage where it said to run
> this: "fakeroot make-kpkg clean"
>
> However, this command generated a bunch of
On Tue, 8 May 2007 05:37:58 +0200 (CEST), pizzapie linuxanchovies
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I was following a tutorial
> (http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html) for
> compiling a custom kernel, and got to the stage where it said to run
> this: "fakeroot make-kpkg clean" Howe
I was following a tutorial (http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html) for
compiling a custom kernel, and got to the stage where it said to run this: "fakeroot
make-kpkg clean"
However, this command generated a bunch of errors saying this:
dpkg-architecture: failure: dpkg --print
17 matches
Mail list logo
