Quoting Christoph Simon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Fri, 1 Dec 2000 14:16:19 -
> "Bob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > In older days a /usr/local was recommended because this is where you would
> > install all the "alien" software on your system. By alien I mean, Things
> > that did not come p
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 03:38:25PM -0500, S.Salman Ahmed wrote:
>
> Is there a HOWTO (or sth similar to one) explaining how to setup sth
> like this ? I am not at all familiar with chroot (or chroot jails), but
> the idea of having stable and unstable on the same machine is very
> interesting.
>
on Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 03:38:25PM -0500, S . Salman Ahmed ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> > "EB" == Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> EB> On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 08:17:23AM -0200, Christoph Simon
> EB> wrote:
> >> Wouldn't it be nice to give it more use even today. Maybe
>
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 08:17:23AM -0200, Christoph Simon wrote:
>
> Wouldn't it be nice to give it more use even today. Maybe someone can
> find a way to have the stable distribution in the main tree and the unstable
> in local. There seem to be many people using stable, but wishing to
> get also
On Fri, 1 Dec 2000 14:16:19 -
"Bob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In older days a /usr/local was recommended because this is where you would
> install all the "alien" software on your system. By alien I mean, Things
> that did not come prepared for your system, or things you compiled yourself.
--- Original Message -
From: Lazar Fleysher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 1:11 PM
Subject: Partitioning disk
>
> Hi Everybody,
>
> This question has been a topic of many discussions but I still do not
> understand the reason why people suggest to
Lazar Fleysher schrieb:
>
> Hi Everybody,
>
> This question has been a topic of many discussions but I still do not
> understand the reason why people suggest to have separate partitions of
> /usr
> /usr/local/
>
> In early days when disks were small, this was the only choise, but now,
> why do
on Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 05:11:13AM -0800, Lazar Fleysher ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
>
> Hi Everybody,
>
> This question has been a topic of many discussions but I still do not
> understand the reason why people suggest to have separate partitions of
> /usr
> /usr/local/
>
> In early days when
also, /var can have a tendency to fill up rapidly, and if it's on the same
partition as / there can be some pretty significant problems cropping up.
rick
Ethan Benson writes:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 05:11:13AM -0800, Lazar Fleysher wrote:
> >
> > Hi Everybody,
> >
> > This question has bee
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 05:11:13AM -0800, Lazar Fleysher wrote:
>
> Hi Everybody,
>
> This question has been a topic of many discussions but I still do not
> understand the reason why people suggest to have separate partitions of
> /usr
> /usr/local/
>
> In early days when disks were small, thi
Hi Everybody,
This question has been a topic of many discussions but I still do not
understand the reason why people suggest to have separate partitions of
/usr
/usr/local/
In early days when disks were small, this was the only choise, but now,
why do not just have a 1 - 2G partition for the sy
11 matches
Mail list logo
