On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 00:24:27 -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 03:53:03PM -0500, Paul Morgan wrote:
>>
>> You can get that. You could research at the British Museum, for example.
>> What you really want is everything for free, and you can't reasonably
>> expect people to give awa
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 03:53:03PM -0500, Paul Morgan wrote:
>
> You can get that. You could research at the British Museum, for example.
> What you really want is everything for free, and you can't reasonably
> expect people to give away the copyrighted product of their hard work to
> freeloader
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:47:56 -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
>
> Obviously, for tech stuff, the internet is authoritative. And there
> should be travel brochures and fan sites on the internet. But I would
> much rather "googling for Stonehenge" returned 27 hits comprising
> thousands of printed page
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 10:47:56PM -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
> Piles? Did you follow those links? There are three categories:
> fansites (not authoritative nor deep), travel brochures and tour
> packages (not interested and all), and interesting site
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 09:51:10PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 10:54:13PM -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
>
> Piles of stuff, right there, including two complete categories, about
> anything you could possibly want to know about Stonehenge.
Piles? Did you follow those links? Th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 09:45:10AM -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 06:37:34AM -0500, Paul Morgan wrote:
> [snip]
> > I don't see any problem. I found, I think, the sort of thing for
> > which you were looking in just a few seconds.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 07:10:20PM +1100, Russell Shaw wrote:
> >Help me out here.
>
> The net is best for finding out what books to read;)
No kidding. I don't even have to get up and walk up the street to
Central Library to find the book...
telnet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 10:54:13PM -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
> Watching a program on PBS, I decided I wanted to read about Stonehenge.
> Off to google, I go, searching for "Stonehenge". Didn't like the
> results. Tried Google directory, Yahoo, and Teo
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 06:37:34AM -0500, Paul Morgan wrote:
[snip]
> I don't see any problem. I found, I think, the sort of thing for
> which you were looking in just a few seconds.
[snip]
>
> http://www.aboutstonehenge.info/index.php
Imagine what life would be like if googling for stonehenge r
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 09:06:25AM +, Clive Menzies wrote:
> On (13/01/04 19:10), Russell Shaw wrote:
> > Nano Nano wrote:
> > >Watching a program on PBS, I decided I wanted to read about Stonehenge.
> > >Off to google, I go, searching for "Stonehenge". Didn't like the
> > >results. Tried Go
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Nano Nano wrote:
> Watching a program on PBS, I decided I wanted to read about Stonehenge.
> Off to google, I go, searching for "Stonehenge". Didn't like the
> results. Tried Google directory, Yahoo, and Teoma: didn't like any of
> them.
>
> The experience I wanted was a
Paul Morgan wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:13:42 -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 09:06:25AM +, Clive Menzies wrote:
[snip]
The net is best for finding out what books to read;)
I wouldn't suggest that the net is better than an authoratitive book but
a quick search on stonehenge
On 1/13/04 5:37 AM, "Paul Morgan" wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 09:06:25AM +, Clive Menzies wrote:
>> [snip]
The net is best for finding out what books to read;)
>>> I wouldn't suggest that the net is better than an authoratitive book but
>>> a quick search on stonehenge history produ
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:13:42 -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 09:06:25AM +, Clive Menzies wrote:
> [snip]
>> > The net is best for finding out what books to read;)
>> I wouldn't suggest that the net is better than an authoratitive book but
>> a quick search on stonehenge histo
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Nano Nano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>but these aren't exactly deep; these are more like the Travel
>Brochures you see in hotel lobbies. None of the other links are very
>good at all.
>
>And having to type in "stonehenge history" is the kind of beef I had
>with
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 09:06:25AM +, Clive Menzies wrote:
[snip]
> > The net is best for finding out what books to read;)
> I wouldn't suggest that the net is better than an authoratitive book but
> a quick search on stonehenge history produced:
> http://www.britannia.com/history/h7.html as th
On (13/01/04 19:10), Russell Shaw wrote:
> Nano Nano wrote:
> >Watching a program on PBS, I decided I wanted to read about Stonehenge.
> >Off to google, I go, searching for "Stonehenge". Didn't like the
> >results. Tried Google directory, Yahoo, and Teoma: didn't like any of
> >them.
> >
> >The
Nano Nano wrote:
Watching a program on PBS, I decided I wanted to read about Stonehenge.
Off to google, I go, searching for "Stonehenge". Didn't like the
results. Tried Google directory, Yahoo, and Teoma: didn't like any of
them.
The experience I wanted was a deep, rich, complete, authoritativ
Watching a program on PBS, I decided I wanted to read about Stonehenge.
Off to google, I go, searching for "Stonehenge". Didn't like the
results. Tried Google directory, Yahoo, and Teoma: didn't like any of
them.
The experience I wanted was a deep, rich, complete, authoritative,
well-annotate
19 matches
Mail list logo
