On Sat, 22 Aug 2009, Chris Burkhardt wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > currently perusing the FAQ, section 5.10 asks, "where is pine?"
> > since alpine is apparently available for debian, shouldn't that
> > section at least mention that alternative
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> currently perusing the FAQ, section 5.10 asks, "where is pine?"
> since alpine is apparently available for debian, shouldn't that
> section at least mention that alternative? i've used alpine as a
> drop-in replacement for pine on fed
currently perusing the FAQ, section 5.10 asks, "where is pine?"
since alpine is apparently available for debian, shouldn't that
section at least mention that alternative? i've used alpine as a
drop-in replacement for pine on fedora for quite some time. is there
a bette
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OA> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 04:47:41AM +, i'll teach you to turn away.
wrote:
>> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> i'll teach you to turn away. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> OA> Did you put that working mail cap entry into .mailcap?
>> i
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 04:47:41AM +, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote:
> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> i'll teach you to turn away. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> way. the weird thing is, though, that my local .mailcap didn't override
> >> it. & i tried changing sensible-br
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> i'll teach you to turn away. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> way. the weird thing is, though, that my local .mailcap didn't override
>> it. & i tried changing sensible-browser, which also didn't do anything.
>> so i'm at a bit of a loss as to how to make
Chris Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CB> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 04:07:28AM +, i'll teach you to turn away.
wrote:
>> echo'ing it seems to run & then dump out of lynx...
CB> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ file $(which sensible-browser)
CB> /usr/bin/sensible-browser: Bourne shell script text
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 04:07:28AM +, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote:
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RJ> Works for me...
> RJ> $ echo $(which sensible-browser)
> RJ> /usr/bin/sensible-browser
>
> echo'ing it seems to run & then dump out of lynx...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ fi
so i just commented the
> >> stupid thing out & boom, we're back to normal. i have no clue what
> >> happened, but it's nice to be able to use lynx again from pine.
> OA> This solution is only temporary work around. If update-mime program is
> OA> run
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i'll teach you to turn away. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> OA> The real root cause fix is to get sensible-browser working.
>> OA> It is simple shell script. You can see it
>> OA> $ view $(which sensible-browser)
>> $ view $(which sensible-browser)
>> W
ing out & boom, we're back to normal. i have no clue what
>> happened, but it's nice to be able to use lynx again from pine.
DB> Probably related to this:
DB> debianutils (2.30) unstable; urgency=low
DB> * Raise sensible-browser's mime priority to 6. closes: #466
it, but that didn't work, so i just commented the
>>> stupid thing out & boom, we're back to normal. i have no clue what
>>> happened, but it's nice to be able to use lynx again from pine.
> OA> This solution is only temporary work around. If update-mime pr
e what
>> happened, but it's nice to be able to use lynx again from pine.
OA> This solution is only temporary work around. If update-mime program is
OA> run by installer, it may be overwritten. If you want to use partilcular
OA> program to handle HTML mime type, then you shou
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 06:13:36PM +, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote:
> i'll teach you to turn away. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> l> but something changed, even though pine hasn't been updated in
> l> forever. i can't find a setting
> happened, but it's nice to be able to use lynx again from pine.
Probably related to this:
debianutils (2.30) unstable; urgency=low
* Raise sensible-browser's mime priority to 6. closes: #466517.
-- Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:47:54 -0400
i'll teach you to turn away. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
l> but something changed, even though pine hasn't been updated in
l> forever. i can't find a setting i even accidentally hit, but now it
l> just says "[VIEWER command launched]", & doesn&#
ven't re/installed/upgraded/anything lynx or links2 since
pine started acting oddly.
though, i did just try to upgrade lynx, & the system did. it
removed lynx-ssl, installed lynx-cur, & upgraded lynx. i WAS then able to
set the www-browser to lynx... but pine's still acting
then copied
> >> lynx as /usr/bin/sensible-browser, but doing so made no difference to
> >> pine.
> AM> The script /usr/bin/sensible-browser points to /usr/bin/www-browser or
> AM> /usr/bin/x-www-browser. So rather than renaming, a better option would
> AM> be to
Arvind Marathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AM> On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 6:56 AM, i'll teach you to turn away.
>>for curiousity's sake, i renamed sensible-browser & then copied
>> lynx as /usr/bin/sensible-browser, but doing so made no difference to
>&g
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
RJ> On 07/25/08 20:27, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote:
>> i haven't, but i sorely fear change. :D
RJ> A Linux user who fears change? Are you sure that's not a 3B1 on
RJ> your desk?
i'm pretty sure, but i'm too busy playing my green-screen g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/25/08 20:27, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote:
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RJ> On 07/25/08 15:32, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote:
>>> yes, i know pine is a million years old. i still
like links2.
