On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 07:34:48AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 26 October 2015 05:55:10 Martin Str|mberg wrote:
>
> > In article Gene Heskett
> wrote:
> > > On Monday 26 October 2015 02:29:04 Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> > > > I don't understand why you can't. I can create (and did)
> >
Your threading appears to be broken, possibly because you reply to
a digest article? I think this was in reply to Message-Id:
<201510260331.37495.ghesk...@shentel.net>
Quoting Martin Str|mberg (a...@ludd.luth.se):
> In article Gene Heskett
> wrote:
> > On Monday 26 October 2015 02:29:04 Martin
On Monday 26 October 2015 11:34:48 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 26 October 2015 05:55:10 Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> > In article Gene Heskett
>
> wrote:
> > > On Monday 26 October 2015 02:29:04 Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> > > > I don't understand why you can't. I can create (and did)
> > > > part
On Monday 26 October 2015 05:55:10 Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> In article Gene Heskett
wrote:
> > On Monday 26 October 2015 02:29:04 Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> > > I don't understand why you can't. I can create (and did)
> > > partitions of 200 MB size. I use the text based installer and
> > > man
On Monday 26 October 2015 03:57:53 Felix Miata wrote:
> Gene Heskett composed on 2015-10-26 03:31 (UTC-0400):
> > Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> >> Supposing your variant of installer can't, then why don't you boot
> >> a live CD/stick and partition the hard drive before any booting the
> >> installer
On Monday 26 October 2015 09:55:10 Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> In article Gene Heskett
wrote:
> > On Monday 26 October 2015 02:29:04 Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> > > I don't understand why you can't. I can create (and did) partitions of
> > > 200 MB size. I use the text based installer and manual par
In article Gene Heskett
wrote:
> On Monday 26 October 2015 02:29:04 Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> > I don't understand why you can't. I can create (and did) partitions of
> > 200 MB size. I use the text based installer and manual partitioning.
> >
> On a 4k/sector, 2 terabyte disk? I tried from 500
Gene Heskett composed on 2015-10-26 03:31 (UTC-0400):
> Martin Str|mberg wrote:
>> Supposing your variant of installer can't, then why don't you boot a
>> live CD/stick and partition the hard drive before any booting the
>> installer and then you should be able to tell the installer to just
>> us
On Monday 26 October 2015 02:29:04 Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> In article Gene Heskett
wrote:
> > The worst part of that is that the partitioner will not accept a 1
> > gigabyte partition, which is a great plenty, so I was forced to use
> > 5% of the disk as a boot partition.
>
> I don't understa
In article Gene Heskett
wrote:
> The worst part of that is that the partitioner will not accept a 1
> gigabyte partition, which is a great plenty, so I was forced to use 5%
> of the disk as a boot partition.
I don't understand why you can't. I can create (and did) partitions of
200 MB size. I
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 01:52:57PM +0200, Alexandre De Muer wrote:
> Hi, When installing from "Debian GNU/kFreeBSD 6.0.7 "Squeeze" -
> Official kfreebsd-i386 DVD Binary-1 20130223-17:32"the following
> problem issued from "guided partition layout":"unable to set mount
> from file-system type swap
Hi, When installing from "Debian GNU/kFreeBSD 6.0.7 "Squeeze" - Official
kfreebsd-i386 DVD Binary-1 20130223-17:32"the following problem issued from
"guided partition layout":"unable to set mount from file-system type swap on **
to none". The hardware I'm using: AMD Athlon XP 2200+, MSI 6511 ve
I tried to install lenny in my pc. I have two hdds. First one is IDE slave
which has swap(hdb5) and another sata hdd. I opted for manual partition. I
masde a root partition in sata hdd and wanted to use swap of hdb5. When I
finish partitioning and mounting details, I get message as follows.
"Error
On (17/01/07 03:57), glycerin wrote:
> I I try this way the guided partitioning try to use all my disk and in
> the other steps there isn't a way to use a manual partiotioning.
>
> Any other advice?
> > On (16/01/07 17:06), Gabriele Cicala wrote:
> > > I while I try to install Debian Etch using th
On (17/01/07 03:38), glycerin wrote:
> I've tryed this way but nothing is possible.
> I didn't find anything where I can set the partition manually and
> preserve the old one.
>
> Any new advice?
What medium are you using to boot? If sarge (3.1) try typing expert26
at the boot prompt; this shoul
Hi.
I I try this way the guided partitioning try to use all my disk and in
the other steps there isn't a way to use a manual partiotioning.
Any other advice?
Best Regards.
Gabriele
Clive Menzies ha scritto:
> On (16/01/07 17:06), Gabriele Cicala wrote:
> > I while I try to install Debian Etch
Hi.
I've tryed this way but nothing is possible.
