cc. to commun...@debian.org because I'm explaining CT involvment.
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:47:51PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 03:49:13PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
> > On 12/21/23 14:27, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > > Pos
Hello,
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 03:49:13PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
> On 12/21/23 14:27, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > Posting well-intentioned private replies back to the list is not
> > appropriate.
>
> Please clarify how the Debian Community Team wishes us to respo
I'm not Andrew, and can't answer for Andrew or for anyone on the
Debian Community Team, but my take on this is:
On 21 Dec 2023 15:49 -0800, from dpchr...@holgerdanske.com (David Christensen):
> On 12/21/23 14:27, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>> Posting well-intentioned private
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 02:59:26PM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
Clarification, please. Occasionally a miss-configured mail reader will
cause a private off-list reply, which the correspondent does not notice.
My usual response to that sort of thing is to suggest that the
correspondent fix his
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 02:59:26PM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 21:36:00 +
> "Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote:
>
> > Replies to you which are specifically marked as replies off-list are
> > private. Don't repost private information. The nor
Hello,
On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 09:08:57AM +0800, jeremy ardley wrote:
> The problem is when I try and configure private keys for ldap TLS the
> permissions are checked and if it's not owned by openldap and permissions
> 400 or 600 the configuration fails.
>
> Is there a kn
I think the problem is probably unsolvable but I thought I'd ask.
I understand slapd starts as user root and reads config etc and then
changes to user openldap
This means that it could potentially read a private key owned by root
during startup?
The problem is when I try and conf
Subject: I have finally figured out how to export Private Key from
Fortigate firewall and successfully install Godaddy Wildcard SSL
certificate in UniFi Cloud Key Gen 2 Plus Network Controller
Good day from Singapore,
Author: Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
Country: Singapore
Date: 26 Oct
s¹, I used it.
But recently, it the last fow days, when upgrading some minor version of
Thunderbird on both work and personal laptops, the Thunderbird built-in
keystore has no private keys anymore, the upgrade deletes them ! It's
would be much on an issue if I could reimport them again, I h
l. I do not want to effect
> (= muck this up) this functionality because it works well for
> now.
Then don't touch it ;)
> Shouldn't I be able to install an imap server on the
> debian box and forward messages of interest to it, then reach
> imap4 on the priva
On Fri 22 Oct 2021 at 11:09:14 (-0500), Martin McCormick wrote:
> I was all ready to use .local as our domain name and then
> I looked that up and there is a good wikipedia article which
> explains how that is problematic and recommends using something
> like .lan, .office or something else
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 11:09 AM Martin McCormick
wrote:
> .
> When I was researching, the article in wikipedia I read
> said that many commercial systems have email clients which
> understand imap, pop3, etc. The systems likely to do this on our
> network are a windows10 box, an iMa
k with bridges holding the whole thing
> together. You should have seen some of the arp storms that would
>
> By the time I left, we were using the huge private
> network space of 10.0.0.0 with aNAT or Network Address
> Translation to parts of the old Class B network and it gen
On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 11:09:14 -0500
"Martin McCormick" wrote:
>
> Shouldn't I be able to install an imap server on the
> debian box and forward messages of interest to it, then reach
> imap4 on the private net from any system that speaks imap or has
> an imap
e it works well for
now.
Shouldn't I be able to install an imap server on the
debian box and forward messages of interest to it, then reach
imap4 on the private net from any system that speaks imap or has
an imap client?
That would do what I need to do.
When I was r
On 2021-10-20 19:16, Joe wrote:
On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:46:11 -0500
"Martin McCormick" wrote:
Also, I have put /etc/hosts files on Linux systems and a
Mac and I believe there is a hosts file one can add to Windows
systems for a similar effect.
Indeed so, it is even in a folder calle
with big departments getting let's say 1024 or 512
possible addresses and others getting 16 or 32 addresses.
By the time I left, we were using the huge private
network space of 10.0.0.0 with aNAT or Network Address
Translation to parts of the old Class B network and it generally
worked well
On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:46:11 -0500
"Martin McCormick" wrote:
> Also, I have put /etc/hosts files on Linux systems and a
> Mac and I believe there is a hosts file one can add to Windows
> systems for a similar effect.
>
>
Indeed so, it is even in a folder called 'etc', which I think is in
On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:46:11 -0500
"Martin McCormick" wrote:
> Can systems on a 192.168.x VLAN use smtp to send
> mail to each other?
