On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 12:22:57PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 29 December 2013 00:38:30 Weaver wrote:
> > On Sat, December 28, 2013 3:49 pm, Lisi Reisz wrote:
[..]
> > > It is perfectly possible to lose all or part of one's memory
> > > without an accident. All it requires is old age and
On Sun, 2013-12-29 at 12:22 +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 29 December 2013 00:38:30 Weaver wrote:
> > On Sat, December 28, 2013 3:49 pm, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > On Saturday 28 December 2013 11:56:37 Chris Bannister wrote:
> > >> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 02:43:11PM +0400, Reco wrote:
> > >> >
On Sunday 29 December 2013 00:38:30 Weaver wrote:
> On Sat, December 28, 2013 3:49 pm, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Saturday 28 December 2013 11:56:37 Chris Bannister wrote:
> >> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 02:43:11PM +0400, Reco wrote:
> >> > And storing banking information outside someone's head is
> >>
On Sat, December 28, 2013 3:49 pm, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Saturday 28 December 2013 11:56:37 Chris Bannister wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 02:43:11PM +0400, Reco wrote:
>> > And storing banking information outside someone's head is wrong
>> > on so many levels that I don't even know where to s
On Saturday 28 December 2013 11:56:37 Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 02:43:11PM +0400, Reco wrote:
> > And storing banking information outside someone's head is wrong
> > on so many levels that I don't even know where to start ;)
>
> If you have a nasty accident and lose parts of
On Sat, 2013-12-28 at 23:13 +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 12/28/13, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 02:43:11PM +0400, Reco wrote:
> >> And storing banking information outside someone's head is wrong on so
> >> many levels that I don't even know where to start ;)
> >
> > If
On Sun, 2013-12-29 at 00:56 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 02:43:11PM +0400, Reco wrote:
> > And storing banking information outside someone's head is wrong on so
> > many levels that I don't even know where to start ;)
>
> If you have a nasty accident and lose parts of yo
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 00:56:37 +1300
Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 02:43:11PM +0400, Reco wrote:
> > And storing banking information outside someone's head is wrong on so
> > many levels that I don't even know where to start ;)
>
> If you have a nasty accident and lose parts of
On 12/28/13, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 02:43:11PM +0400, Reco wrote:
>> And storing banking information outside someone's head is wrong on so
>> many levels that I don't even know where to start ;)
>
> If you have a nasty accident and lose parts of your memory is a damn
> go
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 02:43:11PM +0400, Reco wrote:
> And storing banking information outside someone's head is wrong on so
> many levels that I don't even know where to start ;)
If you have a nasty accident and lose parts of your memory is a damn
good reason, and that is just as a start! :)
--
Hi.
On Sat, 28 Dec 2013 21:01:31 +1100
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 12/25/13, Reco wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:51:25 +0100
> > Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 15:40 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 18:04 +0400, Reco wrote:
> >> > > I wrote "one r
On 12/25/13, Reco wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:51:25 +0100
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 15:40 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 18:04 +0400, Reco wrote:
>> > > I wrote "one runs two instances of firefox with different profiles
To friends stuck in propri
On 25/12/13 14:08, Joel Rees wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Reco wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 13:29:28 +0100
>> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>
>>> This would lead to "Error: cannot open display: :0.0".
>>> Sure, $ xhost +; sudo -u [...] does the trick,
>>
>> No, if you do it smart
Hi.
On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 08:33:12 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 08:28 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 11:05 +0400, Reco wrote:
> > > And that assumes you're keeping browsing history. Why people are doin'
> > > this is something that I can never understand
On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 08:28 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 11:05 +0400, Reco wrote:
> > And that assumes you're keeping browsing history. Why people are doin'
> > this is something that I can never understand.
>
> Ok, in this case I recommend to use
>
> [rocketmouse@archlinux
On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 11:05 +0400, Reco wrote:
> And that assumes you're keeping browsing history. Why people are doin'
> this is something that I can never understand.
Ok, in this case I recommend to use
[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ pacman -Q tor-browser-en
tor-browser-en 3.5-1
For my Debian and
Hi.
On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 07:33:53 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 10:15 +0400, Reco wrote:
> > b) That sneaky sandbox user can override firefox with something
> > like /home/user9-boxed/bin/firefox, which is bad.
