Carl Fink wrote:
> This is an unfair characterization. The criticism isn't that the
> Debian installer doesn't have graphics. The criticism is that the
> choices are both obscure and remarkably confusing in spots.
Actually, I'm done criticizing Debian - I now know it's only meant for Linux
gur
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 12:15:17PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I expect from any Linux distribution (not just Linux as OS - you
> mixed up distributions with systems) to be "easy to mantain and
> update" so Debian it's my preffered choice. And I can "pay" very
> small price for installatio
> Glad to hear it. I've been trying to get Linux installed for about 5
years,
> and the only distribution I have looked at is Debian. Call me a masochist,
but
> I am lured by the idea of an OS that is rock-stable and easy to maintain
and
> update. If only it were easy to install, then Billy boy (n
3 matches
Mail list logo