I know of no reason why not. However, one thing to be careful of: These
are class C networks, so the default netmask will be 255.255.255.0.
With that, you will ne
On Mi, 20 oct 21, 19:14:20, deloptes wrote:
> Martin McCormick wrote:
>
> > The installation, here, is like millions of others. We are on a
> > private VLAN with the router acting as the gateway to our ISP's
> > network and the internet. There is nothing unusual a
Martin McCormick wrote:
> The installation, here, is like millions of others. We are on a
> private VLAN with the router acting as the gateway to our ISP's
> network and the internet. There is nothing unusual about that so
> the question is Can systems on a 192.168.x VLAN
The installation, here, is like millions of others. We are on a
private VLAN with the router acting as the gateway to our ISP's
network and the internet. There is nothing unusual about that so
the question is Can systems on a 192.168.x VLAN use smtp to send
mail to each other?
I r
net-of-things devices, but the bandwidth it offers is
> enough to SSH and read the end of a log file and restart a daemon. Since
> I have a few technically-minded friends and acquaintances living in the
> same dense urban area, I am considering trying to use it to establish a
> kind of privat
few technically-minded friends and acquaintances living in the
same dense urban area, I am considering trying to use it to establish a
kind of private network for emergency access.
I have found these articles, about a LoRa-based USB device and its use
to do just that kind of thing:
https
nips/']
These snippets that I made make me be more productive.
Best, Yukiharu.
On Thu, 14 May 2020 23:48:44 +0900
Yukiharu YABUKI wrote:
> I am confusing that I wasn't able to achieve to use private snippets
> with UltiSnips.
--
++++++++=
Hello, Debian folks.
I am confusing that I wasn't able to achieve to use private snippets
with UltiSnips.
Vim with UltiSnips works fine basically. Then I advanced next step.
I tried time and lorem can expand. Then I did
$ cp /var/lib/vim/addons/UltiSnips/all.snippets \
~/myUlti
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> It has something to do with it, because normally I would code things
> I need myself! Since my house is not ready and I have move out on
> 31th from my provisory flat and continue living in my Sprinter, I have
> not the possibility to code anythin currently!
I don't kno
Stefan Monnier writes:
>> I used it at my previous job, and it works fine. Bonus: it has Debian
>> packages, and it is Free Software.
>
> I only see packages for the client side.
Eh. You're right.
The Seafile site has a download for the server though.
Regards,
Mart
--
"We will need a longer
> I used it at my previous job, and it works fine. Bonus: it has Debian
> packages, and it is Free Software.
I only see packages for the client side.
Is there a Debian package for the server side (like there used to be
for owncloud)?
Stefan
Hi,
Am 2018-05-30 hackte to...@tuxteam.de in die Tasten:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 08:13:22AM +0300, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>> Tell the bookkeeper to download all those pfd invoices and whatelse
>> per SFTP? -- Sounds funny except if there is a Linux Geek! ;-)
>
> Your bookkeeper's browser mos
"Michelle Konzack" writes:
> Good day,
>
> I am searching vor a OwnCloud/NextCloud replacement, because I use
> exclusively and can not use MySQL. Also the updates drive me nuts
> and its resurce conumption.
>
> Is there something MUCH MORE simplier and lighter?
>
> Preferable without ANY databa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 08:13:22AM +0300, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Good morning,
[...]
> Tell the bookkeeper to download all those pfd invoices and whatelse
> per SFTP? -- Sounds funny except if there is a Linux Geek! ;-)
Your bookkeeper's brows
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:47:48PM +0200, deloptes wrote:
> Michelle Konzack wrote:
[...]
> > (we have since 3 weeks between 24°C and 30°C and no rain in sight)
>
> How this does contribute to the original question. If everybody starts
> writing her
Hello Gene,
Am 2018-05-29 hackte Gene Heskett in die Tasten:
> On Tuesday 29 May 2018 16:47:48 deloptes wrote:
> I OTOH, feel I have to defend her. First, I had no clue where she
> hails
> from, so I now know, and a wee bit about a place on the far side of
> the
> planet, so reading about her curr
Hi,
Am 2018-05-29 hackte deloptes in die Tasten:
> How this does contribute to the original question. If everybody starts
> writing here his/her daily business or life stories, it will finish
> the
> list.
It has something to do with it, because normally I would code things
I need myself! Since
Good morning,
Am 2018-05-29 hackte Dan Purgert in die Tasten:
> Michelle Konzack wrote:
>> Is there something MUCH MORE simplier and lighter?