>
>for curiousity's sake, i renamed sensible-browser & then copied
> lynx as /usr/bin/sensible-browser, but doing so made no difference to
> pine.
The script /usr/bin/sensible-browser points to /usr/bin/www-browser or
/usr/bin/x-www-browser. So rather th
Aaron Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AH> On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote:
>> hi, yes, i have:
>> url-viewers="/usr/bin/lynx _URL_"
AH> Do the URLs have any special characters ("?", "&" from CGI and whatn
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
RJ> On 07/25/08 15:32, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote:
>> yes, i know pine is a million years old. i still love it. so
>> shh.
RJ> Since you like pine, have you tried alpine?
i haven't, but i sorely fear
Miles Fidelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MF> i'll teach you to turn away. wrote:
>> hi, yes, i have:
>> url-viewers="/usr/bin/lynx _URL_"
MF> A couple of perhaps silly questions:
MF> - does lynx still work when invoked directly?
MF> - has something changed in you search path?
hey, f
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote:
> hi, yes, i have:
>
> url-viewers="/usr/bin/lynx _URL_"
>
> that formatting is as the pine help said, but i really don't
> recall ever setting that in the first place, so perhaps that&#x
i'll teach you to turn away. wrote:
Guillermo Mulliert Carl?n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
GMCn> Hello,
GMCn> |> anyhow, i'm having a strange issue. i used to be able to read
GMCn> |> HTML emails by launching lynx within pine - select view, then the HTML
GMCn&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/25/08 15:32, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote:
> yes, i know pine is a million years old. i still love it. so
> shh.
Since you like pine, have you tried alpine?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
"Kittens giv
Guillermo Mulliert Carl?n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
GMCn> Hello,
GMCn> |> anyhow, i'm having a strange issue. i used to be able to read
GMCn> |> HTML emails by launching lynx within pine - select view, then the HTML
GMCn> |> email, then yes, then *boom*
Hello,
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote:
|> yes, i know pine is a million years old. i still love it. so
|> shh.
|>
|> anyhow, i'm having a strange issue. i used to be able to read
|> HTML emails by launching lynx within pine - s
yes, i know pine is a million years old. i still love it. so
shh.
anyhow, i'm having a strange issue. i used to be able to read
HTML emails by launching lynx within pine - select view, then the HTML
email, then yes, then *boom* i'm pushed into lynx to view the html.
rwrite command did the trick; I then did 'dpkg -r pine',
which removed pine but not the files in common with alpine, and all is well.
Patrick
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 11:57:14AM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I'm trying to install alpine, the free successor to pine, but aptitude
> reports:
>
> Unpacking alpine (from .../alpine_0.83+dfsg-2_i386.deb) ...
> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt
On 4/15/07, Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 11:57 -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I'm trying to install alpine, the free successor to pine, but aptitude
> reports:
>
> Unpacking alpine (from .../alpine_0.83+dfsg-2_i386.deb)
On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 11:57 -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I'm trying to install alpine, the free successor to pine, but aptitude
> reports:
>
> Unpacking alpine (from .../alpine_0.83+dfsg-2_i386.deb) ...
> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/alpi
Hello:
I'm trying to install alpine, the free successor to pine, but aptitude
reports:
Unpacking alpine (from .../alpine_0.83+dfsg-2_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/alpine_0.83+dfsg-2_i386.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man1/rpdump.1.gz&#x
On 12/15/06, Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 15 December 2006 01:28, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
> Hi. I'm working on old workstation with PINE 4.44 (I think released in
> 2002), I can't upgrade software and I must work with users privileges.
> In th
On Friday 15 December 2006 01:28, Andrea Ganduglia wrote:
> Hi. I'm working on old workstation with PINE 4.44 (I think released in
> 2002), I can't upgrade software and I must work with users privileges.
> In this scenario I need define macros for my Pine mail client, or
>
Hi. I'm working on old workstation with PINE 4.44 (I think released in
2002), I can't upgrade software and I must work with users privileges.
In this scenario I need define macros for my Pine mail client, or
better I need define a mechanism that it allows me I move a single
message fro
On 2006-07-27, Anton Piatek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
> --enigD1CC84142CB70DD9FC331E5E
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Hi,
> Anyone know if &
It wasn't when I looked three or four years ago, but the source is
available from Washington University (www.washington.edu/pine/) and it is
(or was then) really easy to compile & install.
Regards, Max
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
Anton Piatek wrote:
> Anyone know if "pine" is in debian? I can't find it...
