On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 22:05, Kevin McKinley wrote:
> On 27 May 2003 21:06:03 -0400
> "Mark L. Kahnt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From what I've seen of the screenshots of the new Debian installer, the
> > same structure appears to be planned, which I admit concerns me. It may
> > be easier to
On 27 May 2003 21:06:03 -0400
"Mark L. Kahnt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From what I've seen of the screenshots of the new Debian installer, the
> same structure appears to be planned, which I admit concerns me. It may
> be easier to maintain than boot-floppies, but it will be no easier,
> appar
On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 19:33, nate wrote:
> Kevin McKinley said:
>
> > Many who are accustomed to Debian forget how hard it can be at first.
>
> count me as one who will never forget installing debian 2.0 and
> wading through dselect for probably 4 hours choosing packages and
> resolving dependenc
Kevin McKinley said:
> Many who are accustomed to Debian forget how hard it can be at first.
count me as one who will never forget installing debian 2.0 and
wading through dselect for probably 4 hours choosing packages and
resolving dependencies(my first debian install after using slackware
for a
On Tue, 27 May 2003 09:17:54 -0400
Jeremy Petzold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if your gonna pay for a distro buy libranet. their system does not die if
> you apt-get from the main tree...at least that is what they say on
> OSNewswhy anyone would pay 60 bucks for a distro when debian is free
>
5 matches
Mail list logo