> Offhand, content-management systems come to mind, but none of those
> are
> particularly "light" (nor do they fit that "no database" desire).
>
> However
poster, and helpfull to many, on
> this list for quite some time.
Agree with you, but if you care, you could always reply private and ask her,
correct?
At least I have to admit the information was not too much and not too less
to bother, but still ... it had nothing to do with the question.
regards
On Tuesday 29 May 2018 16:47:48 deloptes wrote:
> Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > OK, I can code it my self, but currently I have ABSOLUTELY NOT TIME,
> > because I have to care about a new Organic Farm where I am co-owner
> > and only person working there curently. The house is only half ready
> > wi
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> OK, I can code it my self, but currently I have ABSOLUTELY NOT TIME,
> because I have to care about a new Organic Farm where I am co-owner
> and only person working there curently. The house is only half ready
> without roof, which I get in August and currently I drive wi
I started using OwnCloud three years ago, in order to avoid the i cloud.
I noticed especially in the last upgrade that it has become much easier
and more straightforward.
I can't imagine a cloud that doesn't use a database, though there is
probably a solution that won't involve mySQL.
On Tue,
Am 29.05.2018 um 11:47 schrieb Michelle Konzack:
> Good day,
>
> I am searching vor a OwnCloud/NextCloud replacement, because I use
> exclusively and can not use MySQL. Also the updates drive me nuts
> and its resurce conumption.
>
> Is there something MUCH MORE simplier and lighter?
>
> Prefer
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Good day,
>
> I am searching vor a OwnCloud/NextCloud replacement, because I use
> exclusively and can not use MySQL. Also the updates drive me nuts
> and its resurce conumption.
>
> Is there something MUCH MORE simplier and lighter?
>
> Preferable without ANY databases a
Only thing I can vouch for is syncthing, which is a little more setup
but worth it. You don't get a webGUI to actually view and download files
though, only to manage clients.
So it kind of depends on your use case - what is device A and what is
device B that people want to sync between? Is it
Good day,
I am searching vor a OwnCloud/NextCloud replacement, because I use
exclusively and can not use MySQL. Also the updates drive me nuts
and its resurce conumption.
Is there something MUCH MORE simplier and lighter?
Preferable without ANY databases and written in PHP5 for possibel
extensi
I tried:
apt remove ca-certificates
and then:
apt install ca-certificates
But the problem persists..
I'd follow your suggest.
I've backed up, some scripts and openbox configurations.
Now I'm ready to do a reinstall from scratch.
Anyway, before that, I'd like to try to remove all "non-jessie"
> Now, when I open chromium or midori, I receive the error in the message
> subject.
> Any https url is not opened and a warning page is displayed instead.
>
> What could be the problem?
Sounds like the root CA (Certification Authority) certificates aren't
installed, making it impossible to esta
Hi all,
I'm helping a friend with his netbook, an old acer aspire one, on
which I had installed
Debian Jessie about two years ago.
He was receiving a message at boot: "run fsck manually" for some
filesystem inconsistency.
He ask me for help, so after having run fsck the system boot properly.
Th
Sven Hartge (2018-01-18):
> This was https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885325, fixed
> in systemd 236-3. It has migrated to Buster yesterday, so upgrading will
> fix it for you.
I was not expected such a tight race condition between when I checked
this and when I wrote the mail.
T
On 2018-01-18 15:57 +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> David Wright (2018-01-18):
>> I can't replicate this on stretch. What versions of what are
>> you running?
>
> Sorry, I should have mentioned it: it's Buster, up-to-date by a few
> days.
>
>> Could you give some explicit commands, and where to typ
Nicolas George wrote:
> I noticed that for some time, sshd is being started in a separate
> filesystem namespace. As a consequence, mounts done from a SSH shell are
> not visible from the main system, and that disrupts my use habits.
This was https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885
David Wright (2018-01-18):
> I can't replicate this on stretch. What versions of what are
> you running?
Sorry, I should have mentioned it: it's Buster, up-to-date by a few
days.
> Could you give some explicit commands, and where to type them.
ssh box
mkdir /tmp/dummy
sudo mount -t tmpfs dummy /
On Thu 18 Jan 2018 at 14:59:34 (+0100), Nicolas George wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I noticed that for some time, sshd is being started in a separate
> filesystem namespace. As a consequence, mounts done from a SSH shell are
> not visible from the main system, and that disrupts my use habits.
>
> Is it on pu
Hi.