> If you know where it is, let me know!
It is not.
http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-software.en.html#s-pine
Matěj
--
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
http://www.
Anton Piatek wrote:
Hi,
Anyone know if "pine" is in debian? I can't find it...
If you know where it is, let me know!
Anton
Hi, Anton!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy pine
pine:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 4.64-1duo+sarge1
Version table:
4.64-1duo+sarge1 0
Hi,
Anyone know if "pine" is in debian? I can't find it...
If you know where it is, let me know!
Anton
--
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]home: 02088 702 664
mobile: 07900 951 627 work: 01962 816 557
blog/photos:http://www.strangeparty.com
p
The messages were deleted from /var/spool/mail/user as far as I could tell
they were put nowhere else. I hadn't done enough fine tuning of the pine
configuration file for that. It's possible something verizon.net
installed on the home network may have got a little too hyperactive th
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006, Jude DaShiell wrote:
A little earlier today I lost something on the order of 15,000 messages after
having initially viewed them with a new build of pine.
Define "lost". Were they deleted from /var/spool/mail/$user entirely, or
did pine put them in a different
A little earlier today I lost something on the order of 15,000 messages
after having initially viewed them with a new build of pine. There's
likely some serious instability going on somewhere. I had used fetchmail
to download messages and exim was used to post what i have to the
int
> You really need to tell us a little more about your system, I assume you have
> a SIS chipset and what to know if you can switch graphics cards to get a
> higher resolution.
>
> A lot of that depends on the monitor, lcd, or display you are using. Some
> displays cannot support that resolution. S
>Rishi
> But I'm unable to play mpeg videos in 1280x1027 resolution.
>So therefore I wanted to know if I buy this video card: Pine, 128 MB
>NVIDIA AGP Card, FX model, that it would work on my Debian Sarge
>system - meaning get high resolution and play mpeg videos?
You real
re to get some help.
http://www.winischhofer.at/sisforum/viewtopic.php?t=175
However, I'm assuming that it may not be possible.
So therefore I wanted to know if I buy this video card: Pine, 128 MB
NVIDIA AGP Card, FX model, that it would work on my Debian Sarge
system - meaning get high reso
> > > Email the UW developers and tell them to read up on diversions.
> >
> > They will *not* react kindly to this overall. No modified binary
> > distributions are allowed (which is why pine from debian.org is only
> > available through apt-get source -b pine
On 6/6/05, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 08:41:38PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> > Hello:
> >
> > I've had nano - a free replacement for pico, the editor which comes
> > with pine - installed with pine without
Patrick Wiseman wrote:
So I downloaded the 'testing' nano.deb file, and used dpkg to install
it, with the '--force-overwrite' option. That seems to have worked
(until, of course, I upgrade pine, when I'll have to go through the
whole thing again!).
You could install o
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:31:28AM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> On 6/6/05, I <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Um, thanks guys, but none of this helps me get nano installed with pine.
>
> So I downloaded the 'testing' nano.deb file, and used dpkg to install
On 6/6/05, I <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Um, thanks guys, but none of this helps me get nano installed with pine.
So I downloaded the 'testing' nano.deb file, and used dpkg to install
it, with the '--force-overwrite' option. That seems to have worked
(until, of
gt; They will *not* react kindly to this overall. No modified binary
> distributions are allowed (which is why pine from debian.org is only
> available through apt-get source -b pine (DON'T do this blindly, it
> won't work; you probably need to apt-get build-dep -b pine first,
On Monday June 6 2005 6:04 pm, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 08:41:38PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> > Hello:
> >
> > I've had nano - a free replacement for pico, the editor which
> > comes with pine - installed with pine without any t
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 08:41:38PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I've had nano - a free replacement for pico, the editor which comes
> with pine - installed with pine without any trouble. But I just tried
> to upgrade to pine 4.63, using the .deb file from wash
Hello:
I've had nano - a free replacement for pico, the editor which comes
with pine - installed with pine without any trouble. But I just tried
to upgrade to pine 4.63, using the .deb file from washington.edu, and
it bailed out because nano takes over /usr/bin/pico (which I hadn'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is where the problems arise. Mutt -- Looks promising, but isn't as
> good as Pine(Personal taste though). Pine has more decent way of
> displaying IMAP folders, under M
hed. Instead it gets itself attached as
a file.
Ah, that's PGP/MIME, though different MIME parts aren't necessarily
files. You have run into a limitation in PINE: There is no method to
use PGP/MIME with PINE. If I were you, I would seriously consider
using one of the more featureful (and a
ched as
> a file.
