>
>
>
> Original Message
>From: cjns1...@gmail.com
>To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>Subject: Re: OT: mutt/nano spell checking
>Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:26:22 -0400
>
>>On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 10:47:51AM EDT, ow...@netptc.net wrote:
>>
&
Chris Jones wrote:
>
> So far, I can't complain.. Vim has paid me back in kind.
>
> CJ
+1
'vimtutor' can have most up and running proficiently in 30 minutes. Time
well spent IMO.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 06:29:02PM EDT, thveillon.debian wrote:
> Chris Jones wrote:
>
> > Being the absolute Joe User
> > CJ
> >
> [apologies for the unethical massive snip, just couldn't resist
> bouncing on the "Joe User" ;-) ]
Yeah.. maybe I should pursue this on the OT list.. :-)
> For t
Chris Jones wrote:
> Being the absolute Joe User
> CJ
>
[apologies for the unethical massive snip, just couldn't resist bouncing
on the "Joe User" ;-) ]
For those who actually are Joe users :
in "joe" (aptitude install joe) do
^T (calling options)
V ("Language")
Set language
and spell c
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 10:47:51AM EDT, ow...@netptc.net wrote:
[..]
> +1. I teach C in a Debian environment and my students (most of whom
> have never used *nix) use nano.
Probably a good choice, since you teach C, not editing. By the time
you'd finished teaching them Vim, there would be not t
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 10:44:56AM EDT, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 04:27:56PM -0400, Chris Jones wrote:
> > 'p' for 'paste' does strike me as rather more intuitive
> > than Ctrl-V.
>
> That all depends on your background.
Well, then that's no longer intuition. It's knowledge.
Jon Dowland wrote:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 04:27:56PM -0400, Chris Jones wrote:
'p' for 'paste' does strike me as rather more intuitive
than Ctrl-V.
That all depends on your background. I use vi every day (I
am a UNIX systems administrator); most of the time my vi is
actually vim; but I wouldn
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Jon Dowland
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 04:27:56PM -0400, Chris Jones wrote:
>> 'p' for 'paste' does strike me as rather more intuitive
>> than Ctrl-V.
>
> That all depends on your background. I use vi every day (I
> am a UNIX systems administrator); most of t
>
>
>
> Original Message
>From: jon+debian-u...@alcopop.org
>To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>Subject: Re: OT: mutt/nano spell checking
>Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:44:56 +0100
>
>>On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 04:27:56PM -0400, Chris Jones wrote:
>>> &#x
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 04:27:56PM -0400, Chris Jones wrote:
> 'p' for 'paste' does strike me as rather more intuitive
> than Ctrl-V.
That all depends on your background. I use vi every day (I
am a UNIX systems administrator); most of the time my vi is
actually vim; but I wouldn't for a second rec
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 06:19:46AM EDT, Tony Baldwin wrote:
> Vim's keybindings are completely insane and non-intuitive. I've never
> once made sense of how to use the darned thing in a decade of using
> gnu/linux.
'p' for 'paste' does strike me as rather more intuitive than Ctrl-V.
But noth
11 matches
Mail list logo