I noticed that for some time, sshd is being started in a separate
filesystem namespace. As a consequence, mounts done from a SSH shell are
not visible from the main system, and that disrupts my use habits.
Is it on purpose?
I have tracked things in the source code to exec_needs_mount_namespa
Le 23/12/2017 à 00:46, Phil Reynolds a écrit :
On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 10:59:24 +0100
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
How does it know the router address if there is no route ?
Maybe the output of the following command is more complete :
ip -4 route show table all
http://paste.debian.net/1002048/
The
On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 10:59:24 +0100
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> How does it know the router address if there is no route ?
> Maybe the output of the following command is more complete :
>
> ip -4 route show table all
http://paste.debian.net/1002048/
> Is the IPv4 configuration static or dynamic (
.0 Gateway * Genmask 255.255.255.0 Flags U
Metric 0 Ref 0 Use 0 Iface wlan0
Is that all ? No default route ?
How can it reach any address outside the private subnet ?
What it can see locally on the physical network, it reaches. Otherwise
it goes through the router. I haven't interfered w
; on it:
> >
> > Destination 192.168.0.0 Gateway * Genmask 255.255.255.0 Flags U
> > Metric 0 Ref 0 Use 0 Iface wlan0
>
> Is that all ? No default route ?
> How can it reach any address outside the private subnet ?
What it can see locally on the physical network, it
ny address outside the private subnet ?
Output of "route -A inet6" is much longer - see
http://paste.debian.net/1001796 - note that this is "as is", I haven't
concealed anything.
That does not look like an IPv6 routing table, not even like any routing
table. It rather lo
On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:10:40 +
Phil Reynolds wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 07:23:06 +0100
> Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> > Just another thought : isn't it possible to set up Asterisk to
> > listen explicitly on both the private and public IPv4 addresses
> > instead
On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 17:30:25 +0900
メット wrote:
> Try setup asterisk address as ANY ie.
> 0.0.0.0.
>
> Then asterisk will act on both addresses.
That is probably the equivalent of the default, i.e. no address
specified, which fails as indicated. I will however try it later.
--
Phil Reynolds
ma
put of "route -A inet6" is much longer - see
http://paste.debian.net/1001796 - note that this is "as is", I haven't
concealed anything.
> >>> - If I could get the phone to pick up the private address of the
> >>> Asterisk box rather than the publi
asier, or could just add an unnecessary layer of complexity.
>>>
>>> How does the private client know that the public server address is
>>> reachable directly on the LAN an not through the router ?
>>
>> That I couldn't say, but it's plainly the c
asier, or could just add an unnecessary layer of complexity.
>>>
>>> How does the private client know that the public server address is
>>> reachable directly on the LAN an not through the router ?
>>
>> That I couldn't say, but it's plainly the c
Le 21/12/2017 à 01:48, Phil Reynolds a écrit :
At no point does the router get involved in the communication
between the phone and the Asterisk box. To do so might make things
easier, or could just add an unnecessary layer of complexity.
How does the private client know that the public
On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 21:08:21 +0100
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> IIUC, both the public and the private subnets are on the same
> physical LAN ?
Yes, that is correct.
> > If I set up Zoiper to use the FQDN of the Asterisk box, it
> > connects
>
> I guess you mean the pub
changing them on the router.
I have IPv6 on the network, and, were all the apps I need to use on the
phone enabled, there would not be a problem, however some of them
require IPv4.
I have both public and private networks - let's say they are
192.0.2.48/28 and 192.168.0.0/24.
My network inc
> uses the public IP address (192.0.2.51) of the Asterisk box, which,
> > because it can see the phone directly, then responds using its own
> > private address (192.168.0.4) - this causes Zoiper to fail to
> > register. (it is clear from a tcpdump that this is happening)
> >
can see the phone directly, then responds using its own
> private address (192.168.0.4) - this causes Zoiper to fail to
> register. (it is clear from a tcpdump that this is happening)
>
> At no point does the router get involved in the communication between
> the phone and the Asteri
network, and, were all the apps I need to use on the
phone enabled, there would not be a problem, however some of them
require IPv4.
I have both public and private networks - let's say they are
192.0.2.48/28 and 192.168.0.0/24.
My network includes several physical machines that act as servers, an
php5-fpm restart`.
Now I can confirm that a folder
`/tmp/systemd-private-90d6b4c0238b41199e49bcf031b45183-php5-fpm.service-kY3OWo/`
has been created.