Ah, that's PGP/MIME, though different MIME parts aren't necessarily
files. You have run into a limitation in PINE: There is no method to
use PGP/MIME with PINE. If I were you, I would seriously consider
using one of the more featureful (and actually free, unlike
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Kevin Mark wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 12:44:14PM +0545, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Can we have detached gpg signatures in Pine ? If Yes, how ?
rrs
- --
Hi Ritesh,
I know of 2
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 12:44:14PM +0545, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
> Can we have detached gpg signatures in Pine ? If Yes, how ?
>
>
> rrs
>
> - --
Hi Ritesh,
I know of 2 kinds of sigs: mime and ascii/i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Can we have detached gpg signatures in Pine ? If Yes, how ?
rrs
- --
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT -- http://www.researchut.com
Gnupg Key ID: 04F130BC
"Stealing logic from one person is plagiarism, stealing from many is research".
Hi All,
Does anyone know a way in which it would be possible to lock pine to a
certain folder. This isn't for security but more convience. Basically I
want to do pine -f foldername and keep it open on that...
Cheers
Rus
--
w: http://www.jvds.com | Virtual Dedicated Servers from $15
I have updated my unofficial unofficial pine packages in response to some
security problems which have recently been discovered with pine.
A buffer overflow exists in the way unpatched versions of Pine prior to
4.57 handle the 'message/external-body' type. The Common Vulnerabilities
and
and rather than just not displaying them or showing
them as question marks, it gets confused.
The problem appears to go away in GNOME 2, at least the terminals
running on my own machine. So I think we're content to use xterm for
pine until GNOME-2 makes it into the main distribution.
Cheers
Hi all.
We're having a strange text-displaying issue on one of our machines when
pine is run under gnome-terminal. When switching screens (for example
from a message index to displaying a message) or when scrolling within
certain messages, sometimes whitespace will not erase chara
>From http://www.braincells.com/open/
Click on the woody or sid links to get the right apt source lines.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 09:42:16PM +, Rus Foster wrote:
> When I get a messages to myself in pine it is marked with a + next to the
> email. I find this a nice feature but wondered is it possible to set this
> up for other email addresses that pine handel in the same session?
It
Hi All,
When I get a messages to myself in pine it is marked with a + next to the
email. I find this a nice feature but wondered is it possible to set this
up for other email addresses that pine handel in the same session?
I've had a look but can't see how (if at all possible)
C
[ Please note that I'm not subscribed to this list ]
Before more people ask about it:
pine-4.50 is available in project/experimental. I will not upload it
for unstable because IMHO it's not stable enough yet. Sorry.
Please note that I'm subscribed to pine-announce and *don'
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Cheryl Homiak wrote:
> I know i've seen threads about this on Pine before, even posted on the subject
> but I'm stuck again. Pine450 is out and i'd like to use it.
Debian packages for i386 (woody and sid) are available from
http://www.braincells.com/open
Travis Crump wrote:
> cd /good/directory/; apt-get source pine; cd pine-;
> fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us; dpkg -i ../pine*deb
Or if you're using unstable:
apt-get install apt-src
apt-src install -i pine
And to track new versions of the source as they come out:
apt-src upd
Looks like I'll have to wait until 4.60 is done; the present source package
fetched with this command is 4.44. However, it does work.
Thanks.
Cheryl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheryl Homiak wrote:
I know i've seen threads about this on Pine before, even posted on the subject
but I'm stuck again. Pine450 is out and i'd like to use it. I've never figured
out how to compile it from the source on debian and never have found a full
explanation of it. I&
I know i've seen threads about this on Pine before, even posted on the subject
but I'm stuck again. Pine450 is out and i'd like to use it. I've never figured
out how to compile it from the source on debian and never have found a full
explanation of it. I've been cheating
could get binaries for woody or does
> > one have to compile pine.
> >
>
> The sid ones should work without problems but if you don't mind waiting a
> while, pine 4.50 will be out any day now. When I debianize that, I'll
> make packages especially for woody.
>
Ja
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 11:03:37AM -0700, Stephen A. Witt wrote:
> I've heard that someone was maintaining pine binaries, but I myself have
> always compiled pine from the source from U.W. It is really pretty
> straightforward.
Debianised Pine binaries cannot be redistributed tha
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello All
>
> At http://www.braincells.com/open/ I notice that there
> are binaries for sid and potato but not for woody. Does
> anyone know where I could get binaries for woody or does
> one have to compile pine.