>
> Here we are again ;).
>
> Using a profile, supported by fir
On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 10:15 +0400, Reco wrote:
> b) That sneaky sandbox user can override firefox with something
> like /home/user9-boxed/bin/firefox, which is bad.
Here we are again ;).
Using a profile, supported by firefox, is the easiest and securest way.
I only use another user, instead of a
Hi.
On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 12:08:01 +0900
Joel Rees wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Reco wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 13:29:28 +0100
> > Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >
> >> This would lead to "Error: cannot open display: :0.0".
> >> Sure, $ xhost +; sudo -u [...] does the trick
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 13:29:28 +0100
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
>> This would lead to "Error: cannot open display: :0.0".
>> Sure, $ xhost +; sudo -u [...] does the trick,
>
> No, if you do it smart way, such as (in .xsessionrc):
>
> xauth extrac
On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:51:25 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 15:40 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 18:04 +0400, Reco wrote:
> > > I wrote "one runs two instances of firefox with different profiles
> >
> > and I replied that you can start your default browse
On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 15:40 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 18:04 +0400, Reco wrote:
> > I wrote "one runs two instances of firefox with different profiles
>
> and I replied that you can start your default browser with a profile
> too. The issue you pointed out is the same for t
On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 18:04 +0400, Reco wrote:
> I wrote "one runs two instances of firefox with different profiles
and I replied that you can start your default browser with a profile
too. The issue you pointed out is the same for the profile approach and
another user account approach. If you wan
On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 14:54:35 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> A last note, before I go off-line for holidays.
>
> A user is allowed to add a profile, but a user needs to ask the admin to
> add a new user ;).
Ok, I've read all your contribution to the thread. Let us start with
something simple.
You'
A last note, before I go off-line for holidays.
A user is allowed to add a profile, but a user needs to ask the admin to
add a new user ;).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: ht
> > Sudo can be configured for passwordless access, but that's not the
> > point.
>
> That is a point, you want users to tinker with root privileges, when
> there is a better, a KISS solution that is idiotproof.
Sorry, with privileges, not root privileges. Anyway completely unneeded,
and anti-KI
Oops, Reco wrote, not I ;).
> On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 14:35 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > Sudo can be configured for passwordless access, but that's not the
> > point.
>
> That is a point, you want users to tinker with root privileges, when
> there is a better, a KISS solution that is idiotproof.
On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 14:35 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Sudo can be configured for passwordless access, but that's not the
> point.
That is a point, you want users to tinker with root privileges, when
there is a better, a KISS solution that is idiotproof.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-us
On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 16:42 +0400, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 13:29:28 +0100
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > This would lead to "Error: cannot open display: :0.0".
> > Sure, $ xhost +; sudo -u [...] does the trick,
>
> No, if you do it smart way, such as (in .xsessionrc):
>
> xaut
Hi.
On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 13:29:28 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> This would lead to "Error: cannot open display: :0.0".
> Sure, $ xhost +; sudo -u [...] does the trick,
No, if you do it smart way, such as (in .xsessionrc):
xauth extract - $DISPLAY | sudo -u user1 -- sh -c \
"cat -> /home/user1/.
On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 16:17 +0400, Reco wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 13:13:26 +0100
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > If I start Firefox with profile A, I might have cookies enabled by
> > default and the history only includes Linux links.
> >
> > When using Firefox profile B, I perhaps have cookies d
On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 13:13:26 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> If I start Firefox with profile A, I might have cookies enabled by
> default and the history only includes Linux links.
>
> When using Firefox profile B, I perhaps have cookies disabled by default
> and the history only includes links to a
On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 16:05 +0400, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 12:55:23 +0100
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > I want to have different profiles on Linux machines to have different
> > settings, different histories without changing the user.
>
> A classic example of a 'XY problem', Ra
Hi.
On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 12:55:23 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> I want to have different profiles on Linux machines to have different
> settings, different histories without changing the user.
A classic example of a 'XY problem', Ralf.
What problem are you trying to solve with this approach?
Re
On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 08:08 +, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> Different browser profiles is like the way Outlook (Express) on
> Windows have/had different profiles. That is a leftover from the old
> times like Windows 3, 9x, etc when there was no possibility to have
> different logins. Unix style compu
35 matches
Mail list logo