I can further confirm that the php-fpm now has a private tmp folder when
accessing `/tmp`.
2) CHROOT ENABLED = FAILS
In my configuration /etc
I can only imagine this is a security problem. So
I was looking into a way on how that particular PHP-FPM worker would have
something like a private tmp directory. And I found something.
I read about [PrivateTmp](https://access.redhat.com/blogs/766093/posts/1976243)
on the Red Hat blog and th
On 8/5/2016 3:03 PM, David Wright wrote:
[snip]
How about trying to do
http://forums.justlinux.com/showthread.php?147959-How-to-install-and-boot-145-operating-systems-in-a-PC
[snip]
forums.justlinux.com has a display problem.
As suggested I went to FAQ.
I clicked on "Contact Us".
Their 'bot fi
On Friday 03 June 2016 15:32:14 David Wright wrote:
> I did discover that it's obvious if you try to Xorg -configure
> while X is running
There's a hole in the bucket, dear Eliza
This is why I was trying to do it at single user level, to be *certain* that X
wasn't running. :-)
X is there,
On Fri 03 Jun 2016 at 10:28:32 (+0100), Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 03 June 2016 10:07:13 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > I wanted to log in without X
> > and runlevel 1 has no X.
>
> So I next tried to shut X down. I have tried this before without success, so
> I googled again, and gathered that what
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 03 June 2016 10:07:13 Lisi Reisz wrote:
>> I wanted to log in without X
>> and runlevel 1 has no X.
>
> So I next tried to shut X down. I have tried this before without success, so
> I googled again, and gathered that what I needed to do in fact was shut down
> my
On Friday 03 June 2016 09:59:29 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> I didn't know what foo was anyway.
I meant that I didn't know specifically what foo was in that context.
Lisi
On Friday 03 June 2016 10:07:13 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> I wanted to log in without X
> and runlevel 1 has no X.
So I next tried to shut X down. I have tried this before without success, so
I googled again, and gathered that what I needed to do in fact was shut down
my dm. See:
https://wiki.debia
On Wednesday 01 June 2016 18:52:40 David Wright wrote:
> AIUI one can configure a box to run X in all runlevels but 1;
> however, there's no need to do it that way. None of my machines
> run X automatically at runlevel 2: I have to use startx.
This is indubitably true, but irrelevant to the proble
On Wednesday 01 June 2016 14:43:29 Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 9:10 PM Dan Purgert wrote:
> > Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 31 May 2016 23:56:02 Richard Hector wrote:
> > >> On 01/06/16 07:31, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > >> > Now to do what I really wanted to do all along, and ssh
On Wednesday 01 June 2016 23:07:55 David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 31 May 2016 at 20:31:32 (+0100), Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Thursday 31 March 2016 15:08:24 Brian wrote:
> > > On Thu 31 Mar 2016 at 13:27:35 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 31 March 2016 12:28:57 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >
David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 01 Jun 2016 at 14:47:11 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>> I came "late" to the party myself, and missed the post where I imagine
>> why Lisi is after runlevel 1.
>>
>> Personally, with the exception of my laptop, everything starts in
>> runlevel 3 here.
>
On Tue 31 May 2016 at 20:31:32 (+0100), Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Thursday 31 March 2016 15:08:24 Brian wrote:
> > On Thu 31 Mar 2016 at 13:27:35 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > On Thursday 31 March 2016 12:28:57 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > > 1. Each computer should have an SSH server running (on Deb
On Wed 01 Jun 2016 at 14:47:11 (-), Dan Purgert wrote:
> Mark Fletcher wrote:
> > --001a114056c6437ae5053437ad41
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 9:10 PM Dan Purgert wrote:
> >
> >> Lisi Reisz wrote:
> >> > On Tuesday 31 May 2016 23:56:02 Richard Hecto
Mark Fletcher wrote:
> --001a114056c6437ae5053437ad41
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 9:10 PM Dan Purgert wrote:
>
>> Lisi Reisz wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 31 May 2016 23:56:02 Richard Hector wrote:
>> >> On 01/06/16 07:31, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>> >> > Now to do what
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 9:10 PM Dan Purgert wrote:
> Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Tuesday 31 May 2016 23:56:02 Richard Hector wrote:
> >> On 01/06/16 07:31, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> >> > Now to do what I really wanted to do all along, and ssh in to run
> level
> >> > one as root:
> >> >
> >> > lisi@Tux-II:
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 May 2016 23:56:02 Richard Hector wrote:
>> On 01/06/16 07:31, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>> > Now to do what I really wanted to do all along, and ssh in to run level
>> > one as root:
>> >
>> > lisi@Tux-II:~$ ssh root@192.168.0.5
>> > ssh: connect to host 192.168.0.5 port 2
On Wednesday 01 June 2016 01:20:52 John Hasler wrote:
> Lisi writes:
> > The pipe symbol doesn't work on the keyboard at present attached
>
> Then put the output of ps in a file and search that.