>
The sid one
On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 06:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 5. Based on info in http://www.braincells.com/debian/sid/pine/ made sure
>that I had the following:
>
>libc-client-ssl2001,
>libldap2,
>libncurses5,
>libpam0g,
>libssl0.9.6 and
>
> Hello
>
> libc-client-ssl2001,
> libldap2,
> libncurses5,
> libpam0g,
> libssl0.9.6 and
> mime-support
> # osdep.c:197: x509.h: No such file or directory
> # osdep.c:198: ssl.h: No such file or directory
> # osdep.c:200: pem.h: No such file or directory
> # osdep.c:201: buffer.h: No
Hello
Having problems compiling pine. I am a mutt user myself but
I installed debian woody on a friends computer and he insists that
he wants to use pine.
I decided to practise on my home machine first and did the
following.
1. Create a directory /usr/src/pine
2. Changed to that directory
3
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 02:09:39PM -0500, Brooks R. Robinson wrote:
> | Hello All
> |
> | At http://www.braincells.com/open/ I notice that there
> | are binaries for sid and potato but not for woody. Does
> | anyone know where I could get binaries for woody or does
> | one ha
| Hello All
|
| At http://www.braincells.com/open/ I notice that there
| are binaries for sid and potato but not for woody. Does
| anyone know where I could get binaries for woody or does
| one have to compile pine.
|
Have a look at pine-tracker (non-free).
HTH,
Brooks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello All
>
> At http://www.braincells.com/open/ I notice that there
> are binaries for sid and potato but not for woody. Does
> anyone know where I could get binaries for woody or does
> one have to compile pine.
>
I'
Hello All
At http://www.braincells.com/open/ I notice that there
are binaries for sid and potato but not for woody. Does
anyone know where I could get binaries for woody or does
one have to compile pine.
t.irvine
--
Whoever thinks a faultless piece to see,
Thinks what ne'er was, n
oth are there, in stable, testing, and
> > unstable, and they seem to work quite well.
> >
> > If you wanted to go to rpmfind.net for something like pine, it just
> > might work.
>
> But surely, only if you tried to install something with no dependencies at
> all?
On Sat, 9 Mar 2002, Dave Scott wrote:
> Ok, three different installs of Potato and still cannot get pine to
> install. :-(
>
Unofficial pine 4.44 .debs are available from http://www.braincells.com/open/
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It's a girl! See
> If you wanted to go to rpmfind.net for something like pine, it just
> might work.
But surely, only if you tried to install something with no dependencies at
all? After all, all the library files are registered debian style, not in
the rpm database. Or is rpm only there because alien needs
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 04:47:57PM -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Mar 2002, Camilo wrote:
>
> > I wanted to use PINE under my potato install... found it is not
> > installed? why is this?
>
> Licensing issues. Do this: apt-get install pine-trac
On Sat, 9 Mar 2002, Camilo wrote:
> I wanted to use PINE under my potato install... found it is not
> installed? why is this?
Licensing issues. Do this: apt-get install pine-tracker Follow it's
instructions on how to get the newest version of pine.
> Rpm isnt there either...
W
Thanks Seb,
That worked with both Debian builds.
-Dave
-Original Message-
From: Sebastiaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 1:10 PM
To: Dave Scott
Cc: Debian User
Subject: Re: How to Install Pine on Potato?
High,
On Sat, 9 Mar 2002, Dave Scott wrote:
>
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 07:00:20PM +0100, Jens M?ller wrote:
> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Due to licensing issue, PINE is only available as source package. See
> > below.
>
> Is it so?
>
> I installed it once, there was a dummy package w
High,
On Sat, 9 Mar 2002, Dave Scott wrote:
> Ok, three different installs of Potato and still cannot get pine to
> install. :-(
>
>
> Anyway, here is some of the messages that seem to stand out on the
> compile.
> I can't make heads or tails of any of these messages.
Title: How to Install Pine on Potato?
Ok, three different installs of Potato and still cannot get pine to install. L
First problem I had on all boxes was with –lncurses, I seemed to get around it by installing the development lib of ncurses.
I read through the doc and readme like 20 times
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Due to licensing issue, PINE is only available as source package. See
> below.
Is it so?
I installed it once, there was a dummy package which downloaded the
source package, built binary packages and installed them.
--
Please don't CC me on replies!
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 05:32:31AM -0600, Camilo wrote:
> I wanted to use PINE under my potato install... found it is not
> installed? why is this? Rpm isnt there either...
Due to licensing issue, PINE is only available as source package. See
below.
I think RPM is available in potato
apt-get install rpm
*it should work*
(==timothy==)
=
Hi!
I wanted to use PINE under my potato install... found it is not
installed? why is this?
Rpm isnt there either...
I guess i can use apt-get to install PINE.. but im not so sure about
rpm, since it
1 - 100 of 958 matches
Mail list logo