I didn't find anything where I can set the partition manually and
preserve the old one.
Any new advice?
I've tested the same netinstallation for another machine with IDE disks
and all was ok. It seems that the problem is using the SATA disks.
Best
On (16/01/07 17:06), Gabriele Cicala wrote:
> I while I try to install Debian Etch using the actual net-installation
> CD I encounter some problem for the partition already present on the laptop.
> This machine is a dual-boot computer with windows and another Debian
> installation that I want to
I while I try to install Debian Etch using the actual net-installation
CD I encounter some problem for the partition already present on the laptop.
This machine is a dual-boot computer with windows and another Debian
installation that I want to re-install. None of these partiotion is
visible whe
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 09:40:35AM -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
> One thing to look for on these machines: if you replace the MBR
> with GRUB or LILO or the like, they like to go into "system recovery
> mode" where they undo the changes you made. With these machines
> it is better (IMO) to let the
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> You may find that it all works better if you boot into windows and turn off
> virtual memory. also maybe turn off system restore. In the past, those two
> items have written unmoveable blocks on the disk and prevent the partition
> from being pr
You may find that it all works better if you boot into windows and turn
off virtual memory. also maybe turn off system restore. In the past,
those two items have written unmoveable blocks on the disk and prevent
the partition from being properly resized. Its been a over a year now,
though, so t
Søren Christensen wrote:
[snip]
The partition list lists two partitions, a small "unused" partition of 7
MB and a large partition which occupies the rest of the disk, formatted
with ntfs. Containing Win XP.
Can anyone guide me throug this proces?
Here's my setup for a dual boot Compaq Presa
Søren Christensen wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 12:30:05PM +0100, Paolo Pantaleo wrote:
2005/12/19, Søren Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[snip]
However the issue still stands, I'm not able to change the size of the
one partition containing Win XP.
Well, here is another clue: qtparted re
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 03:51:51PM +0100, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
>
> [Bero: please see my comments below about additional qtparted bugs]
>
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, [iso-8859-1] Søren Christensen wrote:
>
> > I'm not able to change the size of the one partition containing Win
> > XP.
> >
> > W
[Bero: please see my comments below about additional qtparted bugs]
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, [iso-8859-1] S?ren Christensen wrote:
> I'm not able to change the size of the one partition containing Win
> XP.
>
> Well, here is another clue: qtparted reports, that support for ntfs
> filesystem is not
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 12:30:05PM +0100, Paolo Pantaleo wrote:
> 2005/12/19, Søren Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Trying to install sarge (net-inst.) on a laptop (Compaq Presario 2100),
> > but fails to partitionate harddisk.
> >
> > Using Knoppix, qtparted started via root-konso
2005/12/19, Søren Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi!
>
> Trying to install sarge (net-inst.) on a laptop (Compaq Presario 2100),
> but fails to partitionate harddisk.
>
> Using Knoppix, qtparted started via root-konsole, qtparted reports:
> Unable to open /UNIOINFS/dev/hdc read-write (Read-only
Hi!
Trying to install sarge (net-inst.) on a laptop (Compaq Presario 2100),
but fails to partitionate harddisk.
Using Knoppix, qtparted started via root-konsole, qtparted reports:
Unable to open /UNIOINFS/dev/hdc read-write (Read-only file system).
/UNIONFS/dev/hdc has been opened read-only.
Usi
Erick Delgado wrote:
Dear Debian,
I'm currently having a problem when I install Debian and end up on the
partition section. For some odd reason everytime it loads up my hdd it
shows 33.8 for both hdd I have. The master hdd is 40gb and the slave is
80gb. I don't know why does it pick up as R
Erick Delgado wrote:
I don't have Ubuntu installed at the moment (before I did). I have
Windows installed because when I was going to install Debian Testing
(etch I believe) to see if it will pick up my hdd correctly it did, but
when I booted I had errors on my first hdd (40gb) which was odd s
I don't have Ubuntu installed at the moment (before I did). I have
Windows installed because when I was going to install Debian Testing
(etch I believe) to see if it will pick up my hdd correctly it did, but
when I booted I had errors on my first hdd (40gb) which was odd so I
installed Windows
Erick Delgado wrote:
Dear Debian,
I'm currently having a problem when I install Debian and end up on the
partition section. For some odd reason everytime it loads up my hdd it
shows 33.8 for both hdd I have. The master hdd is 40gb and the slave is
80gb. I don't know why does it pick up as R
Dear Debian,
I'm currently having a problem when I install Debian and end up on the
partition section. For some odd reason everytime it loads up my hdd it
shows 33.8 for both hdd I have. The master hdd is 40gb and the slave is
80gb. I don't know why does it pick up as RAID? Windows & Ubuntu
34 matches
Mail list logo