The small part of the problem I am trying to solve at this precise minute is
that I am working almost
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/06/16 12:20, John Hasler wrote:
> Lisi writes:
>> The pipe symbol doesn't work on the keyboard at present attached
>
> Then put the output of ps in a file and search that.
>
Or for a general solution to a faulty key, since this is on the
con
On Tue, 31 May 2016 23:27:36 +0100
Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> Starting Nmap 6.00 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2016-05-31 23:14 BST
> Nmap done: 1 IP address (0 hosts up) scanned in 0.52 seconds
> root@Tux-II:/home/lisi# nmap 192.168.0.5 -Pn 22
For future reference, this should have been nmap 192.168.0.5
On Wednesday 01 June 2016 00:42:47 Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016, at 19:25, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > ...
> > Assuming that sshd is actually running at that stage, which it looks as
> > though it isn't
> > ...
>
> Looks as though I've given you mostly information that you don't need.
> S
On Tue, May 31, 2016, at 19:25, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> ...
> Assuming that sshd is actually running at that stage, which it looks as
> though
> it isn't
> ...
Looks as though I've given you mostly information that you don't need.
Sorry about that. At the risk of doing so again, here's how you can
ot. Once in, I can su. But the screen attached to the
computer was asking for root, so I thought the computer wouldn't accept
anything else at that stage.
I only need to do one thing remotely at this level, and if I can't do it, I
shall yet again give up any attempt to run Ubuntu, even as a dual boot.
And I have now basically got ssh working over my private network \o/, and have
used it for updating my husband's computer while he was sitting at it!!
(Note update not upgrade!)
Lisi
On Tuesday 31 May 2016 23:56:02 Richard Hector wrote:
> On 01/06/16 07:31, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > Now to do what I really wanted to do all along, and ssh in to run level
> > one as root:
> >
> > lisi@Tux-II:~$ ssh root@192.168.0.5
> > ssh: connect to host 192.168.0.5 port 22: No route to host
> > li
On Tue, May 31, 2016, at 15:31, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> ...
> So I need static IPs fast!
> ...
(The above was actually quoted from an earlier post).
If you want to convert your computers to use static IP addresses, you might
want to take a look at the following web page:
http://www.stevesdebianstu
On 01/06/16 07:31, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Now to do what I really wanted to do all along, and ssh in to run level one
> as
> root:
>
> lisi@Tux-II:~$ ssh root@192.168.0.5
> ssh: connect to host 192.168.0.5 port 22: No route to host
> lisi@Tux-II:~$ ssh lisi@192.168.0.5
Run level one? AKA single us
On Tuesday 31 May 2016 21:51:30 Joe wrote:
> On Tue, 31 May 2016 20:31:32 +0100
>
> Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > ---
> > Now to do what I really wanted to do all along, and ssh in to run
> > level one as root:
> >
> > lisi@Tux-II:~$ ssh root@192.168.0.5
> > ssh
On Tue, 31 May 2016 20:31:32 +0100
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> ---
> Now to do what I really wanted to do all along, and ssh in to run
> level one as root:
>
> lisi@Tux-II:~$ ssh root@192.168.0.5
> ssh: connect to host 192.168.0.5 port 22: No route to host
>
On Thursday 31 March 2016 15:08:24 Brian wrote:
> On Thu 31 Mar 2016 at 13:27:35 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Thursday 31 March 2016 12:28:57 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > 1. Each computer should have an SSH server running (on Debian that
> > > would be package openssh-server: in Debian it has p
On Thu 31 Mar 2016 at 14:34:47 (+0200), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 01:27:35PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > It is installed and running. I can ssh from Eros, but not into it. If I
> > just
> > try to ssh from Tux-II to Eros, I get the error "Could not connect to host
> >
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016, Lisi Reisz wrote:
So I need static IPs fast! or a hosts file?
That's how I do it. Only make that "or" above an "and!"
Also, liberal use of public-keys practically automates the whole
thing, so that you don't have to bother with pesky p
1 - 100 of 300 matches
Mail list logo
