On 03-Mar-13 01:51, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
This seems a fair use case. Note that if the symlink does not exist, a
hierarchy of directories is created automatically by dpkg to accommodate
the files, and the installation process will not explicitly fail.
It doesn't fail - that's correc
> On 02-Mar-13 14:23, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
>> So, no. C does not pre-depend on B unless it is explictly stated in its
>> Pre-depends field. Here is an example:
>>
>> bash ==(Depends)==> base-files ==(Pre-Depends)==> awk.
>>
>
> Thanks - that's what I suspected but it wasn't entirely cle
On 02-Mar-13 14:23, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
So, no. C does not pre-depend on B unless it is explictly stated in its
Pre-depends field. Here is an example:
bash ==(Depends)==> base-files ==(Pre-Depends)==> awk.
Thanks - that's what I suspected but it wasn't entirely clear when I was
> Hello everyone,
>
> One quick question: If package A pre-depends on package B, and package
> C depends on package A, does package C pre-depend on package B?
>
> In other words, is pre-depends transitive across regular dependencies?
C ==(Depends)==> A ==(Pre-Depends)==> B
As you stated the prob
Hello everyone,
One quick question: If package A pre-depends on package B, and package
C depends on package A, does package C pre-depend on package B?
In other words, is pre-depends transitive across regular dependencies?
Thanks,
--
rbmj
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lis
5 matches
Mail list logo